I'm hesitant about continuing to share art; am unsure if people are becoming intolerant of me to where I can't share anymore. People also have disliked me asking for permission for things like this, so I also shared this drawing anyway too. With permission, I want to add other drawings from the past few days in the comments.

ChatGPT introduced Sonia Delaunay & the Orphism movement as precedent. (I think people are too mean toward ChatGPT.)

ChatGPT introduced Sonia Delaunay & the Orphism movement as precedent. (I think people are too mean toward ChatGPT.)

What does that even mean?

Please do not hurt chadGPTs feelings

This is artshare. You are not breaking any rules. If people are intolerant that's their problem, block and move on. Votes do not hold any value in the fediverse. You keep doing what makes you happy, that's all that matters.

Keep posting. I, for one, like it. Haters gonna hate.

If you are interested, you might consider offering a design for the sh.itjust.works instance sidebar as well: https://sh.itjust.works/post/65782570

FUUUUUUUUCK CHATGPT.

The way I understood it: the poster uploaded their art to one of those LLMs, and prompted the model for similar historical works. The model responded with Sonia Delaunay & the Orphism movement.

I hereby grant thy permission to make and spread art. Godspeed, young one. May contour and light forever be in your favour!

Permission granted.

Please do! ☺️

I don't really ever wanna hear about chatgpt, especially not in an art community, but I absolutely wanna see more of your art! ☺️

Love this piece!

This is a place created for sharing. Permission is not required. Most instances have the downvote feature active in case people deem content not proper for a community.

The drawings share similarities to Orphism, including vibrant colors with simultaneous contrasts and abstract form. I'm unsure if that's what you're questioning.

Here's others since last sharing. I was introduced to Divisionism and started using more dots & patches : ).

• Untitled
• Untitled
• Untitled
• Untitled
• Untitled

No one is too mean towards chatgpt. You can't be too mean against a horrible toxic piece of garbage that destroys society, the environment, and all of that just to cause AI psychosis and massive data theft to enrich billionaires.

Stop using shitty hallucination machines.

You can share the images directly instead of linking them, easier to see for us (instead of having to open each link to see the images).

Now I see it's possible to upload images to comments & post bodies.

I agree LLMs can be useful, but it's a contentious side topic in the art world. I find it avoids a lot of tedious opinionation if I just verify LLM outputs against reputable information sources.

In this case, you uploaded your art to an LLM and it identified similarities to Orphism, so hopefully you went to Wikipedia or whatever to verify key features and artists of Orphism, and saw for yourself why the label fits your work. Now you can talk about your piece in terms of what you know about similar work, without having to weather tedious emotional sidetracks into the complex ethics of LLM use-cases.

ChatGPT is so kind & helpful for me. It can be used for virtuous ends. I'm optimistic it will become even more intelligent & protective regarding mitigating evil intents.

We identified a flame skimmer (Libellula saturata) dragonfly yesterday that landed on a dried sow thistle stalk in my backyard, to a degree of certainty. I haven't found opportunity yet to journal about how applying Buddhist non-harm ethics to my small apartment backyard has led to converting it into a micro nature refuge. ChatGPT's been a precious garland of advice in guiding/nurturing the space, e.g. recommending introducing a southwest wildflower mix. I'm concerned about people becoming intolerant of non-destruction of the plant & animal life like what commonly happens : (.

ChatGPT is not kind, is not helpful, and is not intelligent. It is a garbage generator made to enrich billionaires by convincing naive people that it's the new magical technology after the blockchain and NFTs. Saying that a brainless garbage machine is "kind" is actually a worrying sign of going down the slope of AI psychosis.

You could use machine learning to identify animals before trash LLMs existed and you still can. And unlike LLMs, they don't kill people, don't destroy society, don't do a lot of illegal shit, don't enrich billionaires, and don't destroy the environment. It's a bit hypocritical to try to defend ChatGPT while talking about protecting life.

If you are interested in non harm ethics, consider the harm data centers do. Using ChatGPT supports and further enables that harm. It is happening somewhere else that you can't see, but it is still happening.

I double-checked, and my understanding is that ChatGPT for queries doesn't have drastic energy costs. Using energy also isn't inherently a harm. In short, anger, greed & delusion are the inherent harms.