RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
I smell corporate hypocrisy…
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
oldmanalex sh.itjust.works oldmanalex@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-08-15
Quote

293   Original
florge feddit.uk florge@feddit.uk
Joined: 2023-07-23
#2 · Quote Reply

Ah the old limewire strat

17
REDACTED infosec.pub REDACTED@infosec.pub
Joined: 2025-02-05
#3 · (edited) Quote Reply

If they win, doesn't that set a precedent for piracy in general? Ironically they might make piracy harder to prosecute.

72
inlandempire jlai.lu inlandempire@jlai.lu
Joined: 2023-08-01
#4 · Quote Reply

oh damn okay ima just stop seeding back then sorry y'all

13
D06M4 lemmy.zip D06M4@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-06-05
#5 · Quote Reply

It's not the same thing at all. People here are sharing things they purchased and love, which actually promotes further sales down the road.

Meta, Amazon, Google, Microsoft and all other companies that are highly invested in generative AIs are appropriating copyrighted content, often destroying originals, modifying it to fit their agendas and selling access to their versions for a monthly subscription, while at the same time damaging other industries and the planet. THAT is much closer to piracy and has no generous intent at all.

49
whyNotSquirrel sh.itjust.works whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-06-10
#6 · Quote Reply

oh damn okay ima just stop seeding back then sorry y'all

You disgust me!

7
ThePantser sh.itjust.works ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2025-02-19
#7 · Quote Reply

If they win, doesn't that set a precedent for piracy in general? Ironically they might make piracy harder to prosecute.

Too bad FB never started a media company. Amazon would never make claims like this about stealing media because they make media and wouldn't want to give people the right to pirate their shit.

17
ThePantser sh.itjust.works ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2025-02-19
#8 · Quote Reply

It's not the same thing at all. People here are sharing things they purchased and love, which actually promotes further sales down the road. Meta, Amazon, Google, Microsoft and all other companies that are highly invested in generative AIs are appropriating copyrighted content, often destroying originals, modifying it to fit their agendas and selling access to their versions for a monthly subsc...

Also they are stealing it for monetary gain vs stealing for fun and entertainment. I dont think there were many "pirates for fun"

20
inlandempire jlai.lu inlandempire@jlai.lu
Joined: 2023-08-01
#9 · Quote Reply

You disgust me!

I can't hear you over the sound of my 0,2 ratio

17
katy ✨ piefed.blahaj.zone cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone
Joined: 2025-06-06
#10 · Quote Reply

but everyone seeds when you're downloading as that's the point of bittorrent.

9
Babalugats feddit.uk Babalugats@feddit.uk
Joined: 2025-04-16
#11 · (edited) Quote Reply

But if they're using it for their ai, won't they be seeding it from them on?
I mean, you might not be able to download an entire book in one go, but you may be able to after 100 questions, or something similar..

7
SharkAttak kbin.melroy.org SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org
Joined: 2024-09-23
#12 · Quote Reply

Tell that to those who have been nuked for the heinous crime of DOWNLOADING.

25
Mereo piefed.ca mereo@piefed.ca
Joined: 2025-08-27
#13 · Quote Reply

Please, provide the link to the article.

7
Luminous5481 "Enemy of the State" anarchist.nexus Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus
Joined: 2025-12-23
#14 · Quote Reply

It's not the same thing at all. People here are sharing things they purchased and love, which actually promotes further sales down the road. Meta, Amazon, Google, Microsoft and all other companies that are highly invested in generative AIs are appropriating copyrighted content, often destroying originals, modifying it to fit their agendas and selling access to their versions for a monthly subsc...

I don't think the law makes exceptions for how you feel about the stuff you're downloading

-5
Luminous5481 "Enemy of the State" anarchist.nexus Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus
Joined: 2025-12-23
#15 · Quote Reply

but everyone seeds when you're downloading as that's the point of bittorrent.

I mean, you can make it so your client doesn't.

7
D06M4 lemmy.zip D06M4@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-06-05
#16 · Quote Reply

I don't think the law makes exceptions for how you feel about the stuff you're downloading

You could read a little about copyright law in different countries to find out how commercial and non-commercial use of copyrighted content works in each one. And if you feel like it and find a bit of spare time after that, come back here and read the comments again. That is if by then you feel qualified to understand them.

6
ramble81 lemmy.zip ramble81@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-06-08
#17 · Quote Reply

I mean, you can make it so your client doesn't.

You got downvoted, but you’re completely correct. Also Meta is basically arguing that leeching is fine.

5
AmyAye nord.pub AmyAye@nord.pub
Joined: 2026-06-16
#18 · Quote Reply

You could read a little about copyright law in different countries to find out how commercial and non-commercial use of copyrighted content works in each one. And if you feel like it and find a bit of spare time after that, come back here and read the comments again. That is if by then you feel qualified to understand them.

Facebook isna US company operating from the US. In this case, laws of other countries do not matter.

-6
BougieBirdie piefed.blahaj.zone Bougie_Birdie@piefed.blahaj.zone
Joined: 2025-07-19
#19 · Quote Reply

Please, provide the link to the article.

I'm often annoyed by this too because a screenshot doesn't really prove anything, but the name of the article and the website are included in the screenshot

Just a web search away

Article text

Configuration settings were modified "so that the smallest amount of seeding possible could occur".

Meta claimed in a court filing this week that despite torrenting an 82 TB dataset of pirated, copyrighted material from shadow libraries to train its LLaMA AI models, that employees "took precautions not to "seed" any downloaded files".

The act of Seeding in torrenting terminology refers to sharing a file with other users during, (or commonly after) downloading it. Since torrenting is a peer-to-peer system, every user downloading a file can also upload parts of it to other users.

Meta's lawyers claim that there are "no facts to show that Meta seeded Plaintiffs' books". This means that the company's defense is pinning hopes on the fact that there isn't currently any proof that Meta shared the material during the torrenting process.

Though Meta claims that there is no evidence of seeding, Michael Clark, an executive at Meta in charge of project management testified that the configuration settings they were using were modified "so that the smallest amount of seeding possible could occur".

Following this statement, a question regarding why Meta chose to minimize seeding was asked, attorney-client privilege was invoked so that Clark could not answer.
Interestingly, the statement issued by Clark shows that Meta sought methods to minimize seeding, but has yet to offer up indication that it entirely prevented seeding copyrighted material.

Additionally, an internal message from Frank Zhang, a Meta researcher, could point toward alleged concealment of potential seeding from Meta's servers, to avoid "risk of tracing back the seeder/downloader" to Facebook servers.

Meta's defense seems to hinge around the lack of evidence around not sharing the large amount of data they have allegedly downloaded to train its AI models. Should Meta win on this defense and prove that downloading copyrighted content isn't illegal, but distribution is, it could shake up future cases of piracy and unauthorized distribution of copyrighted content.

The defense relying on torrenting terminology could also a way for Meta to aim in tripping up courts. Focusing on seeding could further muddy the claim that Meta allegedly knew that it was violating laws by torrenting copyrighted material.

Meta has yet to respond to claims surrounding on whether it knew that it was sharing data during the download process.

Authors allege Meta was "knowing participant" in "illegal peer-to-peer piracy network"

Authors of the copyrighted material alleged to have been obtained by Meta without prior licensing agreements have alleged [PDF] that "Meta's decision to bypass lawful acquisition methods and become a knowing participant in an illegal peer-to-peer piracy network".

With the court battle expected to continue, no final decision around the case has been made. Even following a final decision, it's expected that Meta will attempt to appeal the decision if they were to lose, meaning that final judgements could be a long while away.

But, similar cases do exist. OpenAI was sued by novelists in 2023, with the New York Times also suing OpenAI and Microsoft over "millions" copied news articles. As the long list of LLM-related litigation continues, this is likely not going to be the last we hear from Meta's specific case.

I'm beginning to think that these Facebook people are kinda lame

4
soratoyuki piefed.zip soratoyuki@piefed.zip
Joined: 2026-05-18
#20 · Quote Reply

I love how the only part Meta objects to is the part that upholds the system by helping others. 🫤

29
TheFogan programming.dev TheFogan@programming.dev
Joined: 2023-07-12
#21 · Quote Reply

If they win, doesn't that set a precedent for piracy in general? Ironically they might make piracy harder to prosecute.

I'd hope, but basically they are only protecting downloading, for the most part 99% of piracy prosecution has already shifted focus to uploading, and really the focus is far more on the companies hosting etc... because they learned in the napster era that suing grandmothers and children doesn't really win the PR wars.

13
ParlimentOfDoom piefed.zip ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
Joined: 2025-09-26
#22 · Quote Reply

Facebook isna US company operating from the US. In this case, laws of other countries do not matter.

Wrong.

Facebook is broken to the laws of the countries they operate IN, as well.

4
Mereo piefed.ca mereo@piefed.ca
Joined: 2025-08-27
#23 · Quote Reply

I'm often annoyed by this too because a screenshot doesn't really prove anything, but the name of the article and the website are included in the screenshot Just a web search away ::: spoiler Article text Configuration settings were modified "so that the smallest amount of seeding possible could occur". Meta claimed in a court filing this week that despite torrenting an 82 TB dataset of pirated...

Indeed I hate this. I asked so that the OP can do his job and post the article so that we can we can deeply understand the problem.

5
0xd34d sh.itjust.works 0xd34d@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-06-21
#24 · Quote Reply

Where have you been? This is 1.5 year old news my guy.

5
Smaile lemmy.ca Smaile@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2026-01-28
#25 · Quote Reply

Need to sue them into the dirt

2
FoxAlive lemmy.zip FoxAlive@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2026-06-29
#26 · Quote Reply

Its only bad once it takes the form of Communism/socialism.

Lol.

7
waz feddit.uk waz@feddit.uk
Joined: 2023-06-13
#27 · Quote Reply

But if they're using it for their ai, won't they be seeding it from them on? I mean, you might not be able to download an entire book in one go, but you may be able to after 100 questions, or something similar..

Selling it back to you through their service, while burning the planet?

4
Blizzard lemmy.zip Blizzard@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2023-07-08
#28 · Quote Reply

Is that seriously their defense strategy? Because it's indeed legal to download if you're not seeding but it's not legal to use the downloaded content for commercial purposes, which they clearly did.

21
Luminous5481 "Enemy of the State" anarchist.nexus Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus
Joined: 2025-12-23
#29 · Quote Reply

You could read a little about copyright law in different countries to find out how commercial and non-commercial use of copyrighted content works in each one. And if you feel like it and find a bit of spare time after that, come back here and read the comments again. That is if by then you feel qualified to understand them.

just because you got your feelings hurt doesn't mean I'm not right, or you're not an idiot. nothing I said was factually untrue, you knob.

0
flambonkscious sh.itjust.works flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-06-10
#30 · Quote Reply

I can't hear you over the sound of my 0,2 ratio

Damn, for a hit n run that's pretty high

3
Post Reply
Back to top