RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
Search Categories Forum list Register Log in
About RetroFed
RetroFed

Welcome to the nostalgia-filled piefed instance of yesteryear.

Open Registration with Application questionnaire.

If you have a question or comment you can post in !meta@retrofed.com or message @DosDude@retrofed.com or @Die4Ever@retrofed.com

In case of downtime and/or emergency, we will post updates on @DosDude@mastodon.social

Some rules we try to uphold:

  • Be civil. Bigotry is not welcome. This includes (but is not limited to): transphobia, queerphobia, racism, ageism and ableism. We do not promote hate.
  • Communities need to be Retro or Retro-adjacent.
  • Please don't upload pornographic content. (use an external image host for that)
73 registered users
Administrators: DosDude, Die4Ever
Visit retrofed.com
A few paragraphs in a Meeker newspaper triggered a legal brief supporting Boulder in Supreme Court case heard on Monday
Post Reply RetroFed Forum Forum Index » Colorado
AuthorMessage
Bean quokk.au Bean@quokk.au
Joined: 2025-08-24
Quote

Link: https://bigpivots.com/unexpected-voices-in-the-national-climate-debate/

Four paragraphs buried in a story published by the Meeker Herald-Times during mid-June triggered the entry of several Colorado ranchers into the Boulder-Suncor case argued on Monday morning before the U.S. Supreme Court.
2   Original
Post Reply
Back to top
Powered by PieFed · PieBB frontend · All times are Europe/Amsterdam