| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » Mechanical Engineering |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
BenoitCollin
lemmy.world
BenoitCollin@lemmy.world Joined: 2026-08-11 |
Hello everyone, As an inventor based in Montreal, I am sharing today with the community the workshop blueprints and kinematic architecture of the Circular Mass Transfer System (CMTS). This project, released under an open-source framework, is designed to open a technical and practical debate regarding eccentric mass management and torque asymmetry. Before diving into the technical specifications, I would like to establish an essential clarification for the sanity of our future exchanges: === STOP CONFOUNDING THERMODYNAMICS AND KINEMATICS === To everyone preparing to mechanically comment "this goes against the laws of thermodynamics": you are making yourselves truly ridiculous. Thermodynamics studies heat conversions and general energy. Here, we are strictly within the realm of KINEMATICS and SOLID-BODY STATICS. The motion of all known perpetual wheels does not stop because of a thermal dogma; it stops in EVERY KNOWN SYSTEM SOLELY because their symmetrical geometry generates a net torque of exactly ZERO (0 Nm) at the central hub. Claiming "it is impossible because of thermodynamics" without analyzing the geometric offset is just like claiming that a lever or a gearbox is impossible because it multiplies mechanical force. An asymmetrical lever arm is not a thermal violation; it is raw geometry. If you want to criticize, put down your pens, grab your rulers, TEST and VERIFY the eccentric path of the DM (Directed Mass / Diriger Masse). If you are unable to calculate a mechanical torque at 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock, do not hide behind pedantic academic jargon to avoid thinking. === THE CMTS CHALLENGE: WORKSHOP GEOMETRY === The Circular Mass Transfer System (CMTS) addresses the zero-torque problem not with abstract formulas, but through pure machine-shop geometry. By utilizing a simplified 2-axis, 4-mass structure governed by a strict orbital path constraint I call "DM" (Directed Mass), the geometry breaks the classic dead-center impasse commonly encountered at 6 and 12 o'clock: In this technical document, I explain precisely why all known historical perpetual wheels fail to function. A major portion of my technical dossier is dedicated to this critical analysis in order to establish undeniable workshop facts. Examine the blueprints, test and verify for yourselves the kinematics of this 2.1 cm pivoting arm offset, and see with your own eyes how geometry manages mechanical torque at the hub. === TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS === • Initial Action Radius: 7.0 cm (scalable up to 12.0 cm). === LEGAL NOTICE & LICENSING === 🔔 Note to the reader: Direct download links for the complete technical dossier (original PDF workshop blueprints) are hosted securely across multiple platforms below. === OFFICIAL DOWNLOAD LINKS & REPOSITORIES === • 🌍 Digital Library (Internet Archive):
• 🏔️ Alternative Open-Source Forge (Codeberg) :
• 📖 Appropriate Technology Wiki (Appropedia):
|
||
| 3 Original | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |