| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » China |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Hotznplotzn
lemmy.sdf.org
Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org Joined: 2025-01-29 |
[...] On Sept. 15, 2026, China’s new Regulations on Exit and Entry Administration has entered into force. Although the regulations do not create a blanket new exit ban1 power over foreign visitors, they do further formalize a wider legal system in which the boundaries of prohibited conduct are difficult to anticipate and meaningful avenues for challenging government action are limited. [...] HRF’s Tyranny Tracker classifies China as a fully authoritarian regime, with its immigration, public security, state security, and judicial authorities operating within the same system, led by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Formal procedures exist, but their application — particularly in politically sensitive or national security matters — is not subject to the independent scrutiny that travelers might expect in democratic jurisdictions. [...] Travelers may face an exit ban not because they are accused of wrongdoing, but because restricting them creates leverage over another person, an investigation, or a foreign government. [...] Relatives of people under investigation — including minors — may themselves be prevented from leaving. For example, Gao Zhen, a lawful US resident, was detained in China during a holiday trip, and his son, a US citizen, was also unable to leave due to an effective travel ban on Gao’s wife. Therefore, travel risk cannot be assessed solely by examining the traveler’s own conduct. Relatives and close associates of human rights defenders, dissidents, people sought by the Chinese government, or individuals involved in politically sensitive proceedings may have a higher risk exposure than ordinary travelers. [...] The relational exposure is bidirectional. A traveler may attract scrutiny because of another person, but may also expose local residents or their relatives to risk through any meetings, communications, photographs, or retained records. Given the expansive number of plainclothed police and government officials and the PRC’s intense surveillance system, any contact can be easily identified and subsequently face questioning, coercion, or even detention. A foreign visitor’s successful departure does not, therefore, establish that the interaction caused no harm. This transferred risk is particularly acute in the Uyghur Region and Tibet, because overseas contact may itself be treated as a security indicator. [...] Recommendations:
[...] There is no expectation of privacy on mobile or other networks in the PRC, as internet and mobile service providers are legally required to provide intelligence and security services with on-demand access to data and networks. Adopt enhanced digital security measures before departure and throughout your trip [more recommendations are on the linked site]. [...] |
||
| 5 Original | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |