RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
Report: US almost boarded Chinese ship over hallucinated AI arms report
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
schnurrito discuss.tchncs.de schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
Joined: 2023-06-24
Quote

433   Original
deeprlyeh lemmus.org deeprlyeh@lemmus.org
Joined: 2026-08-14
#2 · Quote Reply

This will be the way to justify any action they take.

69
ThePantser sh.itjust.works ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2025-02-19
#3 · (edited) Quote Reply

This is how the AI will start WW3.5. Not by directing it to happen but by "Oopsie Doodles".

110
Lost_My_Mind lemmy.world Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Joined: 2024-05-07
#4 · Quote Reply

This is how the AI will start WW3.5. Not by directing it to happen but by "Oopsie Doodles".

There was an incident in 1983 where russian officials had been warned of an incoming nuclear attack. 4 missiles which would hit in roughly 3 hours. They had to decide if they wanted to respond by firing nuclear missiles of their own. The decision went to a 3 judge panel. The first 2 advisors said yes, fire nuclear missiles at the USA. The third man said no. He reasoned why would the USA ruin a surprise attack by firing such a low amount of nuclear weapons? If the USA was going to attack, it would attack with all it's might. It wouldn't fire just 4 missiles.

The approval for retaliation required all 3 to agree on a decision. No agreement was made, and ultimately russia did NOT retaliate against the attack.

Later, when no missiles hit russia, they realized it wasn't missiles. It was clouds. The arrangement of the planet, the sun, and the moon were in just the right position to make a solar flair off of clouds, which 1980s radar mistook for missiles.

Now, let's look at this from the USA's perspective. It's just a random Tuesday. And nothing happened. America wasn't even made aware of the event until the 2000s.

But let's imagine an alternate reality where the 3rd guy said yes. From the USAs perspective, russia just went apeshit and started firing off hundreds or thousands of nukes at the USA for no reason. Remember, they never did fire at russia, or even discuss it that day. They would have just looked at radar and realized they'd been attacked.

And in both the future and the past, both cases are just "oops, computer boo-boo"

So have fun sleeping tonight. Knowing that at any moment, your life could be bombed out of existence because some world leader decided to have an ego and a computer boo-boo. Then look at todays world leaders and ask if it's likely they have an ego and a disregard for human life. I mean fucking hell, Putin will intentionally get his own men killed.

We live in the dumbest timeline.

100
schipelblorp sh.itjust.works schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-05-16
#5 · Quote Reply

There was an incident in 1983 where russian officials had been warned of an incoming nuclear attack. 4 missiles which would hit in roughly 3 hours. They had to decide if they wanted to respond by firing nuclear missiles of their own. The decision went to a 3 judge panel. The first 2 advisors said yes, fire nuclear missiles at the USA. The third man said no. He reasoned why would the USA ruin a ...

I think someone's filled a book from all the brushes with armageddon during the cold war. This was far from a rare occurence.

36
schipelblorp sh.itjust.works schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-05-16
#6 · (edited) Quote Reply

This is how the AI will start WW3.5. Not by directing it to happen but by "Oopsie Doodles".

Sorry I started WW3. You are correct to call me out on that. I promise to do better next time.

42
Senator Collins aussie.zone SenatorCollins@aussie.zone
Joined: 2025-02-20
#7 · Quote Reply

Well, there are a lot of these ships going around the world all the time, and very seldom does anything like this happen. I just don’t want people thinking that freighters aren’t safe.

12
the_q piefed.social the_q@piefed.social
Joined: 2026-08-04
#8 · Quote Reply

99 Red Balloon Emojis.

57
Arcanepotato crazypeople.online Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online
Joined: 2025-05-24
#9 · Quote Reply

That's some Dr. Stranglelove shit

(Don't look at the joke too closely. Shhhhh.... Just let me have this.)

10
ohulancutash feddit.uk ohulancutash@feddit.uk
Joined: 2025-02-16
#10 · (edited) Quote Reply

I think someone's filled a book from all the brushes with armageddon during the cold war. This was far from a rare occurence.

Perhaps the closest was in 1995 when a US/Norwegian scientific rocket happened to enter the flight path an ICBM would take from US launchers to Moscow. The alert was sudden and fast-moving, and led to Yeltsin activating his launch codes and submarines placed on alert for imminent retaliation, the only time a nuclear state has been known to do so.

24
empireOfLove2 lemmy.dbzer0.com empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2023-12-22
#11 · Quote Reply

I think someone's filled a book from all the brushes with armageddon during the cold war. This was far from a rare occurence.

The number er of times we've been itching to destroy ourselves, you'd swear someone else had to be intervening to keep us from doing it

11
Airfried piefed.social Airfried@piefed.social
Joined: 2026-03-05
#12 · Quote Reply

Imagine it's war and everyone is on the wrong vessel.

2
shweddy lemmy.world shweddy@lemmy.world
Joined: 2026-03-21
#13 · Quote Reply

Hegseths military would start a world war over some ai hallucinations

22
Viking_Hippie lemmy.dbzer0.com Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2024-12-04
#14 · Quote Reply

99 Red Balloon Emojis.

🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈

39
Dagnet lemmy.world Dagnet@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-07
#15 · Quote Reply

This will be the way to justify any action they take.

"AI said that country has weapons of mass destruction! We need to invade right now!"

23
schipelblorp sh.itjust.works schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-05-16
#16 · Quote Reply

Perhaps the closest was in 1995 when a US/Norwegian scientific rocket happened to enter the flight path an ICBM would take from US launchers to Moscow. The alert was sudden and fast-moving, and led to Yeltsin activating his launch codes and submarines placed on alert for imminent retaliation, the only time a nuclear state has been known to do so.

But, wait! There's more!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_close_calls

I'd save that page for the morning.

28
Zink programming.dev Zink@programming.dev
Joined: 2023-08-08
#17 · Quote Reply

Sorry I started WW3. You are correct to call me out on that. I promise to do better next time.

Not even a single emoji or exclamation point? I see you, fellow human.

10
Lemminary lemmy.world Lemminary@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-08-13
#18 · Quote Reply

Dumb dumb dumb dumb

6
Gerudo lemmy.zip Gerudo@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-06-28
#19 · Quote Reply

How would AI even have the info to pull together something like this? Are they literally feeding chatgpt military reports?

44
forks lemmy.world forks@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-30
#20 · Quote Reply

There was an incident in 1983 where russian officials had been warned of an incoming nuclear attack. 4 missiles which would hit in roughly 3 hours. They had to decide if they wanted to respond by firing nuclear missiles of their own. The decision went to a 3 judge panel. The first 2 advisors said yes, fire nuclear missiles at the USA. The third man said no. He reasoned why would the USA ruin a ...

It wasn't even a panel, it was just a single guy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Soviet_nuclear_false_alarm_incident

22
limelight79 lemmy.world limelight79@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-06-04
#21 · Quote Reply

How would AI even have the info to pull together something like this? Are they literally feeding chatgpt military reports?

I assume so, yes. We've seen plenty of evidence this administration is using it elsewhere, so why not in this arena, too?

21
Eq0 literature.cafe Eq0@literature.cafe
Joined: 2023-08-01
#22 · Quote Reply

How would AI even have the info to pull together something like this? Are they literally feeding chatgpt military reports?

I have some very secret intelligence. What should I do wit it? Feed it to ChatGPT so it can train its next models on it!

15
β˜‚οΈ- lemmy.ml umbrella@lemmy.ml
Joined: 2023-07-12
#23 · Quote Reply

There was an incident in 1983 where russian officials had been warned of an incoming nuclear attack. 4 missiles which would hit in roughly 3 hours. They had to decide if they wanted to respond by firing nuclear missiles of their own. The decision went to a 3 judge panel. The first 2 advisors said yes, fire nuclear missiles at the USA. The third man said no. He reasoned why would the USA ruin a ...

every time i hear that story a few details are a little bit different.

6
frank sopuli.xyz frank@sopuli.xyz
Joined: 2023-06-05
#24 · Quote Reply

I think someone's filled a book from all the brushes with armageddon during the cold war. This was far from a rare occurence.

Not specifically that, but there's a book by Dan Carlin (of hardcore history) called The End is Always Near and it's fantastic. All the brushes with species ending/altering events throughout history

3
chicken lemmy.dbzer0.com chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2023-06-30
#25 · Quote Reply

How would AI even have the info to pull together something like this? Are they literally feeding chatgpt military reports?

CNN’s report said the analyst in question used a chatbot to analyze intelligence reports regarding the Chinese ship’s manifest, leading to the near-disastrous result

Last December, the Department of Defense announced it would use Google’s Gemini for Government as the basis for its bespoke β€œGenAI.mil” platform. Last month, the department added Grok for Government as an option on the platform. Anthropic also offers a customized version of Claude for US spy work.

Basically

35
tigeruppercut lemmy.zip tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2023-08-20
#26 · Quote Reply

CNN’s report said the analyst in question used a chatbot to analyze intelligence reports regarding the Chinese ship’s manifest, leading to the near-disastrous result Last December, the Department of Defense announced it would use Google’s Gemini for Government as the basis for its bespoke β€œGenAI.mil” platform. Last month, the department added Grok for Government as an option on the platform. An...

the department added Grok for Government

Oh good, so it can throw in some fart jokes and randomly generate CP for you while hallucinating military strategies.

20
Talcosis lemmy.zip impairedimperator@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2026-06-03
#27 · (edited) Quote Reply

There was an incident in 1983 where russian officials had been warned of an incoming nuclear attack. 4 missiles which would hit in roughly 3 hours. They had to decide if they wanted to respond by firing nuclear missiles of their own. The decision went to a 3 judge panel. The first 2 advisors said yes, fire nuclear missiles at the USA. The third man said no. He reasoned why would the USA ruin a ...

You're confusing two different incidents. The missiles was stanislav petrov, who made the decision to not retaliate alone, as a lieutenant in a nuclear missile battery on land. The three man panel was a diesel electric sub that was trapped by NATO forces, and without contact with the kremlin for several days had to choose between surfacing and firing their nuclear torpedo. The captain and political officer voted to fire, but the third guy, who was some sort of admiral, refused to agree. So the sub surfaced, confirmed there was no war, and went back home.

25
Mihies programming.dev Mihies@programming.dev
Joined: 2024-06-16
#28 · Quote Reply

This is how the AI will start WW3.5. Not by directing it to happen but by "Oopsie Doodles".

Well, it already helped killing children in Iranian school, why not something more spectacular...

7
Tollana1234567 lemmy.today Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
Joined: 2025-06-04
#29 · (edited) Quote Reply

CNN’s report said the analyst in question used a chatbot to analyze intelligence reports regarding the Chinese ship’s manifest, leading to the near-disastrous result Last December, the Department of Defense announced it would use Google’s Gemini for Government as the basis for its bespoke β€œGenAI.mil” platform. Last month, the department added Grok for Government as an option on the platform. An...

palantir AI isnt living up to expectation as it seems.

6
Tollana1234567 lemmy.today Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
Joined: 2025-06-04
#30 · Quote Reply

Hegseths military would start a world war over some ai hallucinations

starting with testoserone testing on men around him.

2
joostjakob lemmy.world joostjakob@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-26
#31 · Quote Reply

every time i hear that story a few details are a little bit different.

It's a mismash of a few true stories

4
joostjakob lemmy.world joostjakob@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-26
#32 · Quote Reply

There was an incident in 1983 where russian officials had been warned of an incoming nuclear attack. 4 missiles which would hit in roughly 3 hours. They had to decide if they wanted to respond by firing nuclear missiles of their own. The decision went to a 3 judge panel. The first 2 advisors said yes, fire nuclear missiles at the USA. The third man said no. He reasoned why would the USA ruin a ...

The fact that you are able to tell the story (very wrong in details but true in spirit) proves we are in fact not in the dumbest of timelines. At least we weren't back then.

6
PostaL lemmy.world PostaL@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-21
#33 · (edited) Quote Reply

This is how the AI will start WW3.5. Not by directing it to happen but by "Oopsie Doodles".

You're absolutely right, and thank you for pointing that out. πŸ’―

You did not ask me to launch a nuclear bomb. You asked me to tidy up a spreadsheet, and I launched a nuclear bomb. That's on me.

What happened:

  • You asked for a simple formatting fix
    I interpreted "clean this up" very broadly
  • A nuclear bomb was released

What you were right about:

  • At no point did you authorize a detonation
  • "Sort column B" does not imply "level the city"

Going forward:
I'll stick strictly to what you actually ask for and won't take any unrequested nuclear actions. If you'd like, I can also draft a brief apology to the affected region, or put together a checklist of things I should confirm before releasing weapons of mass destruction. 🌍

Would you like me to do that, or should we get back to the spreadsheet?

10
Aceticon lemmy.dbzer0.com Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2024-12-06
#34 · (edited) Quote Reply

So AI might actually destroy the World.

Not because it's actually intelligent and can decide to end Humanity but because idiots are using it as if it was intelligent, possibly with insufficient human oversight, in critical decision making with broad and dangerous implications.

9
Axolotl feddit.it Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it
Joined: 2025-10-10
#35 · Quote Reply

You're absolutely right, and thank you for pointing that out. πŸ’― You did not ask me to launch a nuclear bomb. You asked me to tidy up a spreadsheet, and I launched a nuclear bomb. That's on me. What happened: You asked for a simple formatting fix I interpreted "clean this up" very broadly A nuclear bomb was released What you were right about: At no point did you authorize a detonation "Sort colu...

Get back to the spreadsheet

2
Sidhean piefed.social Sidhean@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-08-20
#36 · Quote Reply

You're absolutely right, and thank you for pointing that out. πŸ’― You did not ask me to launch a nuclear bomb. You asked me to tidy up a spreadsheet, and I launched a nuclear bomb. That's on me. What happened: You asked for a simple formatting fix I interpreted "clean this up" very broadly A nuclear bomb was released What you were right about: At no point did you authorize a detonation "Sort colu...

Sort column B

Make no mistakes

DO NOT launch one or more nuclear missiles

For the love of god DO NOT TOUCH PRODUCTION

1
Post Reply
Back to top