RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
China sends airborne wind turbine up 4,000m to generate power
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
poVoq slrpnk.net poVoq@slrpnk.net
Joined: 2022-09-19
Quote

28   Original
HerbGrower slrpnk.net HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
Joined: 2026-07-09
#2 · Quote Reply

Random thought, mostly because they are cool. Could you use a hot air balloon instead of helium? If its generating that much power surely it can heat the air inside it using just a tiny portion of that.

And because I have been browsing too much non credible defense - if Russia attacks these balloons would cut down their planes.

4
poVoq Moderator poVoq@slrpnk.net
Joined: 2022-09-19
#3 · Quote Reply

Random thought, mostly because they are cool. Could you use a hot air balloon instead of helium? If its generating that much power surely it can heat the air inside it using just a tiny portion of that. And because I have been browsing too much non credible defense - if Russia attacks these balloons would cut down their planes.

Hot air doesn't have very good lift. Better would be to produce hydrogen via electrolysis.

4
HerbGrower slrpnk.net HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
Joined: 2026-07-09
#4 · Quote Reply

Hot air doesn't have very good lift. Better would be to produce hydrogen via electrolysis.

I assume the explodey problem is why they didn't use hydrogen but yeah if the risk is low enough that could be a good choice.

2
poVoq Moderator poVoq@slrpnk.net
Joined: 2022-09-19
#5 · Quote Reply

I assume the explodey problem is why they didn't use hydrogen but yeah if the risk is low enough that could be a good choice.

For an explosion you need a well mixed oxygen + hydrogen atmosphere, which is nearly impossible to create in a blimp. Even the old Hindenburg did not explode, but rather its highly flammable nitro-cellulose skin burned and most of the Hydrogen likely escaped without ever catching fire.

3
Post Reply
Back to top