RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
Did the Forestry Industry Just Get to Write Its Own Emissions Rules?
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
silence7 slrpnk.net silence7@slrpnk.net
Joined: 2023-06-11
Quote

Accusations of industry capture, allegedly secret working groups, and the resignations of two researchers—a scandal is rocking the world of carbon emissions accounting.

[Archived copiesof the article

32   Original
livligkinkajou slrpnk.net livligkinkajou@slrpnk.net
Joined: 2026-01-27
#2 · Quote Reply

Managed land proxy “plus" sounds like a nightmare, it would basically reward deforestation from what I could understand, cmiiw

Shortly after Cullenward and Searchinger resigned this summer, the GHG Protocol announced that it would be aligning its carbon emissions accounting with [ISO] [...] ISO has its own proprietary forest carbon accounting standard that SourceMaterial and Bloomberg report closely mirrors the managed land proxy approach. In combining their methods, the jointly formed committees that help make those decisions could be anonymous, per ISO policy and against GHGP Protocol, which stipulates that membership lists be made publicly available.

I wonder why

Cullenward has reasoned that this could offer cover for corporate representatives to dominate talks more openly than they have been, given the GHG Protocol’s governance rules.

1
Post Reply
Back to top