| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » science |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
return2ozma
lemmy.world
return2ozma@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-07-01 |
|
||
| 96 Original | |||
|
athatet
lemmy.zip
athatet@lemmy.zip Joined: 2025-09-12 |
Viral slop. Wonderful |
||
| 27 | |||
brem
lemmy.world
brem@lemmy.worldJoined: 2024-06-09 |
At least the zombies created with AI will be extra fucking lame and predictable "That's absolutely correct, I'm definitely going to eat your brains with my teeth! Would you like more recommendations on how to eat brains?" |
||
| 40 | |||
mycodesucks
lemmy.world
mycodesucks@lemmy.worldJoined: 2024-03-08 |
"Did someone say phage?"
|
||
| 12 | |||
|
SippyCup
lemmy.world
SippyCup@lemmy.world Joined: 2026-01-26 |
[deleted]
|
||
| 1 | |||
|
peopleproblems
lemmy.world
peopleproblems@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-30 |
... is it a virus generated by LLMs, or a virus designed by a model explicitly trained on viruses? The worst damage LLMs do is when the term AI is automatically rejected by people who don't understand it. And that might be intentional. |
||
| 16 | |||
|
ZephyrXero
lemmy.world
ZephyrXero@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-14 |
Well, that's the dumbest headline I've read all week. What could possibly go wrong? |
||
| 2 | |||
|
StabbingSky
lemmy.zip
StabbingSky@lemmy.zip Joined: 2026-04-30 |
AI ≠ LLM |
||
| 17 | |||
EisFrei
lemmy.world
EisFrei@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-11 |
AI ≠ LLM
May I propose LLM ⊂ AI |
||
| 6 | |||
|
pomegranatefern
sh.itjust.works
pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2026-01-29 |
When it comes to medicine, it's best to move slowly and keep things intact, and while AI trained like this does have promise for exactly these sorts of medical purposes, it's still algorithms outputting stuff which cannot be blindly trusted. But this also isn't ChatGPT spitting out some idea of bacterial genetic code it generated from predictive text based on the collected works of Michael Crichton. Let's not spread misinformed panic. |
||
| 29 | |||
|
Mirshe
lemmy.world
Mirshe@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-21 |
Aw damn Neelix is gonna get his lungs stolen again. |
||
| 4 | |||
shalafi
lemmy.world
shalafi@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-07-22 |
AI ≠ LLM
Colloquially they're the same, but wouldn't this sort of thing more fall under machine learning? I've never been clear on the difference. You're right in any case. Just like the DC hate, blanket AI hate is going to result in friendly fire. |
||
| 6 | |||
shalafi
lemmy.world
shalafi@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-07-22 |
They can't be too new or they wouldn't be anywhere near human trials. Anyway, this is the sort of thing AI (machine learning?) excels at. Not getting excited until we see peer review, but the methodology seems sound (to me, an armchair biologist). |
||
| 5 | |||
|
dgdft
lemmy.world
dgdft@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-03-26 |
They can't be too new or they wouldn't be anywhere near human trials. Anyway, this is the sort of thing AI (machine learning?) excels at. Not getting excited until we see peer review, but the methodology seems sound (to me, an armchair biologist).
They’re skipping that whole “human trial” thing by going for a compassionate use exemption https://www.fda.gov/news-events/public-health-focus/expanded-access |
||
| 6 | |||
|
dgdft
lemmy.world
dgdft@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-03-26 |
AI ≠ LLM
I don’t disagree with the general statement… but this was specifically done with an LLM, so it seems like a moot point? |
||
| 3 | |||
|
dgdft
lemmy.world
dgdft@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-03-26 |
... is it a virus generated by LLMs, or a virus designed by a model explicitly trained on viruses? The worst damage LLMs do is when the term AI is automatically rejected by people who don't understand it. And that might be intentional.
Based on the linked paper, it reads like they took an existing open weight LLM, tacked on a scheme to parse and output genomics data, and finetuned it a bit. It’s the same approach chatgpt and other big-name models use for reading and producing images, but applied to a different data format. |
||
| 5 | |||
shalafi
lemmy.world
shalafi@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-07-22 |
They’re skipping that whole “human trial” thing by going for a compassionate use exemption https://www.fda.gov/news-events/public-health-focus/expanded-access
I'm down for that and think it needs expanded. If I'm terminal, I want the choice to be used as an experiment, assuming the FDA finds the treatment somewhat viable. Dad had mesothelioma from serving on a WWII destroyer (asbestos wrapped pipes, all those men died by the 80s). He went to some quack in the Bahamas who mixed up snake oil from all his patient's plasma, patients who later tested positive for AIDS. AIDS hit the public conscious right about when dad died. One wonders... |
||
| 6 | |||
|
dgdft
lemmy.world
dgdft@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-03-26 |
I'm down for that and think it needs expanded. If I'm terminal, I want the choice to be used as an experiment, assuming the FDA finds the treatment somewhat viable. Dad had mesothelioma from serving on a WWII destroyer (asbestos wrapped pipes, all those men died by the 80s). He went to some quack in the Bahamas who mixed up snake oil from all his patient's plasma, patients who later tested posi...
Yeah, totally agreed. It’s a tough balancing act to filter the snake oil while taking viable moonshots, but I think that’s a niche that the US regulatory regime has generally done well on, all things considered. |
||
| 4 | |||
Zos_Kia
jlai.lu
Zos_Kia@jlai.luJoined: 2026-02-16 |
So uuuuh... Bioslop? |
||
| 7 | |||
|
Avicenna
programming.dev
Avicenna@programming.dev Joined: 2025-11-07 |
They can't be too new or they wouldn't be anywhere near human trials. Anyway, this is the sort of thing AI (machine learning?) excels at. Not getting excited until we see peer review, but the methodology seems sound (to me, an armchair biologist).
Yeah my first question was "how the hell did they get approval for a human trial". Until covid I don't think you would even be able to get approval for mRNA flu vaccine human trials. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
Treczoks
lemmy.world
Treczoks@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-09 |
That was one of the headlines I was very afraid of. The point that this is "just" a bacteriophage mitigates it a bit, assuming that they just modified the anchoring and injection RNA code, but even this might get out of hand. |
||
| 5 | |||
|
peopleproblems
lemmy.world
peopleproblems@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-30 |
Based on the linked paper, it reads like they took an existing open weight LLM, tacked on a scheme to parse and output genomics data, and finetuned it a bit. It’s the same approach chatgpt and other big-name models use for reading and producing images, but applied to a different data format.
Yeah see that is what I couldn't figure out, but it lines up. It's not how I would generate anything other than text and certainly not any sort of medical treatment |
||
| 2 | |||
|
Pratai
piefed.ca
Pratai@piefed.ca Joined: 2026-02-12 |
Yeah, I’d die before I let them do this shit to me. |
||
| 1 | |||
🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮
pawb.social
Kolanaki@pawb.socialJoined: 2024-10-06 |
Do any other furries see what I see in that thumbnail? 🥵 |
||
| 0 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |