RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
Bill Gates says unchecked AI could ‘cause a billion deaths’ in call for regulation [in fearmarketing stunt]
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
supersquirrel lemmy.ca supersquirrel@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2026-08-07
(edited) Quote

I don't understand why Bill Gates still feels the need to do marketing work, he is already rich he doesn't need to do commercials and blatantingly shill for a product for money like this.

Also the ides that anyone should listen to Bill Gates about needing or not needing government regulation, nationalization or trustbusting is actually insane.

79   Original
yesman lemmy.world yesman@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-06
#2 · Quote Reply

Is it just me or does this "AI Doomsday" talk seem like coordinated messaging?

Chatbots that are smart enough to destroy humanity would be really impressive, right? "Powerful enough to change the world" and "powerful enough to destroy the world" are similar claims and maybe they're switching to the second one because nobody is buying the first anymore.

50
gerikson awful.systems gerikson@awful.systems
Joined: 2023-07-01
#3 · (edited) Quote Reply

Is it just me or does this "AI Doomsday" talk seem like coordinated messaging? Chatbots that are smart enough to destroy humanity would be really impressive, right? "Powerful enough to change the world" and "powerful enough to destroy the world" are similar claims and maybe they're switching to the second one because nobody is buying the first anymore.

it's not just you

occam's razor says that in the face of faltering demand and sky-high expenditures, government cheese and regulation is an expected pivot

try to suggest that and the rats get very mad tho

23
Rentlar lemmy.ca Rentlar@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-03-14
#4 · Quote Reply

Billionaires could cause a total population extinction, those deserve regulation first, before AI.

22
gerikson awful.systems gerikson@awful.systems
Joined: 2023-07-01
#5 · Quote Reply

Billionaires could cause a total population extinction, those deserve regulation first, before AI.

how about we extinct all billionaires instead

12
QueenFern lemmy.zip QueenFern@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-06-19
#6 · Quote Reply

This pedophile just won't go away

15
supersquirrel lemmy.ca supersquirrel@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2026-08-07
#7 · Quote Reply

Billionaires could cause a total population extinction, those deserve regulation first, before AI.

Remember when Bill Gates lent his piece of shit opinion in on not letting India produce covid vaccines without patent approval and with their own production lines?

That murdered a whole lot of people all by itself.

19
UpAndAtThem lemmy.world UpAndAtThem@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-05-01
#8 · Quote Reply

They desperately need us to believe that it's skynet, so we dont realize it's just evil C3PO

9
11111one11111 lemmy.world 11111one11111@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-11-19
#9 · (edited) Quote Reply

Is it just me or does this "AI Doomsday" talk seem like coordinated messaging? Chatbots that are smart enough to destroy humanity would be really impressive, right? "Powerful enough to change the world" and "powerful enough to destroy the world" are similar claims and maybe they're switching to the second one because nobody is buying the first anymore.

I cant tell if you are being serious or not but in case you are, and truly dont remember this gem from almost 12 years ago.

Also, an actual article from Yahoo! on the letter that definitely doesnt sound like it was written by fangirl, lol

6
k0e3 lemmy.ca k0e3@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2025-03-03
#10 · Quote Reply

Oh gosh this is so powerful, I better buy it before the other guys do! - some gullible CEO of a company

11
ladicius lemmy.world ladicius@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-16
#11 · Quote Reply

Is it just me or does this "AI Doomsday" talk seem like coordinated messaging? Chatbots that are smart enough to destroy humanity would be really impressive, right? "Powerful enough to change the world" and "powerful enough to destroy the world" are similar claims and maybe they're switching to the second one because nobody is buying the first anymore.

They want to shift responsibilities to their products and their users.

12
ruuster13 lemmy.zip ruuster13@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-07-09
Banned
#12 · Quote Reply

The doomerism gets politicians talking about it instead of the problem right in front of them: these products are actively hacking into businesses across the world.

-1
froztbyte awful.systems froztbyte@awful.systems
Joined: 2023-07-02
#13 · Quote Reply

I don't understand why Bill Gates still feels the need to do marketing work

because he’s actively doing works to change the world in specific (negative) ways. look into the history of gates-tied funding in nutrition programs, he’s got a bad-shit-for-humanity track record spanning well past a decade. has “just” had a better PR team than the clowns of vogue

10
supersquirrel lemmy.ca supersquirrel@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2026-08-07
#14 · Quote Reply

The doomerism gets politicians talking about it instead of the problem right in front of them: these products are actively hacking into businesses across the world.

the problem right in front of them:

Billionaires

5
GardenGeek europe.pub GardenGeek@europe.pub
Joined: 2026-01-10
#15 · Quote Reply

The doomerism gets politicians talking about it instead of the problem right in front of them: these products are actively hacking into businesses across the world.

these products are actively hacking into businesses across the world.

No, they are not. They are used by people to do this.
These systems aren't able to act unprompted hence this whole ,, they're breaking free" talk is nothing more but the companies trying to deflate the bubble they created before it pops with their money in it.

12
ruuster13 lemmy.zip ruuster13@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-07-09
Banned
#16 · Quote Reply

these products are actively hacking into businesses across the world. No, they are not. They are used by people to do this. These systems aren't able to act unprompted hence this whole ,, they're breaking free" talk is nothing more but the companies trying to deflate the bubble they created before it pops with their money in it.

We're making the same argument. The people building these tools must be held accountable.

0
P1nkman lemmy.world P1nkman@lemmy.world
Joined: 2024-04-28
#17 · Quote Reply

They quoted him wrong. He said "... will cause billionaires death...". Why else is he and the other billionaires suddenly shit scared of LLM's?

5
Anisette [any/all] awful.systems anise@awful.systems
Joined: 2026-05-15
#18 · Quote Reply

We're making the same argument. The people building these tools must be held accountable.

you aren't, you're making a similar arguments to the doomers. The problem they have isn't that their chatbots are "hacking people" or whatever, it's that there isn't a lot of room to either escalate or substantiate their claims left and not a lot of time to find a way to be profitable, somehow

3
JeeBaiChow lemmy.world JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-09-04
#19 · Quote Reply

They quoted him wrong. He said "... will cause billionaires death...". Why else is he and the other billionaires suddenly shit scared of LLM's?

The 'cutting edge ai anaesthetic system' could get the dosage wrong.

crosses fingers

2
JeeBaiChow lemmy.world JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-09-04
#20 · (edited) Quote Reply

the problem right in front of them: Billionaires

Cute of you to think they frequent the same joints as the rest of us commoners.

1
self awful.systems self@awful.systems
Joined: 2023-06-25
#21 · Quote Reply

We're making the same argument. The people building these tools must be held accountable.

we don’t actually need anyone here to rebroadcast anthropic and openai’s marketing claims, thanks

5
fubarx lemmy.world fubarx@lemmy.world
Joined: 2024-06-07
#22 · Quote Reply

The only way 'AI' can kill people is if it's connected to a killing machine, or more likely, it drives people who run killing machines. In all cases, it involves negligient, evil, or incompetent human beings.

All of this is avoidable.

9
Delphia lemmy.world Delphia@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-09
#23 · Quote Reply

Is it just me or does this "AI Doomsday" talk seem like coordinated messaging? Chatbots that are smart enough to destroy humanity would be really impressive, right? "Powerful enough to change the world" and "powerful enough to destroy the world" are similar claims and maybe they're switching to the second one because nobody is buying the first anymore.

The big organisations want it regulated to the point where upstarts get strangled by oversight and regulations and only the biggest established players will have the manpower and money to ensure compliance.

6
Tollana1234567 lemmy.today Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
Joined: 2025-06-04
#24 · Quote Reply

This pedophile just won't go away

after the news of him trying to ask epstein for advice how to give abx to his wife in secret after sleeping with russian prostitutes with STD who passed on to him and then to his wife. hes been solely focused on deflecting from this news, and not surprisingly dropped his pretense of "charitable" nature.

5
JeeBaiChow lemmy.world JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-09-04
#25 · Quote Reply

Is it just me or does this "AI Doomsday" talk seem like coordinated messaging? Chatbots that are smart enough to destroy humanity would be really impressive, right? "Powerful enough to change the world" and "powerful enough to destroy the world" are similar claims and maybe they're switching to the second one because nobody is buying the first anymore.

Gotta get that investment cash somehow, why not skynet?

3
Soyweiser awful.systems Soyweiser@awful.systems
Joined: 2023-09-07
#26 · Quote Reply

it's not just you occam's razor says that in the face of faltering demand and sky-high expenditures, government cheese and regulation is an expected pivot try to suggest that and the rats get very mad tho

Hey it worked for cryptocurrencies.

2
ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝 sopuli.xyz HK65@sopuli.xyz
Joined: 2024-07-14
#27 · Quote Reply

Is it just me or does this "AI Doomsday" talk seem like coordinated messaging? Chatbots that are smart enough to destroy humanity would be really impressive, right? "Powerful enough to change the world" and "powerful enough to destroy the world" are similar claims and maybe they're switching to the second one because nobody is buying the first anymore.

OpenAI and Anthropic wants to stop training new models because they have run out of other people's money.

They want regulators to ban their competition because without spending untold money to stay like 4 months ahead of competitors, they are not viable businesses.

4
SaveTheTuaHawk lemmy.ca SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2025-03-07
Banned
#28 · Quote Reply

Why are we giving air to anyone who attended Epstein Island?

3
theodoraward awful.systems theodoraward@awful.systems
Joined: 2026-07-29
#29 · Quote Reply

it's so fucking funny that bill gates had basically successfully laundered his reputation from "the demonic sociopath from the antitrust hearings" to "the One Good Billionaire," but it's been entirely undone again by the epstein stuff. i bet he does believe the doomer shit because they all do because it's also like, yeah bill, this'll definitely be the train that pulls you back into public good graces. definitely

6
Post Reply
Back to top