| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index
» Privacy
Page 1 of 4 Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4 Next Last » |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Oh_Sheila
lemmy.zip
iloveyou@lemmy.zip Joined: 2026-09-05 |
This is unacceptable. And I’m sick of all the fucking workarounds to maintain basic privacy. |
||
| 346 Original | |||
ianhclark510
lemmy.blahaj.zone
ianhclark510@lemmy.blahaj.zoneJoined: 2023-06-09 |
Sigh, guess it’s time to bust open a pre-code copy of ‘How to build Linux from scratch’ |
||
| 59 | |||
|
Oh_Sheila
lemmy.zip
iloveyou@lemmy.zip Joined: 2026-09-05 |
Sigh, guess it’s time to bust open a pre-code copy of ‘How to build Linux from scratch’
I fucking guess. I am at the point where I will take my children out of school if they are forced to do face scans or give any ID in order to participate and learn. I’m almost at the point where I would rather lose my job than comply with this |
||
| 26 | |||
|
crandall
lemmy.today
crandall@lemmy.today Joined: 2026-08-11 |
If it does it will be the last thing it does |
||
| 15 | |||
artyom
piefed.social
artyom@piefed.socialJoined: 2025-06-08 |
I fucking guess. I am at the point where I will take my children out of school if they are forced to do face scans or give any ID in order to participate and learn. I’m almost at the point where I would rather lose my job than comply with this
Children don't usually have ID. You only need to provide ID to prove you're an adult. |
||
| -3 | |||
|
eldavi
lemmy.ml
eldavi@lemmy.ml Joined: 2023-07-18 |
Sigh, guess it’s time to bust open a pre-code copy of ‘How to build Linux from scratch’
i'm going to switch to devuan since systemd already pre-complied wo anyone commanding them to. |
||
| 9 | |||
artyom
piefed.social
artyom@piefed.socialJoined: 2025-06-08 |
It won't. Ever. Because Linux. |
||
| 7 | |||
southsamurai (he/him/pronoun agnostic)
sh.itjust.works
southsamurai@sh.itjust.worksJoined: 2023-06-19 |
It won't. Ever. Because Linux.
If you think that some asshole won't be willing to legislate that away, think again. It might be the last refuge, but it is entirely possible to shut that down |
||
| 2 | |||
|
monovergent
lemmy.ml
monovergent@lemmy.ml Joined: 2023-11-27 |
My collection of hoarded media waits eagerly if this forces me to say goodbye to the internet outside of work obligations |
||
| 19 | |||
|
Oh_Sheila
lemmy.zip
iloveyou@lemmy.zip Joined: 2026-09-05 |
Children don't usually have ID. You only need to provide ID to prove you're an adult.
I’m 100% not convinced that it will stay this way. This, to me, is a push towards ID verification. Age verification is a first step. To me, it feels more like a step towards building an infrastructure to track any user |
||
| 25 | |||
|
lennee
lemmy.world
lennee@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-06-29 |
snickers in arch linux |
||
| 7 | |||
|
gandalfthewhite
lemmy.ml
gandalfthewhite@lemmy.ml Joined: 2026-08-24 |
If you think that some asshole won't be willing to legislate that away, think again. It might be the last refuge, but it is entirely possible to shut that down
You can fine public orgs but it will just go underground unless they permanantly shut off all internet infrastructure which they will not do |
||
| 7 | |||
artyom
piefed.social
artyom@piefed.socialJoined: 2025-06-08 |
If you think that some asshole won't be willing to legislate that away, think again. It might be the last refuge, but it is entirely possible to shut that down
Legislate whatever you want, you can't stop free software. |
||
| 13 | |||
artyom
piefed.social
artyom@piefed.socialJoined: 2025-06-08 |
I’m 100% not convinced that it will stay this way. This, to me, is a push towards ID verification. Age verification is a first step. To me, it feels more like a step towards building an infrastructure to track any user
It won't but that's the way it is now. |
||
| 3 | |||
|
atrielienz
lemmy.world
atrielienz@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-08-05 |
Doubtful. The only Windows computer I have is the work laptop and they're unlikely to be worried about making corps verify their ages. |
||
| 5 | |||
eremophila
lemmy.zip
eremophila@lemmy.zipJoined: 2026-07-20 |
Will someone just hurry up and build a wall around the usa? |
||
| 3 | |||
DFX4509B
lemmy.wtf
DFX4509B@lemmy.wtfJoined: 2025-08-08 |
The Linux exemptions in Cali and Colorado bring up something else if that gets followed on a broader scale: Can't apps and services just start blocking Linux and start specifically demanding Windows or Mac? |
||
| 15 | |||
eremophila
lemmy.zip
eremophila@lemmy.zipJoined: 2026-07-20 |
It won't. Ever. Because Linux.
torvalds is pro ai debian is ai ubuntu is ai linux is conforming/selling out |
||
| -5 | |||
artyom
piefed.social
artyom@piefed.socialJoined: 2025-06-08 |
torvalds is pro ai debian is ai ubuntu is ai linux is conforming/selling out
I don't understand what that has to do with this conversation. |
||
| 8 | |||
DFX4509B
lemmy.wtf
DFX4509B@lemmy.wtfJoined: 2025-08-08 |
If you think that some asshole won't be willing to legislate that away, think again. It might be the last refuge, but it is entirely possible to shut that down
As I pointed out, and is already actively underway on mobiles with regards to GrapheneOS and LineageOS, apps and services could always start blocking Linux. |
||
| 3 | |||
|
who
feddit.org
who@feddit.org Joined: 2025-04-02 |
i'm going to switch to devuan since systemd already pre-complied wo anyone commanding them to.
Devuan, AntiX, and MX Linux all seem worth a look for people wanting to avoid systemd. More are listed here: https://itsfoss.com/systemd-free-distros/ https://systemdfree.com/#distros (FWIW, I think systemd's age data collection is optional, at least for now. It's not clear which Linux distros will implement/adopt it by default.) |
||
| 10 | |||
|
StellarExtract
lemmy.zip
StellarExtract@lemmy.zip Joined: 2025-06-15 |
Will someone just hurry up and build a wall around the usa?
We're building it as fast as we can! |
||
| 1 | |||
|
FineCoatMummy
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2026-02-17 |
Sigh, guess it’s time to bust open a pre-code copy of ‘How to build Linux from scratch’
Short term, that'll help. Long term, it won't. Sure, you can do that. Then what? If every single site requires a secure attestation from an identity service before you can use it, you re boned. Want to shop? Bank? Social media? Check the gd weather? If the site won't serve you w/o a strong identity proof, then linux won't save you. Linux will be an island. IDK if it'll get that far. But it isn't that far fetched. Already today, I estimate 50% of site I try to use won't answer me if I totally block fingerprints and use a VPN. I'm talking mundane shit, recipes, car repair info, w/e. If I remove my privacy protections, they work fine. Nothing stops that from happening to any OS that deosn't prove a trusted ID attestation. |
||
| 16 | |||
|
FineCoatMummy
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2026-02-17 |
Legislate whatever you want, you can't stop free software.
No. But you CAN stop providing any online services to free software. G already has been moving toward requiring a "trusted OS" to get past fucking recaptcha. It isn't rolled out yet. But it could be. Linux can't stop that, b/c it can just be blocked from everything if the trusted OS attestation isn't present. |
||
| 12 | |||
|
Zephorah
discuss.online
Zephorah@discuss.online Joined: 2025-07-01 |
I’m waiting for the selfie required logins. Right now, you log into YouTube or anything else with that user base and they want a selfie and a phone number. YouTube even asks for your address. You can skip. For now. |
||
| 18 | |||
|
Creat
discuss.tchncs.de
Creat@discuss.tchncs.de Joined: 2023-06-16 |
i'm going to switch to devuan since systemd already pre-complied wo anyone commanding them to.
This is such a weird stance given the actual change that was made. No actual age verification, no external communication of any kind. All that got added is a number field. The ability to store a number labeled "age" for user accounts. That's it. There already is a field for first name and last name. You can leave them blank as well (most probably do). If any software requires a number to be there, just enter 99 or whatever. Unless this gets severely worse this is such a nothing-burger. I'm not happy about any step into that direction either, but pick your battles (or hill I guess). This certainly is a weird one. |
||
| 7 | |||
stravanasu
lemmy.ca
pglpm@lemmy.caJoined: 2023-07-05 |
Things will just get worse if we don't do something concrete, like organizing protest marches and petitions, going on strike, and similar. Quoting from an episode of Slow Horses: "heavy on hashtags, light on results". |
||
| 14 | |||
artyom
piefed.social
artyom@piefed.socialJoined: 2025-06-08 |
you can’t stop free software. No. But you CAN stop providing any online services to free software. G already has been moving toward requiring a "trusted OS" to get past fucking recaptcha. It isn't rolled out yet. But it could be. Linux can't stop that, b/c it can just be blocked from everything if the trusted OS attestation isn't present.
Good news, I already don't do that. But lots and lots of people do without any company involved at all.
Are you just not going to explain what "G" is?
It...doesnt have to? |
||
| 0 | |||
dan1101
lemmy.world
dan1101@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-12 |
Oh well back to C64 |
||
| 14 | |||
|
FineCoatMummy
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2026-02-17 |
No. But you CAN stop providing any online services to free software. Good news, I already don't do that. But lots and lots of people do without any company involved at all. G already has been Are you just not going to explain what "G" is? Linux can't stop that It...doesnt have to?
You do it for every single thing you do online. The goal of many govs and big tech is to gate everything behind an attestation requirement. Everything. That's the point. The initial move here is extremely weak attestation. You can just lie to it, or use an OSS OS. But they won't stop there. If everything gets gated behind strong attestation, then all those things become off limits to Linux. Sure, you can keep using your Linux box in your house. That cannot be stopped. But what CAN be stopped, is your ability to do anything whatsoever with it which requires the internet. Heck, even the ability to get a n/w connection can be gated. |
||
| 3 | |||
artyom
piefed.social
artyom@piefed.socialJoined: 2025-06-08 |
Good news, I already don’t do that You do it for every single thing you do online. The goal of many govs and big tech is to gate everything behind an attestation requirement. Everything. That's the point. The initial move here is extremely weak attestation. You can just lie to it, or use an OSS OS. But they won't stop there. If everything gets gated behind strong attestation, then all those thi...
No? I sure don't.
So you think everyone will just abandon free software? |
||
| 1 | |||
|
FineCoatMummy
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2026-02-17 |
The Linux exemptions in Cali and Colorado bring up something else if that gets followed on a broader scale: Can't apps and services just start blocking Linux and start specifically demanding Windows or Mac?
In principle? Yes. It could become a complete cryptographic attestation chain. I don't think we're right on the edge of that rn. But years or decades from now? Who TF knows. |
||
| 11 | |||
|
yestalgia
lemmy.world
yestalgia@lemmy.world Joined: 2026-05-14 |
Sigh, guess it’s time to bust open a pre-code copy of ‘How to build Linux from scratch’
Won't help much when the internet requires devices be verified by Google Play or equivalent to log into any accounts or do anything. I guess maybe you can paint pictures and self-host things on your DIY OS, but the stuff web like banking etc that integrates you into society won't be accessible. |
||
| 18 | |||
|
FineCoatMummy
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2026-02-17 |
No? I sure don't. If everything gets gated behind strong attestation, then all those things become off limits to Linux So you think everyone will just abandon free software?
You sure do. I don't think you quite realize the possible implications.
Everyone? No. Ofc not. But most home users? Yes. If we ever see strong attestation gating requiring a "trusted" OS, then I expect most who use linux today would abandon it. B/c everything they want to do, won't work. But it will work with Android, IOS, Windows. Big-tech trusted platforms. Data centers and so on will be able to use Linux... by abiding the attestation reqs. Ofc it won't be every single last person or every single use. There are offline uses for computers too. But normal ppl want to use online services with that laptop on their desk. They want to bank. Shop. Use social media. Etc. |
||
| 2 | |||
artyom
piefed.social
artyom@piefed.socialJoined: 2025-06-08 |
No? I sure don’t. You sure do. I don't think you quite realize the possible implications. So you think everyone will just abandon free software? Everyone? No. Ofc not. But most home users? Yes. If we ever see strong attestation gating requiring a "trusted" OS, then I expect most who use linux today would abandon it. B/c everything they want to do, won't work. But it will work with Android, IOS,...
I absolutely do not. I don't think you quite know what you're talking about.
I'm using Linux. I don't care what "most home users" do.
We are talking about Linux. Do you not know what Linux is? |
||
| -3 | |||
MouldyCat
feddit.uk
MouldyCat@feddit.ukJoined: 2024-11-25 |
I fucking guess. I am at the point where I will take my children out of school if they are forced to do face scans or give any ID in order to participate and learn. I’m almost at the point where I would rather lose my job than comply with this
don't know where you live, but here in the ol' U of K, schools have been doing that sort of thing for over 20 years! I was appalled when I first heard about it, and I think it was from a friend whose kids had to give fingerprints. "Oh yes I know - big brother, but it's so convenient" was their attitude. |
||
| 16 | |||
DFX4509B
lemmy.wtf
DFX4509B@lemmy.wtfJoined: 2025-08-08 |
Can’t apps and services just start blocking Linux and start specifically demanding Windows or Mac? In principle? Yes. It could become a complete cryptographic attestation chain. I don't think we're right on the edge of that rn. But years or decades from now? Who TF knows.
I could easily see things like Discord, Meta, Google, Reddit, and Twitter doing this if it came to that, for instance. |
||
| 10 | |||
eremophila
lemmy.zip
eremophila@lemmy.zipJoined: 2026-07-20 |
We're building it as fast as we can!
It needs a roof too. |
||
| 5 | |||
eremophila
lemmy.zip
eremophila@lemmy.zipJoined: 2026-07-20 |
I don't understand what that has to do with this conversation.
linux no longer looks like it is likely to remain an escape route from all of this bullshit. |
||
| 0 | |||
|
ferric_carcinization
lemmy.ml
ferric_carcinization@lemmy.ml Joined: 2025-03-12 |
snickers in arch linux
Giggles in Gentoo. |
||
| 5 | |||
artyom
piefed.social
artyom@piefed.socialJoined: 2025-06-08 |
linux no longer looks like it is likely to remain an escape route from all of this bullshit.
How do you figure? |
||
| 2 | |||
DFX4509B
lemmy.wtf
DFX4509B@lemmy.wtfJoined: 2025-08-08 |
you can’t stop free software. No. But you CAN stop providing any online services to free software. G already has been moving toward requiring a "trusted OS" to get past fucking recaptcha. It isn't rolled out yet. But it could be. Linux can't stop that, b/c it can just be blocked from everything if the trusted OS attestation isn't present.
And hypothetically that reCAPTCHA could also serve as an ID of sorts:
.... That could be a pretty effective way to completely lock down the web. And then moving everyone back to time-sharing on rented terminals will be the final nail in the coffin for personal computing. If Big Tech gets their way, personal computing could be killed off by thin clients or terminal apps connected to a rented cloud server. |
||
| 6 | |||
|
Euphoma
lemmy.ml
Euphoma@lemmy.ml Joined: 2023-04-27 |
Devuan, AntiX, and MX Linux all seem worth a look for people wanting to avoid systemd. More are listed here: https://itsfoss.com/systemd-free-distros/ https://systemdfree.com/#distros (FWIW, I think systemd's age data collection is optional, at least for now. It's not clear which Linux distros will implement/adopt it by default.)
no mention of guix on a systemd less distro list is crazy. not that i use guix, and im fine with systemd as a nixos user, but it feels like guix is the anti nixos. the richard stallman version of nixos with all the pros and cons that come with that |
||
| 3 | |||
|
FineCoatMummy
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2026-02-17 |
You sure do. I don’t think you quite realize the possible implications. I absolutely do not. I don't think you quite know what you're talking about. Everyone? No. Ofc not. But most home users? Yes. I'm using Linux. I don't care what "most home users" do. But it will work with Android, IOS, Windows. Big-tech trusted platforms We are talking about Linux. Do you not know what Linux is?
At this point I begin to think you are simply a troll. The point was that if those OSs work for the things normal ppl want to do, and Linux doesn't, then most ppl won't consider Linux as a viable platform, and will not use it. Under that possible future.
But you asked, and I am quoting you exactly,
My answer was to your question. It was not about YOU personally. You asked about "everyone", so I answered. You are welcome to not care what most ppl want. But the capability to deny your linux machine so much as basic network connectivity can happen. If you want to yank the network cable and use it in your house, and you are happy with that, then great. If you want to engage in a non-troll manner, that's fine. But I will not reply to troll type responses any further. |
||
| 2 | |||
artyom
piefed.social
artyom@piefed.socialJoined: 2025-06-08 |
But it will work with Android, IOS, Windows. Big-tech trusted platforms We are talking about Linux. Do you not know what Linux is? At this point I begin to think you are simply a troll. The point was that if those OSs work for the things normal ppl want to do, and Linux doesn't, then most ppl won't consider Linux as a viable platform, and will not use it. Under that possible future. I’m using L...
Funny, I was just thinking the same.
Why wouldn't it?
I did no such thing.
In order for me to not use it, it would have to be abandoned by everyone. That was my point. |
||
| -2 | |||
eremophila
lemmy.zip
eremophila@lemmy.zipJoined: 2026-07-20 |
How do you figure?
How do you not figure? |
||
| -2 | |||
artyom
piefed.social
artyom@piefed.socialJoined: 2025-06-08 |
How do you not figure?
LOL that's not how this works. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
Oh_Sheila
lemmy.zip
iloveyou@lemmy.zip Joined: 2026-09-05 |
take my children out of school if they are forced to do face scans or give any ID don't know where you live, but here in the ol' U of K, schools have been doing that sort of thing for over 20 years! I was appalled when I first heard about it, and I think it was from a friend whose kids had to give fingerprints. "Oh yes I know - big brother, but it's so convenient" was their attitude.
It is appalling, but I could see parents from 20 years ago being less concerned than now. Of course back then they weren’t aggregating user data to today’s level, at least I don’t think. What bothers me too are things like Palintir. Like, I don’t want my kid in some massive police database before they even turn 12 |
||
| 7 | |||
eremophila
lemmy.zip
eremophila@lemmy.zipJoined: 2026-07-20 |
LOL that's not how this works.
"LOL" indeed |
||
| -2 | |||
|
aim4harmony
lemmy.world
aim4harmony@lemmy.world Joined: 2026-03-27 |
I’m waiting for the selfie required logins. Right now, you log into YouTube or anything else with that user base and they want a selfie and a phone number. YouTube even asks for your address. You can skip. For now.
Oh, yeah. Like those memes with selfie logins to unlock a toilet or fridge. You log in and then the AI agent will summarize what you're watching and contact the authorities in case it flags you suspicious? How dystopian! |
||
| 6 | |||
Jul
piefed.blahaj.zone
irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zoneJoined: 2025-09-25 |
Sigh, guess it’s time to bust open a pre-code copy of ‘How to build Linux from scratch’
Linux so far is mostly exempt and it's the big corporations like Microsoft, Apple, and Google who actually want it so they can sell that info and use it for ads. For Linux, just consider it one more criteria for choosing your distribution if it comes around. If the distro adds it as a requirement for install, then move to another. Fortunately there are lots of good ones these days. |
||
| 9 | |||
| Post Reply |
Page 1 of 4
Goto page
1, 2, 3, 4
Next
Last »
Back to top |