| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » California |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
CombatWombat
feddit.online
CombatWombat@feddit.onlineJoined: 2025-09-09 |
This paper examines the revenue and migration impact of the 2026 California Billionaire Tax Act, a one-time 5 percent tax on the worldwide net worth of individuals exceeding $1 billion. Using data from the Forbes Billionaire List, news reports detailing the residential real estate holdings of California billionaires, and public announcements of billionaire departures from the state, we estimate the behavioral response and associated revenue loss to this new tax using several different methodologies. Even before accounting for reductions in other tax bases such as the income tax, we estimate that the Act will collect approximately $30 billion (range $28 to 36 billion), less than a third of the $100 billion projected by Galle et al. (2025). This range accounts for the publicly confirmed taxpayer migration that has already eliminated nearly 30 percent of the Act's wealth tax base, applies a litigation-survival discount to the remaining base, and is validated by the wealth tax base elasticity literature. We estimate that California's billionaires contribute $3.3–5.8 billion annually in state income taxes. The present value of permanently lost income tax collections from departures more than offsets the one-time wealth tax revenue, yielding a net present value of negative $38.9 billion. Across 100,000 simulated revenue and discount rate combinations, 85 percent of plausible outcomes produce a negative net present value of state revenues. |
||
| 5 Original | |||
CombatWombat
feddit.online
CombatWombat@feddit.onlineJoined: 2025-09-09 |
Of course, the comparison rests on an estimate of highly confidential tax information that assumes that billionaires pay quite a bit in taxes
|
||
| 4 | |||
|
Brkdncr
lemmy.world
Brkdncr@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-11-21 |
So we get a 1 time payment of between $28b and $100b, instead of $5b yearly. We also aren’t restricting further one time taxes. I’m still not seeing the downside. |
||
| 4 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |