| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » Law |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
autonomousPunk
belgae.social
autonomousPunk@belgae.social Joined: 2026-02-16 |
A cafe in Amsterdam was entirely digital. Had no paper menu. I had to borrow a personal smartphone from the staff to see the menu and to place an order. After paying, I asked for a receipt. They said they only give receipts by email. And because I borrowed a phone from a staff member, the receipt went to their email address. So if I were willing to supply an e-mail address, it would not matter because they had no control over that -- could not retroactively send a receipt copy. They had no printer to print a receipt. The payment services directive (PSD) says:
IIUC, by preconditioning the above info on having an email address, they are infringing on the law. Correct? It’s rough reading because it says this obligation is on “the payer’s payment service provider”. Who is that? What does that mean? The payment service provider would be the merchant’s, no? On the payer’s side of this, there is only their bank. The “without undue delay” bit seems to suggest this refers to a receipt on the spot, as banks generally only send a statement of account once per month. |
||
| 3 Original | |||
|
StabbingSky
lemmy.zip
StabbingSky@lemmy.zip Joined: 2026-04-30 |
It's a receipt from a cafe. Get over it. |
||
| -2 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |