| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » United States | News & Politics |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
cm0002
toast.ooo
cm0002@toast.ooo Joined: 2025-10-22 |
|
||
| 75 Original | |||
DickHertz
lemmy.world
DickHertz@lemmy.worldJoined: 2026-10-05 |
I mean it’s become obvious that capitalism isn’t benefiting anyone but the rich at this point so it’s natural for people to look for something else. 🤷 |
||
| 2 | |||
orioler25
lemmy.world
orioler25@lemmy.worldJoined: 2025-10-19 |
Kind of a misleading headline and article. Literally, the survey they're citing just asked randos "What do you think of [political ideology/topic]?" and reported the rates of responses. It doesn't account for how "socialism" is a nebulous term colloquially, or that welfare liberals have readily appropriated many socialist talking points and rhetoric. This is more accurately read as, "Americans don't like big business, take 'socialism' as an alternative; oh also it went down among the purportedly more 'leftist' Dem voters."
|
||
| 0 | |||
_haha_oh_wow_
sh.itjust.works
_haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.worksJoined: 2023-06-12 |
Step 1: Make healthcare unaffordable so companies can make lots of extra money. Step 2: Call people who want to provide basic things like adequate healthcare socialists or communists. Step 3: ????? Step 4: |
||
| 14 | |||
TheTechnician27
lemmy.world
TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldJoined: 2024-07-25 |
Kind of a misleading headline and article. Literally, the survey they're citing just asked randos "What do you think of [political ideology/topic]?" and reported the rates of responses. It doesn't account for how "socialism" is a nebulous term colloquially, or that welfare liberals have readily appropriated many socialist talking points and rhetoric. This is more accurately read as, "Americans ...
"This article is so misleading! All they did was survey people to ask if they approve of the thing and then directly report how many of them approve of the thing. How dare they
Ah, yes, and your brilliant insight explains why, uh:
Those two trend lines intersected, which has to mean they're being substituted. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
zabadoh
ani.social
zabadoh@ani.social Joined: 2023-11-19 |
Step 1: Make healthcare unaffordable so companies can make lots of extra money. Step 2: Call people who want to provide basic things like adequate healthcare socialists or communists. Step 3: ????? Step 4: Lose the election Profit!!!
The capitalists can't lose the election since both parties are bought and paid for. We need strong 3rd parties. And many more representatives so that they can be more representative of the population. |
||
| 5 | |||
|
boatswain
infosec.pub
boatswain@infosec.pub Joined: 2023-06-18 |
The poll results are pretty interesting:
|
||
| 3 | |||
|
DjangoFett
lemmy.zip
DjangoFett@lemmy.zip Joined: 2026-07-05 |
The capitalists can't lose the election since both parties are bought and paid for. We need strong 3rd parties. And many more representatives so that they can be more representative of the population.
Third parties are immediately quashed by the machine. Like them or not, DSA candidates have the right of it; infiltrate the parties and effect changes from within. You cannot simply erase one of the two parties without a vast majority responding to the blatant power grab violently. Unless you want a full blow violent revolution. In which case do you boo boo, but I would much rather a more peaceful solution for my children to witness. |
||
| 6 | |||
_haha_oh_wow_
sh.itjust.works
_haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.worksJoined: 2023-06-12 |
The capitalists can't lose the election since both parties are bought and paid for. We need strong 3rd parties. And many more representatives so that they can be more representative of the population.
Let's bring back the Bull Moose party! |
||
| 1 | |||
wyldrstallyns
lemmy.dbzer0.com
wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.comJoined: 2026-05-16 |
Can't hit zero if you're already nonexistent. 🤌🏼 |
||
| 1 | |||
wyldrstallyns
lemmy.dbzer0.com
wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.comJoined: 2026-05-16 |
The capitalists can't lose the election since both parties are bought and paid for. We need strong 3rd parties. And many more representatives so that they can be more representative of the population.
If by "third-party", you assume the dismantling of the initial two, maybe. |
||
| 1 | |||
wyldrstallyns
lemmy.dbzer0.com
wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.comJoined: 2026-05-16 |
Third parties are immediately quashed by the machine. Like them or not, DSA candidates have the right of it; infiltrate the parties and effect changes from within. You cannot simply erase one of the two parties without a vast majority responding to the blatant power grab violently. Unless you want a full blow violent revolution. In which case do you boo boo, but I would much rather a more peace...
I, for one, would return to protesting if it were a full blow revolution. 🤷🏼♂️ |
||
| 1 | |||
|
AngryCommieKender
lemmy.world
AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-08-02 |
The capitalists can't lose the election since both parties are bought and paid for. We need strong 3rd parties. And many more representatives so that they can be more representative of the population.
We need to get rid of FPTP. You mathematically can't have third parties in a FPTP system, but that wasn't proven until over 70 years after The Union was formed. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
AngryCommieKender
lemmy.world
AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-08-02 |
I, for one, would return to protesting if it were a full blow revolution. 🤷🏼♂️
You for one, would continue doing nothing if a revolution happened. You don't show on the front lines today, so you will continue to do effectively nothing to support the front lines in the future. I show up to the ICE OUT protests daily, knowing my face has been recorded, and my identity is in a Palantir database. If they want to come get me, they better be prepared to lose a minimum of 3 agents and a maximum of 16 before I stop using the training they, the military and boy scouts, gave me against them |
||
| 1 | |||
|
CrimeIsLegalNow
ani.social
CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social Joined: 2026-09-09 |
It's a great first step, now to to teach the libs that socialism isn't the government doing stuff. |
||
| 3 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |