| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » Fuck AI |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
comrade
piefed.social
ejs@piefed.socialJoined: 2026-01-30 |
Democracy Now interviews the prominent AI researcher and leading critic of the AI industry, Timnit Gebru, who was recently awarded a 2026 Right Livelihood Award for her work investigating the harms and hype behind the global buildup of artificial intelligence. “Instead of discussing faulty, unreliable systems,” Gebru says tech leaders like SpaceXAI’s Elon Musk, OpenAI’s Sam Altman and Anthropic’s Dario Amodei are “marketing their systems as all-knowing, superpowerful, superintelligent,” and lobbying for “self-policing and self-regulation” to avoid being held “liable through existing laws.” Gebru expresses skepticism over increasingly widespread claims that AI algorithms pose an existential risk to humanity, warning that such claims are overblown and that “what is actually happening is regulatory capture.” |
||
| 56 Original | |||
Arghblarg
lemmy.ca
Arghblarg@lemmy.caJoined: 2023-06-10 |
The CxOs of all "AI" companies should be held personally liable for what their LLMs and harnesses do. Just like car manufacturers should be held liable if brakes fail on a line of cars. There is no 'rogue' "AI", only rogue "AI" companies and executives and guardrail programmers. |
||
| 13 | |||
Malica
lemmy.zip
Malica@lemmy.zipJoined: 2026-08-27 |
These are not the actions of honest men |
||
| 1 | |||
|
ElDuderino
lemmus.org
ElDuderino@lemmus.org Joined: 2026-08-13 |
I couldnt listen to the whole interview. The beginning seems to feed into the delusion that these models act on their own. Which I cannot abide. These are still applications, and they do what their owners intend them to do. They do not 'go rogue' |
||
| 2 | |||
|
ElDuderino
lemmus.org
ElDuderino@lemmus.org Joined: 2026-08-13 |
The CxOs of all "AI" companies should be held personally liable for what their LLMs and harnesses do. Just like car manufacturers should be held liable if brakes fail on a line of cars. There is no 'rogue' "AI", only rogue "AI" companies and executives and guardrail programmers.
Hear hear! We can't let ignorance absolve the wrongs of the people steering these ships. |
||
| 2 | |||
comrade
piefed.social
ejs@piefed.socialJoined: 2026-01-30 |
I couldnt listen to the whole interview. The beginning seems to feed into the delusion that these models act on their own. Which I cannot abide. These are still applications, and they do what their owners intend them to do. They do not 'go rogue'
Maybe you’re misunderstanding—you’re saying exactly what the interviewee says:
|
||
| 2 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |