RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
‘Never seen this level of objection’: Scotland pushes back against datacentre boom
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
Zombie feddit.uk Zombie@feddit.uk
Joined: 2024-06-01
Quote

‘Never seen this level of objection’: Scotland pushes back against datacentre boo

46   Original
Olap Moderator Olap@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-02
#2 · Quote Reply

This centre is massive! If they wanted a smaller center I'd bet it wouldn't be as objected

And, Scotland regularly curtails it's wind production. Scotland hosting these centers makes sense. But, nobody wants this next to where they live, I totally am a NIMBY wrt this too

8
Zombie feddit.uk Zombie@feddit.uk
Joined: 2024-06-01
#3 · Quote Reply

This centre is massive! If they wanted a smaller center I'd bet it wouldn't be as objected And, Scotland regularly curtails it's wind production. Scotland hosting these centers makes sense. But, nobody wants this next to where they live, I totally am a NIMBY wrt this too

By being ridiculous they can now be seen to be "reasonable" and "compromise" by proposing a slightly smaller footprint.

A footprint that if they'd proposed originally would still likely have garnered objections but using this tactic could result in objection depleting because the less radically minded will think a fair compromise has been reached.

They're evil, but they're not daft.

6
Olap Moderator Olap@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-02
#4 · Quote Reply

By being ridiculous they can now be seen to be "reasonable" and "compromise" by proposing a slightly smaller footprint. A footprint that if they'd proposed originally would still likely have garnered objections but using this tactic could result in objection depleting because the less radically minded will think a fair compromise has been reached. They're evil, but they're not daft.

Gonna backfire I suspect. Moratorium looks almost certain at this stage

8
decolo piefed.social decolo@piefed.social
Joined: 2026-06-29
#5 · Quote Reply

By being ridiculous they can now be seen to be "reasonable" and "compromise" by proposing a slightly smaller footprint. A footprint that if they'd proposed originally would still likely have garnered objections but using this tactic could result in objection depleting because the less radically minded will think a fair compromise has been reached. They're evil, but they're not daft.

That's how things might have worked 2 years ago. At this point hardball tactics like this are only going to backfire.

4
linzid83 lemmy.world linzid83@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-12
#6 · Quote Reply

Good!!

2
Post Reply
Back to top