| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » Not The Onion |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
CaptainBasculin
lemmy.dbzer0.com
CaptainBasculin@lemmy.dbzer0.com Joined: 2026-01-17 |
|
||
| 248 Original | |||
|
Tomtits
lemmy.dbzer0.com
blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com Joined: 2025-03-10 |
Thought it was this Viz for a second |
||
| 16 | |||
|
davidgro
lemmy.world
davidgro@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-13 |
Did they send one to Clorox also? |
||
| 53 | |||
_haha_oh_wow_
sh.itjust.works
_haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.worksJoined: 2023-06-12 |
Companies need to start getting punished for fraudulent takedown notices. |
||
| 123 | |||
|
DarkSirrush
piefed.ca
DarkSirrush@piefed.ca Joined: 2025-06-07 |
Thought it was this Viz for a second https://viz.co.uk/
Oh dont worry, I am sure viz media tries to DMCA them regularly. |
||
| 8 | |||
πΈπππ
infosec.pub
01189998819991197253@infosec.pubJoined: 2023-06-04 |
They're next. |
||
| 32 | |||
πΈπππ
infosec.pub
01189998819991197253@infosec.pubJoined: 2023-06-04 |
This has to be a joke. They can't be that stupid. |
||
| 26 | |||
|
Tanoh
lemmy.world
Tanoh@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-24 |
This has to be a joke. They can't be that stupid.
Most likely it is just automated and matching text, which should be illegal. |
||
| 32 | |||
|
Tomtits
lemmy.dbzer0.com
blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com Joined: 2025-03-10 |
Oh dont worry, I am sure viz media tries to DMCA them regularly.
I can only imagine what their response would be |
||
| 3 | |||
|
kbobabob
lemmy.dbzer0.com
kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com Joined: 2025-06-15 |
Most likely it is just automated and matching text, which should be illegal.
Start fining companies a percentage of their yearly revenue and don't let them pay it over 5-10 years like they recently did for Meta. |
||
| 16 | |||
|
Aceticon
lemmy.dbzer0.com
Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com Joined: 2024-12-06 |
Companies need to start getting punished for fraudulent takedown notices.
Not a Lawyer. I'm wondering if a false DMCA notice is a form of slander/libel? |
||
| 13 | |||
_haha_oh_wow_
sh.itjust.works
_haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.worksJoined: 2023-06-12 |
Not a Lawyer. I'm wondering if a false DMCA notice is a form of slander/libel?
It could be considered a lot of things if there were lawyers willing to test out new legal theories to stop them, however as far as I am aware, nobody has really tried. |
||
| 12 | |||
|
VitoRobles
lemmy.today
VitoRobles@lemmy.today Joined: 2025-01-26 |
Here's their post (the one in the screenshot) Are we allowed to see Biz Media's actual DMCA takedown or are those things typically not shared? |
||
| 6 | |||
|
CaptainBasculin
lemmy.dbzer0.com
CaptainBasculin@lemmy.dbzer0.com Joined: 2026-01-17 |
Here's their post (the one in the screenshot) https://www.bleachbit.org/anime Are we allowed to see Biz Media's actual DMCA takedown or are those things typically not shared?
The notice at the bottom is the one sent by them, and people that recieve them are allowed to share them publically. |
||
| 7 | |||
|
curlywurly
piefed.social
curlywurly@piefed.social Joined: 2026-02-01 |
this is #funny |
||
| 2 | |||
|
SleeplessCityLights
programming.dev
SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev Joined: 2025-10-03 |
Say you let them take you to court and don't bother to show up or get a lawyer, will the default ruling follow the law or the corperation? |
||
| 4 | |||
Kangae_Hishiryo
scribe.disroot.org
Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.orgJoined: 2026-04-13 |
This has to be a joke. They can't be that stupid.
I found before that the company that does this apparently is just one person with an AI agent, because they ("Remove Your Media LLC") give a street direction but there's... Only a Walmart. |
||
| 6 | |||
πΈπππ
infosec.pub
01189998819991197253@infosec.pubJoined: 2023-06-04 |
I found before that the company that does this apparently is just one person with an AI agent, because they ("Remove Your Media LLC") give a street direction but there's... Only a Walmart.
Maybe they work out of the Walmart? Times are tough. Maybe they work the register as their agent works your register (see what I did there? αΆ¦βΛ‘Λ‘ Λ‘α΅α΅α΅α΅). |
||
| 2 | |||
Hanrahan
slrpnk.net
hanrahan@slrpnk.netJoined: 2023-03-14 |
Thought it was this Viz for a second https://viz.co.uk/
haha so did I and then wondered if they had unfeasibly large testicles |
||
| 1 | |||
|
Funkt4st1c
lemmy.world
Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world Joined: 2026-07-30 |
Say you let them take you to court and don't bother to show up or get a lawyer, will the default ruling follow the law or the corperation?
If only one side makes an argument im pretty sure its just the judges call |
||
| 5 | |||
|
SleeplessCityLights
programming.dev
SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev Joined: 2025-10-03 |
If only one side makes an argument im pretty sure its just the judges call
Yes, a default ruling. Would the judge side with the party that showed up, even if it is clear that it is non-sense. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
fartographer
lemmy.world
fartographer@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-06-29 |
this is #funny
#Yes |
||
| 1 | |||
TheEmpireStrikesDak
thelemmy.club
DakRalter@thelemmy.clubJoined: 2023-06-15 |
This has to be a joke. They can't be that stupid.
From what I know there are a lot of fraudulent "companies" that are sending false DMCAs to anyone and everyone on YouTube (the channel deephumor is documenting them). They're copyright claiming on behalf of people they aren't even authorised to act on behalf on. They copyright claim people just talking about anime, no clips from animes, just talking. Whether they're actually authorised by Viz media or not, who knows. There's this Remove your Media, there's also another called The Media Entertainment or something just claiming stuff as their own to silence critics. YouTube just allows them all since it's just run by bots now. |
||
| 2 | |||
TheEmpireStrikesDak
thelemmy.club
DakRalter@thelemmy.clubJoined: 2023-06-15 |
Most likely it is just automated and matching text, which should be illegal.
Well it should be, because when you file a dmca takedown request, you have to state under penalty of perjury that your complaint is accurate to the best of your knowledge and that you are the copyright holder or authorised by the copyright holder. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
Tanoh
lemmy.world
Tanoh@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-24 |
Well it should be, because when you file a dmca takedown request, you have to state under penalty of perjury that your complaint is accurate to the best of your knowledge and that you are the copyright holder or authorised by the copyright holder.
Yeah, but laws don't apply to rich corporations or people. |
||
| 1 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |