| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » Technology |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
eicker
lemmy.world
eicker@lemmy.worldJoined: 2026-07-11 |
|
||
| 213 Original | |||
eicker
lemmy.world
eicker@lemmy.worldJoined: 2026-07-11 |
Meta promised an AI built from the ground up for privacy, then built a handy directory of strangers’ loan applications and bank records. Researchers needed one query. At this point Zuckerberg calling something »private« is less a security guarantee and more a spoiler warning. |
||
| 35 | |||
|
LogicOverFeelings
piefed.ca
LogicOverFeelings@piefed.ca Joined: 2026-04-07 |
It's always the share feature isn't it? |
||
| 15 | |||
|
Australis13
fedia.io
Australis13@fedia.io Joined: 2023-06-19 |
Not a particularly well-written article. The referenced Ars Technica article actually explains the problem:
|
||
| 40 | |||
|
brlemworld
lemmy.world
brlemworld@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-08-02 |
TLDR; They make dns records for each shared chat log. Dns records can then easily be looked up and accessed Unsafe: |
||
| 17 | |||
00000
reddthat.com
00000@reddthat.comJoined: 2026-10-11 |
I'm genuinely shocked that people thought it was a good idea to put any of that into Muse in the first place. |
||
| 32 | |||
ProfessorProteus
lemmy.world
ProfessorProteus@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-07-04 |
investigators were able to easily open chat logs containing detailed private information, including corporate revenue documents, loan applications, bank transaction details, income details, and one workplace vacation calendar I'm genuinely shocked that people thought it was a good idea to put any of that into Muse in the first place.
It would be a prudent move for your mental health to lower you're expectations a tiny bit |
||
| 19 | |||
|
Venator
lemmy.nz
Venator@lemmy.nz Joined: 2023-12-28 |
Meta promised an AI built from the ground up for privacy, then built a handy directory of strangers’ loan applications and bank records. Researchers needed one query. At this point Zuckerberg calling something »private« is less a security guarantee and more a spoiler warning.
It's built for privacy in that its so bad that it causes a very small subset of people to start thinking about why privacy is a good thing actually... |
||
| 4 | |||
|
nfh
lemmy.world
nickhammes@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-10 |
Meta promised an AI built from the ground up for privacy, then built a handy directory of strangers’ loan applications and bank records. Researchers needed one query. At this point Zuckerberg calling something »private« is less a security guarantee and more a spoiler warning.
"The engineer who spent last week writing it assured Zuck that every prompt used to write it closed with make no mistakes" |
||
| 7 | |||
|
lobut
lemmy.ca
lobut@lemmy.ca Joined: 2023-06-13 |
"The engineer who spent last week writing it assured Zuck that every prompt used to write it closed with make no mistakes"
If that's not solid engineering then that engineer doesn't know what it is. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
guyoverthere123
lemmy.dbzer0.com
guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com Joined: 2024-07-31 |
If you're trusting Meta with any information, you're a fool. |
||
| 8 | |||
|
NotMyOldRedditName
lemmy.world
NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-08-24 |
Not a particularly well-written article. The referenced Ars Technica article actually explains the problem: Muse has allowed users to share searches, conversations, images, and similar content with other people. Such share features usually involve clicking an option to create a unique URL that anyone can use to load a page hosting the content. To keep potentially sensitive information from bein...
I would not call 9f21c8a3 long Wow. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
brsrklf
jlai.lu
brsrklf@jlai.lu Joined: 2023-09-03 |
If you're trusting Meta with any information, you're a fool.
I believe Meta's founder and CEO himself uses the technical term "dumb fuck" to qualify these people. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
jmill
lemmy.zip
jmill@lemmy.zip Joined: 2025-06-29 |
investigators were able to easily open chat logs containing detailed private information, including corporate revenue documents, loan applications, bank transaction details, income details, and one workplace vacation calendar I'm genuinely shocked that people thought it was a good idea to put any of that into Muse in the first place.
I mean, they are airing ads about using their AI like a personal assistant, including to pay bills. So not just knowing financial details, literal approval to spend your money for you. I hope not many people are doing that, but I'm sure some are. Absolutely insane. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
123
programming.dev
123@programming.dev Joined: 2025-07-25 |
Not a particularly well-written article. The referenced Ars Technica article actually explains the problem: Muse has allowed users to share searches, conversations, images, and similar content with other people. Such share features usually involve clicking an option to create a unique URL that anyone can use to load a page hosting the content. To keep potentially sensitive information from bein...
[deleted]
|
||
| 1 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |