Well, that's one.

If you don't like Debian, go fork yourself.

MX, ubuntu, astra, mint, raspbian, kali, elementary, tails, Q4

or, in short: debian

That's only one

Good.. you may life.

Well you see ubuntu is the same as debian so you shouldn't use debian because of canonicals snaps, stance on ai, and advertising in the terminal.

There are many Debian based distros, just all the Ubuntu flavors is enough

You're being a bit unstable right now.

You mean ununalive

Ununix

Those are based on Debian. Not Debian. If you ask for a debian and I give you pop_os, you'd probably not like it.

And flavours are flavours, not distro. It's the same distro, just different settings

This reads as sarcasm but is generally valid points...? I guess that explains why people downvoted it

It's valid against ubuntu, but I don't see why it would touch debian users?

“Name 3 package managers”

The world's oldest profession.

Arch is also a valid answer, btw.

Apologies, friend. It was all mint in good fun.

Apt
Rpm
Pacman

I think maybe you meant "should use Debian"?

Nix Lix Guix

dnf yay snap flatpak emerge... nix?

up2date

Ok guys. This is the comment chain. Let’s do it. 🍿🗡️⚔️🤺

Twix

Rpm is really more analogous to dpkg. Does the local work, doesn't talk to repositories.

Apt to...not yum anymore. checks Dnf.

I'm not sure which one would properly call a "package manager", the apt/dnf role or the rpm/dpkg role.

snix (rest in piss)

UwUnix

The term I use is "Debian family", "Red Hat family", etc.

That was too easy. Name 10 things that cause endless flame wars on linux!

systemd

Then, if we are to follow that logic of excluding derivatives, then we get NixOS, Arch, LFS, TinyCore Linux, Gentoo, Debian (of course!) and... I give up; what else is out there?

And I use Debian, just to put it on record.

I see that reading now.

I don’t know what sarcasm is anymore.

you think

Well you see ubuntu is the same as debian so you shouldn't use debian either, because debian also has canonical's snaps, stance on ai, and advertising in the terminal.

would work?

Bazzite, Debian, Linux Mint...Arch.... Ubuntu....

That's five I could think of off top of my head.

I got 50% right, okay!

I'm not sure whether you really mean Debian has all those issues or if it's sarcasm, but otherwise it's clearer you're not recommending Debian

There's two variants of Debian: Debian, and "damn, this distro is not as flexible as I'd like, I guess I should have just installed Debian in the first place".

Debian does not have snaps (I suppose you could install snappy, but that is the case for most distributions).

Debian also doesn't have canonical ads in its command outputs.

And debian does nor allow LLM contributions to all its related stuff, i.e. debian packaging, software projects, websites, docs, and communication.
Generally debian is pretty ai-negative where ubuntu is very ai-positive.

So this is continuing the sarcasm because obviously it's all clearly wrong.

Yeah, that, ubuntu. Poor choice on my part.

thats nyarch, the only distro rumored to not be based on debian

Sarcasm died and left it's place to be occupied by literalism. The most ridiculous things have become literal.

Void, Solus, Exherbo, Suse, Fedora...

NO U

Once you get to Ubuntu, just continue down that rabbit hole of flavors. Kubuntu, Lubuntu, Xubuntu, Bananafanafubuntu, etc...

SUSE, RHEL...

The saddest part on your comment was that Suse was my first distro and it did not register in my mind. As for Fedore, althoug I still insist calling it Red Hat.

Hannah Montana Linux

Uwuntu