| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » No Stupid Questions |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
ILikeBoobies
lemmy.ca
ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca Joined: 2023-08-14 |
Obviously not open source and AI companies don't care about copyright but in theory does it cover it? |
||
| 2 Original | |||
|
BougieBirdie
piefed.blahaj.zone
Bougie_Birdie@piefed.blahaj.zone Joined: 2025-07-19 |
"No Derivatives" sounds like it might offer protection, but that's technically if they take your work and transform it. If you're referring to Attribution being a requirement and then AI is trained on your image, attribution is practically impossible regardless of the legality (that doesn't make it right) There might be some argument about Fair Use or Fair Dealing, but IANAL Although I'll reiterate your own point because it's the most essential: AI companies don't care |
||
| 4 | |||
|
VibeSurgeon
piefed.social
VibeSurgeon@piefed.social Joined: 2026-01-15 |
It would not |
||
| 4 | |||
|
deeprlyeh
lemmus.org
deeprlyeh@lemmus.org Joined: 2026-08-14 |
"No Derivatives" sounds like it might offer protection, but that's technically if they take your work and transform it. If you're referring to Attribution being a requirement and then AI is trained on your image, attribution is practically impossible regardless of the legality (that doesn't make it right) There might be some argument about Fair Use or Fair Dealing, but IANAL Although I'll reite...
Unless you distill their model. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
one_old_coder
piefed.social
one_old_coder@piefed.social Joined: 2026-02-08 |
Feel free to sue Microsoft, Google, Facebook, and that idiot Sam Altman, and tell us how much money you got. (the answer is no obviously) |
||
| -1 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |