RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
Red Oak man acquitted in first-of-its-kind Iowa election misconduct trial
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
Bean quokk.au Bean@quokk.au
Joined: 2025-08-24
Quote

A jury in Red Oak found Joey Norris not guilty Thursday of felony election misconduct, in what his attorney says was the first prosecution of its kind in Iowa.

18   Original
Lyrl lemmy.dbzer0.com Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2025-06-14
#2 · Quote Reply

I wasn't familiar with this case, so searched for another article that describes the alleged crime. From https://www.3newsnow.com/southwest-iowa/red-oak-man-charged-with-felony-election-misconduct-takes-stand-in-own-defense-as-jury-deliberates

Prosecutors allege he hindered the ballot count by interrupting, asking too many questions and slowing down the ability of the board to get the count done in time.
State witness Jeanice Lester was the chair of the ballot counting board. "I felt that in all the years that I served I have never witnessed or been involved in something that took so much time," she said.

And from the OP article, he spent $50,000 in legal fees. Maybe he was a poor choice for ballot worker, but that's the fault of the selection process - someone who needs the rules explained to them over and over and over should have been screened out way before election day. Punishing the person for a system problem is unfair to the person, benefits no one, and is a waste of taxpayer resources. Ugh.

2
MrNobody quokk.au MrNobody@quokk.au
Joined: 2025-11-11
#3 · Quote Reply

I wasn't familiar with this case, so searched for another article that describes the alleged crime. From https://www.3newsnow.com/southwest-iowa/red-oak-man-charged-with-felony-election-misconduct-takes-stand-in-own-defense-as-jury-deliberates Prosecutors allege he hindered the ballot count by interrupting, asking too many questions and slowing down the ability of the board to get the count don...

Another angle on this

Then, this July, the deputy sheriff of Red Oak, Iowa called Norris up and told him to surrender himself or else they would come and arrest him. Norris now faces up to five years in prison on a felony charge over a verbal disagreement he had with other election officials, who he said weren’t following the proper rules for counting absentee ballots.

The prosecution would be concerning during any administration. But it’s particularly alarming at a moment when President Donald Trump is engaged in an unprecedented nationwide assault on voting — including making probing election crime a top priority. His administration has regularly signaled that it wants a focus on election cases — a message heard loud and clear by prosecutors at every level.

Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird (R), whose office brought the case against Norris — as well as numerous other election cases — has been one of the leading state prosecutors backing the president’s attack on the right to vote.

https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/an-election-worker-tried-to-protect-mail-ballots-now-he-faces-prison-amid-trumps-push-for-voting-cases/

2
Post Reply
Back to top