| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » Fuck Cars |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Fossy
programming.dev
Fossy@programming.dev Joined: 2026-08-31 |
|
||
| 147 Original | |||
|
angelmountain
lemy.nl
angelmountain@lemy.nl Joined: 2026-02-03 |
A developed country is not a place where the poor have cars. It's where the rich use public transportation. |
||
| 59 | |||
|
nonentity
sh.itjust.works
nonentity@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2024-06-12 |
Financial obesity is neurotoxic, an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal. Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but trillionaires should be forced to transition into billionaires, and billionaires should be euthanised through taxation. |
||
| 34 | |||
|
DudleyMason
lemmy.ml
DudleyMason@lemmy.ml Joined: 2026-03-19 |
We can fix this if public transit users start gutting Billionaire capitalists. |
||
| 11 | |||
|
jtrek
startrek.website
jtrek@startrek.website Joined: 2026-02-22 |
Can we gut the billionaires instead? |
||
| 25 | |||
SuiXi3D
fedia.io
SuiXi3D@fedia.ioJoined: 2024-03-04 |
Can we gut the billionaires instead?
|
||
| 27 | |||
|
Jiral
lemmy.world
Jiral@lemmy.world Joined: 2026-06-06 |
"Disabled and low-income residents’ mobility is on the line." And that's what is wrong with Public Transportation in the US. No, not that disabled and low-income residnets can and do use it. That it is first of all seen as such, sold as such and in parts almost exclusively by those groups and only because they really have to in many cases. |
||
| 16 | |||
Steve
communick.news
Steve@communick.newsJoined: 2023-08-05 |
Can we gut the billionaires instead?
We can! |
||
| 8 | |||
|
sem
piefed.blahaj.zone
sem@piefed.blahaj.zone Joined: 2025-09-04 |
|
||
| 7 | |||
|
SnarkoPolo
lemmy.world
SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-06-08 |
Be thankful for two hours in crushing, soul destroying traffic, Peons! It's making your Job Creators more successful! They're just better than you. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
fubarx
lemmy.world
fubarx@lemmy.world Joined: 2024-06-07 |
Here's the deal. Public transit in Bay Area got slammed hard during COVID and ran huge deficits. Raising fares is a regressive tax on people who can least afford it. But having good transit means fewer cars in traffic-logged roads. Plus, easy ways to get to popular venues like sports stadiums and San Francisco. It benefits everyone directly and indirectly. A lot of people can't afford to live in city cores like SF, Oakland, and San Jose. So public transit is the only way they can get to work from affordable, outlying suburbs. Local transport agencies have done a good job scaring the crap out of people, by announcing which stops and lines will have to be shut down if this proposition doesn't pass. Entire cities will turn into unreachable islands if they shut down those lines. Given all this, any sensible person would support this. But there are absolute, self-centered idiots out there who are opposed, because it will raise muh taxes. Can't believe this is even questionably close. If it doesn't pass, I will not feel sorry one bit for those suburban voters crying that their property values just tanked and their commutes doubled. Also, this has nothing to do with billionaires. Really wish MJ wouldn't resort to this clickbaity shit. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
MJHill
piefed.world
MJHill@piefed.world Joined: 2026-10-16 |
Here's the deal. Public transit in Bay Area got slammed hard during COVID and ran huge deficits. Raising fares is a regressive tax on people who can least afford it. But having good transit means fewer cars in traffic-logged roads. Plus, easy ways to get to popular venues like sports stadiums and San Francisco. It benefits everyone directly and indirectly. A lot of people can't afford to live i...
EXCUUUUSE ME! This has everything to do with Billionaires! I was a kid in Concord touring the prototype BART cars before they had even built the first mile in the late ‘60s. And I was in Law school when Ronald RayGun’s “ Tax Simplification” act doubled the number of pages of the 1954 Tax Code it replaced. It’s always about The Billionaires and Trillionaire Wannabes! Capitalism only successfully exists when well regulated and taxed to support the infrastructure that allows it to exist. Fascists play a looooooooooooong game. They were defeated in past Wars, but never expunged. And they have infiltrated and assaulted common society for Centuries. I thought the French decapitated enough of them to teach them all a lesson. But no. They continually crawl forward, increasing the population of uneducated to fall in line with their Victimhood propaganda. So, yeah. It’s about Billionaires! |
||
| 2 | |||
Rob T Firefly
lemmy.world
rob_t_firefly@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-07 |
When Judge Doom tried this shit he got run over with a steamroller and washed away with Dip. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
Tollana1234567
lemmy.today
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today Joined: 2025-06-04 |
SF transit already been scaled back in some areas. they will word in it way to make seem like you support the funding , but actually its defunding it. plus public transport is lacking for tech biotech campuses in the bayarea to begin with, you are expected to commute excessively by car only limiting peoples options for jobs. its usually horrendous in the morning if you trying to get to any of the bridges, like bay bridges. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
Tollana1234567
lemmy.today
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today Joined: 2025-06-04 |
EXCUUUUSE ME! This has everything to do with Billionaires! I was a kid in Concord touring the prototype BART cars before they had even built the first mile in the late ‘60s. And I was in Law school when Ronald RayGun’s “ Tax Simplification” act doubled the number of pages of the 1954 Tax Code it replaced. It’s always about The Billionaires and Trillionaire Wannabes! Capitalism only successfully...
they prevent housing via nimbyism on several occasions in the bay, they solely are responsible. public transports just doesnt go far enough outside of the cities to make it useful. they always word the props in a wierd to trick you into either vote against or for a bad measure. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
Tollana1234567
lemmy.today
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today Joined: 2025-06-04 |
"Disabled and low-income residents’ mobility is on the line." And that's what is wrong with Public Transportation in the US. No, not that disabled and low-income residnets can and do use it. That it is first of all seen as such, sold as such and in parts almost exclusively by those groups and only because they really have to in many cases.
they dont have another choice, but i see alot of well off people use it too. |
||
| 1 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |