RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
Can you imagine a universe without a new 'Star Trek' on the horizon?
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
billmason startrek.website billmason@startrek.website
Joined: 2026-01-16
Quote

I thought Ira Behr's and Anton Mount's comments were interesting.

30   Original
TrackinDaKraken lemmy.world DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-02-26
#2 · Quote Reply

Yeah. Not a big fan of the recent shows. I watch, but I skip some episodes and they're not great, generally.

5
agentTeiko piefed.social agentTeiko@piefed.social
Joined: 2026-01-29
#3 · (edited) Quote Reply

Yeah I did in 2005 honestly let it rest for a bit and have them try again without Kurtzman and JJ sticking their fingers into it

13
JohnnyEnzyme piefed.social JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-06-11
#4 · Quote Reply

I grew up watching reruns of the first series, and have enjoyed various stretches & episodes of the later series, but honestly, it wouldn't be any great tragedy to me if the franchise died a natural death.

I mean, as we've come to learn, the whole premise was an interesting thought experiment, but hugely flawed. Roddenberry in no way 'practiced what he preached' in real life, and space travel is almost certainly complete pie in the sky nonsense from multiple angles. I won't bother going in to the current existential & sustainability threats that will render it unlikely, but there's also this massive problem.

Going somewhat against my own opinion above is the fact that some of the later series drifted in to grittier, more unpleasant directions, and that does seem appropriate for where the world is now. That said, such is not particularly in line with ST's naive optimism that ran through the first few series. It's not on brand, for whatever that's worth.

Other than marketing, finances, and studios recycling absolutely everything they can if it's projected to make money, it seems completely appropriate for some other series to have a say, altho I imagine it being darker and more apocalyptic.

I still love aspects of the earlier series (and books... there were some fine novels), but I just don't care about the franchise continuing on, anymore.

1
LastYearsIrritant sopuli.xyz LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
Joined: 2025-02-20
#5 · Quote Reply

Just let it pass on. Star Trek ended with Voyager.

If you want to make space shows, that's fine, just don't bother calling it star trek.

Or do, I don't care. It's not going to change how I live.

-4
ProfThadBach lemmy.world ProfThadBach@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-06-20
#6 · Quote Reply

It is turning int o WH40K.

1
Tiresia slrpnk.net Tiresia@slrpnk.net
Joined: 2024-07-16
#7 · Quote Reply

I grew up watching reruns of the first series, and have enjoyed various stretches & episodes of the later series, but honestly, it wouldn't be any great tragedy to me if the franchise died a natural death. I mean, as we've come to learn, the whole premise was an interesting thought experiment, but hugely flawed. Roddenberry in no way 'practiced what he preached' in real life, and space trav...

I couldn't disagree more. Roddenberry is just some guy, Star Trek has always been so much larger than him. And as The Orville demonstrates, there is no justification for a 2020s star trek to be grittier than a star trek that aired between the Korean and Vietnam war, with the second red scare with the existential threat of nuclear warfare.

Its utopian vision of the future has a backstory of humans fighting each other to near extinction in the Eugenics War and WW3, because that seemed where things were headed. The present has always been gritty, but Star Trek used to be about zooming out past the horrors of the present day to imagine a brighter future.

The franchise has simply switched hands from being propaganda by a bunch of left-leaning weirdos to being propaganda for huge corporations and the state they wear as a trench coat.

It is entirely possible to write Star Trek today that is as left-wing (relative to its time) and utopian as it used to be. The owners of the IP simply will not permit that.

9
JohnnyEnzyme piefed.social JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-06-11
#8 · Quote Reply

I couldn't disagree more. Roddenberry is just some guy, Star Trek has always been so much larger than him. And as The Orville demonstrates, there is no justification for a 2020s star trek to be grittier than a star trek that aired between the Korean and Vietnam war, with the second red scare with the existential threat of nuclear warfare. Its utopian vision of the future has a backstory of huma...

Roddenberry is just some guy

He was indeed assisted by a brilliant, resourceful team of production people and actors, but yeah... okay. Lol.

Anyway, I'm glad you still find something to like, but I really couldn't give a toss about more ST.

1
anticonnor lemmy.world anticonnor@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-09-28
#9 · Quote Reply

The best reason to keep cranking out new ST shows is to give some future Lower Decks type show something to reference.

1
James R Kirk startrek.website Kirk@startrek.website
Joined: 2025-03-01
#10 · Quote Reply

Yeah I did in 2005 honestly let it rest for a bit and have them try again without Kurtzman and JJ sticking their fingers into it

Yeah I thouroughly enjoyed this new generation helmed by Kurtzman but I'm also ok with letting it sit, and not trying to force the next MCU or whatever.

7
James R Kirk startrek.website Kirk@startrek.website
Joined: 2025-03-01
#11 · (edited) Quote Reply

Just let it pass on. Star Trek ended with Voyager. If you want to make space shows, that's fine, just don't bother calling it star trek. Or do, I don't care. It's not going to change how I live.

I love this, because it's exactly the same sentiment "fans" when TNG premiered.

7
James R Kirk startrek.website Kirk@startrek.website
Joined: 2025-03-01
#12 · Quote Reply

Yeah. Not a big fan of the recent shows. I watch, but I skip some episodes and they're not great, generally.

3
James R Kirk startrek.website Kirk@startrek.website
Joined: 2025-03-01
#13 · Quote Reply

I couldn't disagree more. Roddenberry is just some guy, Star Trek has always been so much larger than him. And as The Orville demonstrates, there is no justification for a 2020s star trek to be grittier than a star trek that aired between the Korean and Vietnam war, with the second red scare with the existential threat of nuclear warfare. Its utopian vision of the future has a backstory of huma...

dare I ask... gritty? If anything the new series (except Picard arguably) were a hyper hug fest compared to TOS, DS9 and Voyager

3
agentTeiko piefed.social agentTeiko@piefed.social
Joined: 2026-01-29
#14 · Quote Reply

Yeah I thouroughly enjoyed this new generation helmed by Kurtzman but I'm also ok with letting it sit, and not trying to force the next MCU or whatever.

Yeah I liked some of it. Only issue I had with it in general was it has very low rewatchability with it being so serialized vs how ds9 did it where they found the perfect blend of serial and epistolic.

9
LastYearsIrritant sopuli.xyz LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
Joined: 2025-02-20
#15 · Quote Reply

I love this, because it's exactly the same sentiment "fans" when TNG premiered.

Yup, I had the exact thought when it premiered. I was proven wrong.

Then they made a bunch of crappy movies, and a bunch of crappy shows. It really has run its course.

Heck DS9 and Voyager could also have been a pass for me, but they definitely had their moments.

0
Anti_Iridium lemmy.world Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-26
#16 · Quote Reply

Yeah I liked some of it. Only issue I had with it in general was it has very low rewatchability with it being so serialized vs how ds9 did it where they found the perfect blend of serial and epistolic.

I have rewatched lower decks a lot

3
Anti_Iridium lemmy.world Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-26
#17 · Quote Reply

Just let it pass on. Star Trek ended with Voyager. If you want to make space shows, that's fine, just don't bother calling it star trek. Or do, I don't care. It's not going to change how I live.

Have you seen our lord and savior, Lower Decks?

4
FluidBeef quokk.au FluidBeef@quokk.au
Joined: 2025-08-12
Banned
#18 · Quote Reply

Yes. Star Trek is a good example of when a studio decided they had a “franchise” that they’d milk forever remorselessly regardless of whether anyone had a compelling idea for it or not.

4
James R Kirk startrek.website Kirk@startrek.website
Joined: 2025-03-01
#19 · (edited) Quote Reply

Yeah I liked some of it. Only issue I had with it in general was it has very low rewatchability with it being so serialized vs how ds9 did it where they found the perfect blend of serial and epistolic.

While I agree with what you said it also took me like ten years before my first DS9 rewatch so I'll withhold judgement for a while

4
Valentine Angell lemmy.world f1error@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-08-23
#20 · Quote Reply

In its current hands, the next "new" Star Trek is going to be an alt-right/GQP mess. And it's going to kill the Star Trek franchise forever.

And if the Paramount/WB merger happens, it's going to kill DC Comics as well. It's gonna suck big time!

11
agentTeiko piefed.social agentTeiko@piefed.social
Joined: 2026-01-29
#21 · Quote Reply

I have rewatched lower decks a lot

Yeah that is the exception to the rule of new trek but also one of the few that really is epistolic strange new worlds also kinda of falls under that for the first 2 seasons.

2
agentTeiko piefed.social agentTeiko@piefed.social
Joined: 2026-01-29
#22 · Quote Reply

While I agree with what you said it also took me like ten years before my first DS9 rewatch so I'll withhold judgement for a while

Well I hope your rewatch goes well. I have a star trek playlist that I just put on shuffle so far ds9 holds up to the shuffle so i feel like that is a good test.

1
usernamefactory lemmy.ca usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-06-11
#23 · Quote Reply

dare I ask... gritty? If anything the new series (except Picard arguably) were a hyper hug fest compared to TOS, DS9 and Voyager

Yeah, I don’t get this complaint. By the end of Discovery, my partner started referring to the episode wrap ups as “Care Bears moments” because of how saccharine they could get.

Disco and Picard both got pretty dark in their first seasons, but that’s a decade ago, and not appreciably darker than DS9 was known for.

3
SteleTrovilo beehaw.org SteleTrovilo@beehaw.org
Joined: 2023-01-06
#24 · Quote Reply

Yeah, I don’t get this complaint. By the end of Discovery, my partner started referring to the episode wrap ups as “Care Bears moments” because of how saccharine they could get. Disco and Picard both got pretty dark in their first seasons, but that’s a decade ago, and not appreciably darker than DS9 was known for.

Picard S1 was quite a bit darker than other Trek. Pointless death in just about every episode, even an on-screen eye pull moment.

I love Star Trek old and new, but I sincerely hope the writers who killed off Hugh and Icheb are never allowed near the franchise again.

1
James R Kirk startrek.website Kirk@startrek.website
Joined: 2025-03-01
#25 · (edited) Quote Reply

Yeah, I don’t get this complaint. By the end of Discovery, my partner started referring to the episode wrap ups as “Care Bears moments” because of how saccharine they could get. Disco and Picard both got pretty dark in their first seasons, but that’s a decade ago, and not appreciably darker than DS9 was known for.

Honestly nothing in Disco comes anywhere close to "Chain of Command". Either they mean something else by "gritty" or they didn't watch the actual shows and just watched youtube reviews.

3
usernamefactory lemmy.ca usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-06-11
#26 · Quote Reply

Picard S1 was quite a bit darker than other Trek. Pointless death in just about every episode, even an on-screen eye pull moment. I love Star Trek old and new, but I sincerely hope the writers who killed off Hugh and Icheb are never allowed near the franchise again.

Honestly, the eye gouging didn't hit me all that hard. I'll have to do a rewatch someday and see how I feel. But sure, if it were 2020 I wouldn't really bother arguing against the "gritty" description. Looking back at this point, only about 10% of the Kurtzman era had that kind of tone.

2
usernamefactory lemmy.ca usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-06-11
#27 · Quote Reply

Honestly nothing in Disco comes anywhere close to "Chain of Command". Either they mean something else by "gritty" or they didn't watch the actual shows and just watched youtube reviews.

Picard's torturer engaging in a "take your child to work day" exercise like it's a normal 9 to 5 is so chilling.

2
James R Kirk startrek.website Kirk@startrek.website
Joined: 2025-03-01
#28 · Quote Reply

Picard's torturer engaging in a "take your child to work day" exercise like it's a normal 9 to 5 is so chilling.

Gritty, even!

1
piskertariot lemmy.world piskertariot@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-15
#29 · Quote Reply

I love this, because it's exactly the same sentiment "fans" when TNG premiered.

When TNG came out, all we had was 3 seasons of TOS and 2 of TAS.

People didn't like TNG because it was new and different.

People don't like Trek post Voyager, because it sucks and it's bad.

-1
James R Kirk startrek.website Kirk@startrek.website
Joined: 2025-03-01
#30 · Quote Reply

When TNG came out, all we had was 3 seasons of TOS and 2 of TAS. People didn't like TNG because it was new and different. People don't like Trek post Voyager, because it sucks and it's bad.

1
Post Reply
Back to top