RetroFed Forums
Your home away from modern life.
Luanti removed from Google Play due to baseless AI copyright notice
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
cm0002 mander.xyz cm0002@mander.xyz
Joined: 2025-10-25
Quote

73   Original
vala lemmy.dbzer0.com vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2025-07-24
#2 · (edited) Quote Reply

Luanti’s Android app is currently not available on the Google Play Store due to a baseless DMCA notice filed on behalf of Microsoft by Tracer.AI, alleging that Luanti infringes Minecraft’s copyright. The Luanti app does not contain any proprietary code or assets, from Minecraft or otherwise.

We received an identical notice from the same company in 2023 and successfully appealed against it. This company also filed a similar notice this year against an indie game with similar voxel art style by the name of Allumeria.

What the hell

28
WhoIzDisIz lemmy.today WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today
Joined: 2026-04-27
#3 · Quote Reply

Luanti’s Android app is currently not available on the Google Play Store due to a baseless DMCA notice filed on behalf of Microsoft by Tracer.AI, alleging that Luanti infringes Minecraft’s copyright. The Luanti app does not contain any proprietary code or assets, from Minecraft or otherwise. We received an identical notice from the same company in 2023 and successfully appealed against it. This...

Repeat offense seems like something they could sue for harassment over.

20
Kissaki programming.dev Kissaki@programming.dev
Joined: 2023-06-11
#4 · Quote Reply

Luanti’s Android app is currently not available on the Google Play Store due to a baseless DMCA notice filed on behalf of Microsoft by Tracer.AI, alleging that Luanti infringes Minecraft’s copyright. The Luanti app does not contain any proprietary code or assets, from Minecraft or otherwise. We received an identical notice from the same company in 2023 and successfully appealed against it. This...

I wonder if a collective effort to track who places unjustified DMCA claims and in whose name could change anything. Making working with those kinds of companies a publicity risk.

9
Jesus_666 lemmy.world Jesus_666@lemmy.world
Joined: 2024-04-03
#5 · Quote Reply

I wonder if a collective effort to track who places unjustified DMCA claims and in whose name could change anything. Making working with those kinds of companies a publicity risk.

It's not as if most people care. Nintendo's hyper-litigiousness also hasn't hurt their image of the wholesome games company run by people whose main goal is to give the market good games.

The truth is that by and large nobody gives a shit about fraudulent DMCA claims, not even the DMCA provision that outlaws them.

11
mindbleach sh.itjust.works mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-08-27
#6 · Quote Reply

I wonder if a collective effort to track who places unjustified DMCA claims and in whose name could change anything. Making working with those kinds of companies a publicity risk.

See SLAPP and "vexatious litigation." You can in fact fuck around so hard that you're no longer permitted to file legal claims without a third party vouching for you.

3
Kissaki programming.dev Kissaki@programming.dev
Joined: 2023-06-11
#7 · Quote Reply

It's not as if most people care. Nintendo's hyper-litigiousness also hasn't hurt their image of the wholesome games company run by people whose main goal is to give the market good games. The truth is that by and large nobody gives a shit about fraudulent DMCA claims, not even the DMCA provision that outlaws them.

It's rarely majorities leading to change. It's critical mass. It just needs to be enough.

3
Post Reply
Back to top