RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
Make it so.
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
The Picard Maneuver lemmy.world The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-22
Quote

358   Original
justdaveisfine piefed.social justdaveisfine@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-06-23
#2 · Quote Reply

FTL moment.

"I don't need oxygen, just enough power for the lasers... Oh."

18
Multiplexer discuss.tchncs.de Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
Joined: 2025-08-25
#3 · (edited) Quote Reply

I never understood the "divert power from life support" trope of Star Trek.

I mean, how much power could that possibly be?

We essentially already sustained prolonged life support by using a tiny batch of primitive batteries and fuels cells during multi-day trips to reach the moon in the sixties.

With efficient 23th century tech, life support should be almost self-sustaining using ambient waste heat or something.

Always has been one of the major suspension-of-disbelief efforts for me...

57
๐Ÿ‡ฐ ๐ŸŒ€ ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ‡ณ ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ‡ฐ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ pawb.social Kolanaki@pawb.social
Joined: 2024-10-06
#4 · (edited) Quote Reply

I never understood the "divert power from life support" trope of Star Trek. I mean, how much power could that possibly be? We essentially already sustained prolonged life support by using a tiny batch of primitive batteries and fuels cells during multi-day trips to reach the moon in the sixties. With efficient 23th century tech, life support should be almost self-sustaining using ambient waste ...

Air-conditioning is pretty power intensive and The Enterprise is a big ass ship. That's not even counting the other things life support does (like heat and CO2 scrubbing), just the air circulation.

But even on the show, there's been a couple times where they mention the power from life support is nearly negligible. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

49
quediuspayu lemmy.dbzer0.com quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2025-02-06
#5 · (edited) Quote Reply

That bridge is huge it would take hours or days for them to suffocate, also, how power hungry is that life support system that often is enough to make a difference? Do they use replicators instead of fans?

15
Multiplexer discuss.tchncs.de Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
Joined: 2025-08-25
#6 · Quote Reply

Air-conditioning is pretty power intensive and The Enterprise is a big ass ship. That's not even counting the other things life support does (like heat and CO2 scrubbing), just the air circulation. But even on the show, there's been a couple times where they mention the power from life support is nearly negligible. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

Air-conditioning is pretty power intensive

Even that should still be minuscle compared to getting rid of the waste heat from a huge antimatter reactor.
Feels like trying to get your Ferrari faster by switching of the cockpit instrument illumination. Not even worth giving the command.

6
DaddleDew lemmy.world DaddleDew@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-08
#7 · Quote Reply

Data just looking back, unaffected.

11
13igtyme startrek.website 13igtyme@startrek.website
Joined: 2026-09-21
#8 · Quote Reply

I never understood the "divert power from life support" trope of Star Trek. I mean, how much power could that possibly be? We essentially already sustained prolonged life support by using a tiny batch of primitive batteries and fuels cells during multi-day trips to reach the moon in the sixties. With efficient 23th century tech, life support should be almost self-sustaining using ambient waste ...

It's just written in to add weight to a tense moment.

9
Benign fedia.io Benign@fedia.io
Joined: 2024-06-07
#9 · Quote Reply

FTL moment. "I don't need oxygen, just enough power for the lasers... Oh."

Also a very CEO thing to say.

6
nightwatch_admin lemmy.world nightwatch_admin@lemmy.world
Joined: 2026-03-17
#10 · Quote Reply

Air-conditioning is pretty power intensive and The Enterprise is a big ass ship. That's not even counting the other things life support does (like heat and CO2 scrubbing), just the air circulation. But even on the show, there's been a couple times where they mention the power from life support is nearly negligible. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

This guy treks

5
nightwatch_admin lemmy.world nightwatch_admin@lemmy.world
Joined: 2026-03-17
#11 · Quote Reply

Air-conditioning is pretty power intensive and The Enterprise is a big ass ship. That's not even counting the other things life support does (like heat and CO2 scrubbing), just the air circulation. But even on the show, there's been a couple times where they mention the power from life support is nearly negligible. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

They use AI everywhere. Thatโ€™s power hungry stuff (and people will deny it is).

3
schipelblorp sh.itjust.works schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-05-16
#12 · Quote Reply

Air-conditioning is pretty power intensive Even that should still be minuscle compared to getting rid of the waste heat from a huge antimatter reactor. Feels like trying to get your Ferrari faster by switching of the cockpit instrument illumination. Not even worth giving the command.

How does transferring heat out of a ship work? On the one hand, it's really cold in space, but on the other, there's no substrate to absorb and transfer the heat.

5
WagnasT piefed.world WagnasT@piefed.world
Joined: 2025-07-10
#13 · Quote Reply

That bridge is huge it would take hours or days for them to suffocate, also, how power hungry is that life support system that often is enough to make a difference? Do they use replicators instead of fans?

I assume since they are on a ship for several years that life support also handles bio waste, CO2 scrubbing, and anything else to keep the ship habitable. It would probably still be negligible but maybe rearranging molecules takes a fuckload of power, idk.

12
Multiplexer discuss.tchncs.de Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
Joined: 2025-08-25
#14 · Quote Reply

It's just written in to add weight to a tense moment.

Itโ€™s just written in to add weight to a tense moment.

I know the reason why they did it.

Still annoys me slightly. Actually even more than the techno-babble that is mentioned by most as a somewhat annoying thing written in.

But I don't watch Star Trek for its scientific accuracy, so it's ok.

As already said: It is still manageable by suspension of disbelief to enjoy the strong aspects of the show, which mostly are not the specifics of the science-based things being shown (in contrast to the underlying ideas - those are often great!)

8
marcos lemmy.world marcos@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-16
#15 · Quote Reply

Air-conditioning is pretty power intensive and The Enterprise is a big ass ship. That's not even counting the other things life support does (like heat and CO2 scrubbing), just the air circulation. But even on the show, there's been a couple times where they mention the power from life support is nearly negligible. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

Air-conditioning is pretty power intensive

And then, when life support fails everybody freezes for some reason.

8
skribe piefed.social skribe@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-08-27
#16 · Quote Reply

Air-conditioning is pretty power intensive and The Enterprise is a big ass ship. That's not even counting the other things life support does (like heat and CO2 scrubbing), just the air circulation. But even on the show, there's been a couple times where they mention the power from life support is nearly negligible. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

Wouldn't gravity generation and inertial dampners be part of life support? Going max impulse after turning those off is likely to end up with a lot of raspberry jam coating the walls.

28
Janx piefed.social Janx@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-12-19
#17 · Quote Reply

Yeah, but think how fast they'll be!

4
Multiplexer discuss.tchncs.de Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
Joined: 2025-08-25
#18 · (edited) Quote Reply

How does transferring heat out of a ship work? On the one hand, it's really cold in space, but on the other, there's no substrate to absorb and transfer the heat.

From a thermodynamical standpoint, the whole Enterprise is something of a mess.

But, hey, if you already have a "Heisenberg-Compensator", also having a "Boltzmann-Compensator" is probably not that implausible... ;-)

6
plantfanatic sh.itjust.works plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2025-05-25
#19 · Quote Reply

How does transferring heat out of a ship work? On the one hand, it's really cold in space, but on the other, there's no substrate to absorb and transfer the heat.

Thermal Radiation, you send it somewhere else. Itโ€™s how the sun heats our planet.

4
๐Ÿ‡ฐ ๐ŸŒ€ ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ‡ณ ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ‡ฐ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ pawb.social Kolanaki@pawb.social
Joined: 2024-10-06
#20 · (edited) Quote Reply

Wouldn't gravity generation and inertial dampners be part of life support? Going max impulse after turning those off is likely to end up with a lot of raspberry jam coating the walls.

Inertial dampeners probably not; that just stops the ship when not giving any thust because there's nothing to slow the ship down in space once it has momentum. The fake gravity on board tho, may be part of it. Not sure how the gravity plating is supposed to work; but I would be willing to bet there is technical documentation about it somewhere. Unless they just, like... Constantly barrel roll to create "gravity" that way ๐Ÿค” (gravity in quotes as it would actually be centripital force).

10
schipelblorp sh.itjust.works schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-05-16
#21 · Quote Reply

Thermal Radiation, you send it somewhere else. Itโ€™s how the sun heats our planet.

Isn't thermal radiation kinda slow, though? It's basically air cooling, but without air or fans.

2
schipelblorp sh.itjust.works schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-05-16
#22 · Quote Reply

From a thermodynamical standpoint, the whole Enterprise is something of a mess. But, hey, if you already have a "Heisenberg-Compensator", also having a "Boltzmann-Compensator" is probably not that implausible... ;-)

And you can always re-arrange the sensor arrays if you're ever really in a pinch, but it'll take some time.

7
13igtyme startrek.website 13igtyme@startrek.website
Joined: 2026-09-21
#23 · Quote Reply

Itโ€™s just written in to add weight to a tense moment. I know the reason why they did it. Still annoys me slightly. Actually even more than the techno-babble that is mentioned by most as a somewhat annoying thing written in. But I don't watch Star Trek for its scientific accuracy, so it's ok. As already said: It is still manageable by suspension of disbelief to enjoy the strong aspects of the sh...

I realize now I should have answered the question differently. The life support uses power by a reverse band of takiyons to a flow emitter. This then spread across the ship via a neutrino wave to a tungsten pulse generator.

That's why it uses so much power they have to divert it at times.

7
๐Ÿ‡ฐ ๐ŸŒ€ ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ‡ณ ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ‡ฐ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ pawb.social Kolanaki@pawb.social
Joined: 2024-10-06
#24 · Quote Reply

How does transferring heat out of a ship work? On the one hand, it's really cold in space, but on the other, there's no substrate to absorb and transfer the heat.

IIRC, they use the plasma manifold for the warp nacells to heat the ship like a radiator. I know they use that plasma for more than just the engines, but not 100% on how.

3
Multiplexer discuss.tchncs.de Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
Joined: 2025-08-25
#25 · Quote Reply

And you can always re-arrange the sensor arrays if you're ever really in a pinch, but it'll take some time.

I would consider reversing the polarity first!

6
Multiplexer discuss.tchncs.de Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
Joined: 2025-08-25
#26 · Quote Reply

I realize now I should have answered the question differently. The life support uses power by a reverse band of takiyons to a flow emitter. This then spread across the ship via a neutrino wave to a tungsten pulse generator. That's why it uses so much power they have to divert it at times.

My own head-canon that I subconsciously develop while watching those parts of the show, is actually strikingly similar to what you just said! ;-)

6
Kojichan lemmy.world Kojichan@lemmy.world
Joined: 2024-05-10
#27 · Quote Reply

Everyone knows you turn off your A/C in your car to get it to go faster!

16
GraniteM lemmy.world GraniteM@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-08-11
#28 · Quote Reply

Inertial dampeners probably not; that just stops the ship when not giving any thust because there's nothing to slow the ship down in space once it has momentum. The fake gravity on board tho, may be part of it. Not sure how the gravity plating is supposed to work; but I would be willing to bet there is technical documentation about it somewhere. Unless they just, like... Constantly barrel roll ...

I'm pretty well convinced that gravity plating has to be negligible power draw or possibly even passive technology, since they've boarded centuries-old derelict ships that still have artificial gravity. Maybe the gravity plating contains some exotic space-warping material that generates a gravity field. That could also explain the times when someone becomes intangible and can walk through walls, but don't fall through the floor.

7
schipelblorp sh.itjust.works schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-05-16
#29 · (edited) Quote Reply

I would consider reversing the polarity first!

But that could destabilize the tachyon field; is it worth risking a temporal anomaly?

Maybe if we invert the thingamajigger coils we could prevent that.

6
alpine_jim piefed.social alpine_jim@piefed.social
Joined: 2026-07-12
#30 · (edited) Quote Reply

Inertial dampeners probably not; that just stops the ship when not giving any thust because there's nothing to slow the ship down in space once it has momentum. The fake gravity on board tho, may be part of it. Not sure how the gravity plating is supposed to work; but I would be willing to bet there is technical documentation about it somewhere. Unless they just, like... Constantly barrel roll ...

Inertial dampers are how the crew can survive high-g maneuvers, they'd be pinned to the back wall and have their skulls crushed by their own faces if they suddenly went to full impulse or warp without them active.

23
krakloskewm lemmy.zip krakloskewm@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2026-10-09
#31 · Quote Reply

A bold maneuver but also wise

6
alpine_jim piefed.social alpine_jim@piefed.social
Joined: 2026-07-12
#32 · Quote Reply

Isn't thermal radiation kinda slow, though? It's basically air cooling, but without air or fans.

It is, yes. A large fraction (about a quarter?) of what looks like solar panels on the ISS are actually dedicated radiator panels. The solar panels are angled to face the sun, and the radiators are angled at 90 degrees from the sun, to face empty space.

6
samus12345 sh.itjust.works samus12345@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-07-03
#33 · Quote Reply

How did Picard get all the way over there?

4
Duamerthrax lemmy.world Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-08-27
#34 · Quote Reply

Everyone knows you turn off your A/C in your car to get it to go faster!

If you have a shitbox, it can.

17
Kojichan lemmy.world Kojichan@lemmy.world
Joined: 2024-05-10
#35 · Quote Reply

If you have a shitbox, it can.

So, anything before 2010? Got it.

5
Plastic_Ramses lemmy.world Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world
Joined: 2024-02-23
#36 · Quote Reply

I never understood the "divert power from life support" trope of Star Trek. I mean, how much power could that possibly be? We essentially already sustained prolonged life support by using a tiny batch of primitive batteries and fuels cells during multi-day trips to reach the moon in the sixties. With efficient 23th century tech, life support should be almost self-sustaining using ambient waste ...

There is an episode where Voyager is looking for a fuel source because they are dangerously low.

They cram all the staff into two decks and pull all life support from the other thirteen. It only gets them an hour of propulsion at one-quarter impulse thrust.

21
Duamerthrax lemmy.world Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-08-27
#37 · Quote Reply

So, anything before 2010? Got it.

I wouldn't know. I've never owned or drove regularly anything that was made after 99.

10
neidu4 piefed.social neidu4@piefed.social
Joined: 2026-09-10
#38 · Quote Reply

This is realistic in that they divert power from anything before gravity generation.

11
plantfanatic sh.itjust.works plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2025-05-25
#39 · Quote Reply

Isn't thermal radiation kinda slow, though? It's basically air cooling, but without air or fans.

Inefficient is maybe the right word? If you have more stuff to absorb the radiation I believe you can transfer it faster. So maybe tethering and tossing asteroids or something could be viable?

1
chuckleslord lemmy.world chuckleslord@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-12
#40 · Quote Reply

This is realistic in that they divert power from anything before gravity generation.

"Why can't we route power from gravitational engines?"

"The show's budget cannae afford such excess, Cap'n"

"What's that, Scotty?"

"The- uh- the dilithium core only works properly in a gravity field, Cap'n. We'd lose more power than we'd save."

"Ah yes, that makes sense"

17
Kojichan lemmy.world Kojichan@lemmy.world
Joined: 2024-05-10
#41 · Quote Reply

I wouldn't know. I've never owned or drove regularly anything that was made after 99.

My old 2008 Ford Focus was like that. Really weird. Guess it was just harder on the system. Ah well. It's in a better place now

6
CheesyFingers piefed.social CheesyFingers@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-06-12
#42 · Quote Reply

Related: I passed out after sex once. lol

11
Damage slrpnk.net Damage@slrpnk.net
Joined: 2023-08-03
#43 · Quote Reply

My old 2008 Ford Focus was like that. Really weird. Guess it was just harder on the system. Ah well. It's in a better place now

It's not weird at all, it's actually normal. You're running a compressor alongside your transmission when you turn on A/C. Modern systems are more efficient but there's no such thing as free energy, it will still have an effect, especially on fuel efficiency.

13
Viking_Hippie lemmy.dbzer0.com Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2024-12-04
#44 · Quote Reply

My old 2008 Ford Focus was like that. Really weird. Guess it was just harder on the system. Ah well. It's in a better place now

It's in a better place now

The Netherlands?

6
Viking_Hippie lemmy.dbzer0.com Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2024-12-04
#45 · Quote Reply

How did Picard get all the way over there?

He did his bridge shake hula with EXTRA pizzazz!

6
Melllvar startrek.website charonn0@startrek.website
Joined: 2023-07-03
#46 · Quote Reply

I never understood the "divert power from life support" trope of Star Trek. I mean, how much power could that possibly be? We essentially already sustained prolonged life support by using a tiny batch of primitive batteries and fuels cells during multi-day trips to reach the moon in the sixties. With efficient 23th century tech, life support should be almost self-sustaining using ambient waste ...

Moreover, what exactly is the life support system doing that means near-instant death if you turn it off? Breathable air and heat should last for hours at least.

6
Sundray lemmus.org sundray@lemmus.org
Joined: 2023-12-19
#47 · Quote Reply

Related: I passed out after sex once. lol

Bragger!

4
Sundray lemmus.org sundray@lemmus.org
Joined: 2023-12-19
#48 · Quote Reply

FTL moment. "I don't need oxygen, just enough power for the lasers... Oh."

On the plus side all of the fires went out.

4
Thebeardedsinglemalt lemmy.world Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
Joined: 2024-07-17
#49 · Quote Reply

This is realistic in that they divert power from anything before gravity generation.

They could, because grav plating holds a residual charge so they'll be able to maintain gravity for a period of time before people start floating

6
Xtallll lemmy.blahaj.zone Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Joined: 2023-06-18
#50 · (edited) Quote Reply

This is realistic in that they divert power from anything before gravity generation.

The artificial gravity is a byproduct of the inertial dampeners. You don't mess with the inertial dampeners unless you want the crew the slam into a bulkhead at .999C.

11
Kojichan lemmy.world Kojichan@lemmy.world
Joined: 2024-05-10
#51 · Quote Reply

It's in a better place now The Netherlands?

Ahahah! I wish. I had to sell it for scrap. The bottom was all rusted, and the frame was slightly bent. It kept leaking moisture inside.

The stereo sounded amazing though, for a stock one.

4
Post Reply Page 1 of 2   Goto page 1, 2 Last »
Back to top