| Post Reply | RetroFed Forums Forum Index » Political Memes |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Lady Butterfly she/her reddthat.com ![]() LadyButterfly@reddthat.com Joined: 2025-07-04 |
|
||
| 636 Original | |||
|
shittydwarf piefed.ca shittydwarf@piefed.ca Joined: 2026-05-28 |
Yeah but those are only the one that mention the POTUS! |
||
| 24 | |||
|
freagle lemmy.ml frisbird@lemmy.ml Joined: 2025-11-24 |
If only a Democrat administration had been in control of the DOJ when it came into possession of the Epstein files, things would be so different |
||
| -7 | |||
|
NOT_RICK lemmy.world ![]() NOT_RICK@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-12 |
If only a Democrat administration had been in control of the DOJ when it came into possession of the Epstein files, things would be so different
That would’ve required Congress to pass the Epstein Files Transparency Act while Biden was prez |
||
| 22 | |||
|
freagle lemmy.ml frisbird@lemmy.ml Joined: 2025-11-24 |
That would’ve required Congress to pass the Epstein Files Transparency Act while Biden was prez
No, you have it backwards. Biden directed the DOJ to keep it all secret. The transparency act would have compelled Biden's DOJ to disclose. The act was only necessary because Biden was actively obstructing justice. |
||
| -5 | |||
|
NOT_RICK lemmy.world ![]() NOT_RICK@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-12 |
No, you have it backwards. Biden directed the DOJ to keep it all secret. The transparency act would have compelled Biden's DOJ to disclose. The act was only necessary because Biden was actively obstructing justice.
That would depend if you believe that his DOJ were withholding the release due to Maxwell’s court case and subsequent appeals. Those only ran out in October of 2025. I could easily see it being a convenient excuse but it’s plausible |
||
| 8 | |||
|
freagle lemmy.ml frisbird@lemmy.ml Joined: 2025-11-24 |
That would depend if you believe that his DOJ were withholding the release due to Maxwell’s court case and subsequent appeals. Those only ran out in October of 2025. I could easily see it being a convenient excuse but it’s plausible
Did or did not Biden believe Trump was a threat to democracy? Did he or did he not have access to the top political analysts reviewing Project 2025? Did he or did he not campaign on protecting "the soul of America" from fascism? He had literally everything he needed to protect us from the child-murdering pedophile racist but figured "meh, we'll let the vote decide it" |
||
| -2 | |||
|
StabbingSky lemmy.zip StabbingSky@lemmy.zip Joined: 2026-04-30 |
Did or did not Biden believe Trump was a threat to democracy? Did he or did he not have access to the top political analysts reviewing Project 2025? Did he or did he not campaign on protecting "the soul of America" from fascism? He had literally everything he needed to protect us from the child-murdering pedophile racist but figured "meh, we'll let the vote decide it"
He could have legally shot trump in the face, because protection of the constitution from threats foreign and domestic is an official duty of the president. |
||
| 12 | |||
|
switcheroo lemmy.world ![]() switcheroo@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-08-01 |
What's interesting about this whole debacle is the POTUS is a child rapist mentioned more times in the trumpstein files than god is in the Bible. |
||
| 20 | |||
|
danekrae lemmy.world danekrae@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-11 |
He could have legally shot trump in the face, because protection of the constitution from threats foreign and domestic is an official duty of the president.
Didn't SCOTUS also decide that a president can't break the law, even if you're selling top secret documents (that smells like shit for some reason) to foreign powers? |
||
| 5 | |||
|
StabbingSky lemmy.zip StabbingSky@lemmy.zip Joined: 2026-04-30 |
Didn't SCOTUS also decide that a president can't break the law, even if you're selling top secret documents (that smells like shit for some reason) to foreign powers?
Kinda, it has to be an official duty of the executive branch, but guess who gets to determine what an official duty is? The SC. |
||
| 5 | |||
|
MinnesotaGoddam lemmy.world ![]() HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-27 |
What's interesting about this whole debacle is the POTUS is a child rapist mentioned more times in the trumpstein files than god is in the Bible.
hey don't do Froderich von F like that. all he wanted to do was teach the dead how to dance |
||
| 1 | |||
|
heartSagan5 lemmy.zip heartSagan5@lemmy.zip Joined: 2026-05-27 |
He could have legally shot trump in the face, because protection of the constitution from threats foreign and domestic is an official duty of the president.
But still saw the inside of a prison cell because killing is not okay, which is more than Herr Dumpster Fire. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
radiofreebc lemmy.world radiofreebc@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-29 |
|
||
| 10 | |||
|
StabbingSky lemmy.zip StabbingSky@lemmy.zip Joined: 2026-04-30 |
But still saw the inside of a prison cell because killing is not okay, which is more than Herr Dumpster Fire.
No. The supreme court ruled that a president can't be charged for official acts of the office, and defending the constitution is a core duty |
||
| 2 | |||
|
freagle lemmy.ml frisbird@lemmy.ml Joined: 2025-11-24 |
Kinda, it has to be an official duty of the executive branch, but guess who gets to determine what an official duty is? The SC.
So Biden, at the end of his long life, with the full power of the state behind him, with the full awareness of what Trump meant to the future of America, did nothing because he was protecting himself from consequences? Is that what you're saying? |
||
| 1 | |||
|
StabbingSky lemmy.zip StabbingSky@lemmy.zip Joined: 2026-04-30 |
So Biden, at the end of his long life, with the full power of the state behind him, with the full awareness of what Trump meant to the future of America, did nothing because he was protecting himself from consequences? Is that what you're saying?
That's literally the opposite of what I'm saying. |
||
| 2 | |||
| Post Reply | Page 1 |