RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
Trump refuses to endorse JD Vance's presidential bid in latest brutal snub of VP
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
ExtremeDullard piefed.social ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-08-25
Quote

President Donald Trump declined to endorse Vice President JD Vance for the 2028 presidential election during a press briefing in Ireland

502   Original
ExtremeDullard piefed.social ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-08-25
#2 · Quote Reply

JD sold whatever soul he possessed for power, but he remains a terminal loser.

84
artyom piefed.social artyom@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-06-08
#3 · Quote Reply

Yeah I mean Trump wants to run in 2028, why would he endorse someone else?

162
Kirp123 lemmy.world Kirp123@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-02-06
#4 · Quote Reply

Nobody likes JD Vance.

72
betterdeadthanreddit lemmy.world betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-06
#5 · Quote Reply

Nobody likes JD Vance.

I do like his pope-killing record but that's about it.

16
Kirp123 lemmy.world Kirp123@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-02-06
#6 · Quote Reply

I do like his pope-killing record but that's about it.

He does seem to kill everything he touches. He went and endorsed Orban and he immediately lost the election LMAO.

32
Triumph fedia.io Triumph@fedia.io
Joined: 2025-09-19
#7 · Quote Reply

He's posturing by saying "they're all very good" in order to get the most people to pay him off.

15
Diplomjodler lemmy.world Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world
Joined: 2024-01-08
#8 · Quote Reply

He does seem to kill everything he touches. He went and endorsed Orban and he immediately lost the election LMAO.

Only the one person that would least be missed seems to be immune.

16
theparadox lemmy.world theparadox@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-31
#9 · Quote Reply

Yeah I mean Trump wants to run in 2028, why would he endorse someone else?

Probably family.

30
artyom piefed.social artyom@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-06-08
#10 · Quote Reply

Probably family.

What about what family?

12
rockSlayer lemmy.blahaj.zone rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Joined: 2025-02-24
#11 · (edited) Quote Reply

Can we FUCKING FINISH THIS ELECTION FIRST BEFORE WE TALK ABOUT 2028?

87
theparadox lemmy.world theparadox@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-31
#12 · Quote Reply

What about what family?

He might endorse his own family if he doesn't run himself. All the benefits, none of the work.

33
artyom piefed.social artyom@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-06-08
#13 · Quote Reply

He might endorse his own family if he doesn't run himself. All the benefits, none of the work.

Don't think he cares about his family. He wants the glory for himself. But it's a good guess.

29
dhork lemmy.world dhork@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-15
#14 · (edited) Quote Reply

Don't think he cares about his family. He wants the glory for himself. But it's a good guess.

I can see Trump Jr. running on a explicit platform of "I will let my dad live in his bunker in the WH basement and make all the decisions"

32
theparadox lemmy.world theparadox@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-31
#15 · Quote Reply

Don't think he cares about his family. He wants the glory for himself. But it's a good guess.

I think it depends on which family member and how recently he has taken his meds.

3
vegeta lemmy.world vegeta@lemmy.world
Joined: 2024-02-21
#16 · Quote Reply

Better get to work JD

19
Zephorah discuss.online Zephorah@discuss.online
Joined: 2025-07-01
#17 · Quote Reply

Probably family.

Dear god. Junior is going to run. That’s the 7 in this range of possibilities.

4
WaitingTech lemmy.world waitingtech@lemmy.world
Joined: 2026-06-10
#18 · Quote Reply

I can see Trump Jr. running on a explicit platform of "I will let my dad live in his bunker in the WH basement and make all the decisions"

Which one? Cokey McSniffles or the dumb one?

8
Eat_Your_Paisley lemmy.world Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-06-13
#19 · Quote Reply

Little Marco is the heir no one likes JD

2
Stormy thelemmy.club Stormy@thelemmy.club
Joined: 2026-02-16
#20 · Quote Reply

Which one? Cokey McSniffles or the dumb one?

No, eric is the ugly one.

I do like how we all know the one with a vagina isn't even in the realm of possibilities for them.

8
NekoKoneko lemmy.world NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
Joined: 2026-02-18
#21 · Quote Reply

Can we FUCKING FINISH THIS ELECTION FIRST BEFORE WE TALK ABOUT 2028?

Oh man, no, 2026 is already in the bag for Democrats, we got the House and Senate - no need to even vote anymore, just take it easy and enjoy the 2028 race!

/s

40
13igtyme startrek.website 13igtyme@startrek.website
Joined: 2026-09-21
#22 · Quote Reply

No, eric is the ugly one. I do like how we all know the one with a vagina isn't even in the realm of possibilities for them.

They're all the ugly ones.

4
rebelsimile sh.itjust.works rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-07-09
#23 · Quote Reply

Can we FUCKING FINISH THIS ELECTION FIRST BEFORE WE TALK ABOUT 2028?

talking about the next election (2028) is the fastest track to acknowleding the lame-ducked-ness of the current occupant. I say speculate away.

9
Microtonal_Banana lemmy.zip Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-09-30
#24 · Quote Reply

He has no intention of transferring power peacefully to anyone.

70
Stormy thelemmy.club Stormy@thelemmy.club
Joined: 2026-02-16
#25 · Quote Reply

They're all the ugly ones.

But genuinely a fucked up face, that's Eric and barron.

2
rockSlayer lemmy.blahaj.zone rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Joined: 2025-02-24
#26 · (edited) Quote Reply

talking about the next election (2028) is the fastest track to acknowleding the lame-ducked-ness of the current occupant. I say speculate away.

No. We should not be talking about elections 2 YEARS IN ADVANCE! it's not fucking normal! I do not want every day of every year to be occupied by electoralism.

27
JasonDJ lemmy.zip JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2024-01-16
#27 · Quote Reply

That may actually be good for Vance...

20
TryingToBeGood reddthat.com TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com
Joined: 2026-03-31
#28 · Quote Reply

Even a broken clock’s right twice a day.

5
TrackenDaKracken lemmy.world TrackenDaKracken@lemmy.world
Joined: 2026-09-29
#29 · Quote Reply

Trump betrays literally everyone who ever trusts him.

42
TrackenDaKracken lemmy.world TrackenDaKracken@lemmy.world
Joined: 2026-09-29
#30 · Quote Reply

I hope they run Vance. Better him, with four years of on-the-record stupidity to call out, than a virtual unknown with a whitewashed past.

3
rebelsimile sh.itjust.works rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-07-09
#31 · Quote Reply

No. We should not be talking about elections 2 YEARS IN ADVANCE! it's not fucking normal! I do not want every day of every year to be occupied by electoralism.

In American electoral politics, it is ‘fucking normal’ to be talking about the next presidential election cycle following the midterms, and the midterms are in like 2 weeks. It’s ‘fucking normal’ to start marginalizing the current administration because they can’t run for re-election again and to start focusing on new people, and despite your hysterics, I think we could actually agree that paying less attention to Donald Trump would be a great thing for literally everybody, so calm your fucking tits.

6
rockSlayer lemmy.blahaj.zone rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Joined: 2025-02-24
#32 · (edited) Quote Reply

In American electoral politics, it is ‘fucking normal’ to be talking about the next presidential election cycle following the midterms, and the midterms are in like 2 weeks. It’s ‘fucking normal’ to start marginalizing the current administration because they can’t run for re-election again and to start focusing on new people, and despite your hysterics, I think we could actually agree that payi...

following the midterms

One problem. The midterms haven't even finished. This is preceding the midterms.

It’s ‘fucking normal’ to start marginalizing the current administration

That's fine. But we don't need to start talking about elections! It leads to thinks like good ol' Mitch saying we can't let Congress vote on a SCOTUS position because we're a year away from an election.

Your patronizing tone is not welcome. I don't fucking care what the status quo is, I'm sick and fucking tired of the status quo.

16
Gaslov lemmy.world Gaslov@lemmy.world
Joined: 2026-08-17
#33 · Quote Reply

I think it's 50/50 on whether or not he even runs for president. Rubio is probably the biggest Republican contender for that race at the moment.

5
rebelsimile sh.itjust.works rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-07-09
#34 · Quote Reply

following the midterms One problem. The midterms haven't even finished. This is preceding the midterms. It’s ‘fucking normal’ to start marginalizing the current administration That's fine. But we don't need to start talking about elections! It leads to thinks like good ol' Mitch saying we can't let Congress vote on a SCOTUS position because we're a year away from an election. Your patronizing t...

It’s also normal for them to put christmas decorations out in some stores before thanksgiving and you’ll still get people whining that it’s too soon or whatever. This is all just a weird complaint, because it happens every election cycle, and, we’d ideally like to move on. The zombie corpse of Mitch McConnell can read a calendar and the political reality as much as anyone. They’ll use whatever tricks they have to fuck over as many people as they can as long as they can. But we need to start talking about whatever the post-Trump era will look like, nobody wants to stay mired in this.

-2
rockSlayer lemmy.blahaj.zone rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Joined: 2025-02-24
#35 · (edited) Quote Reply

It’s also normal for them to put christmas decorations out in some stores before thanksgiving and you’ll still get people whining that it’s too soon or whatever. This is all just a weird complaint, because it happens every election cycle, and, we’d ideally like to move on. The zombie corpse of Mitch McConnell can read a calendar and the political reality as much as anyone. They’ll use whatever ...

In case you forgot, that wasn't a hypothetical. It actually occurred during Obama's admin. Enough people thought "yea that sounds right" to the point that there wasn't even a procedural change in SCOTUS selection.

Christmas decorations being up early is one thing. Talking about electoral politics is an entirely different thing, that actually has consequences. People tune out of politics all together because we talk about elections years before they actually happen.

Both parties absolutely love that we spend all our time with politics discussing elections, because all they do day in and day out is fundraise for their parties. Assuming that they never eat or sleep, politicians in both parties have less than 30 seconds to review bills before they vote on them, because of all the fundraising they do. The constant electoralism means that they never have to change.

8
OBJECTION! lemmy.ml Objection@lemmy.ml
Joined: 2024-04-30
#36 · Quote Reply

It should be illegal to endorse a candidate for president before the midterms. Or to ask someone to. What an absolute non-story.

How long do you want the election season to be? Two fucking years isn't enough? Mexico gets it done in 90 days.

21
DonkeyStar lemmy.world DonkeyStar@lemmy.world
Joined: 2026-07-23
#37 · Quote Reply

“Who do you want in the White House when you leave?”

“When I what!?”

52
CharlesDarwin lemmy.world CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-22
#38 · Quote Reply

Trump betrays literally everyone who ever trusts him.

Classic narcissist.

8
CharlesDarwin lemmy.world CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-22
#39 · Quote Reply

It’s also normal for them to put christmas decorations out in some stores before thanksgiving and you’ll still get people whining that it’s too soon or whatever. This is all just a weird complaint, because it happens every election cycle, and, we’d ideally like to move on. The zombie corpse of Mitch McConnell can read a calendar and the political reality as much as anyone. They’ll use whatever ...

Heh, Costco has them out as of a few weeks ago (at least) and it's not even freaking Halloween yet.

1
CharlesDarwin lemmy.world CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-22
#40 · Quote Reply

"JD" "Vance", who called donnie "America's Hitler"?

25
rebelsimile sh.itjust.works rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-07-09
#41 · Quote Reply

In case you forgot, that wasn't a hypothetical. It actually occurred during Obama's admin. Enough people thought "yea that sounds right" to the point that there wasn't even a procedural change in SCOTUS selection. Christmas decorations being up early is one thing. Talking about electoral politics is an entirely different thing, that actually has consequences. People tune out of politics all tog...

In case you forgot, that wasn't a hypothetical. It actually occurred during Obama's admin. Enough people thought "yea that sounds right" to the point that there wasn't even a procedural change in SCOTUS selection

And then one of those ghouls, Barrett? was sworn in like 2 weeks before an election when it suited their needs.

3
rockSlayer lemmy.blahaj.zone rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Joined: 2025-02-24
#42 · Quote Reply

In case you forgot, that wasn't a hypothetical. It actually occurred during Obama's admin. Enough people thought "yea that sounds right" to the point that there wasn't even a procedural change in SCOTUS selection And then one of those ghouls, Barrett? was sworn in like 2 weeks before an election when it suited their needs.

Yes, I know. Mitch did that one too, and has to do with Mitch weaponizing the fact that people tune out of politics because of constant electoralism. It's not just Mitch, it's not just Republicans, it's the underlying system. Part of that underlying system is constant electoralism.

3
CombatWombat feddit.online CombatWombat@feddit.online
Joined: 2025-09-09
#43 · Quote Reply

Can we FUCKING FINISH THIS ELECTION FIRST BEFORE WE TALK ABOUT 2028?

Precisely. I hate to say it, but I agree with Trump here (about it being too early, not about JD being terrific)

"It's too early," Trump responded. "I mean, it's too early. I think he's terrific. There's so many terrific people."

6
rebelsimile sh.itjust.works rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-07-09
#44 · Quote Reply

Yes, I know. Mitch did that one too, and has to do with Mitch weaponizing the fact that people tune out of politics because of constant electoralism. It's not just Mitch, it's not just Republicans, it's the underlying system. Part of that underlying system is constant electoralism.

your thesis is that people weren’t tuned into the election 2 weeks before the election?

1
rockSlayer lemmy.blahaj.zone rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Joined: 2025-02-24
#45 · (edited) Quote Reply

your thesis is that people weren’t tuned into the election 2 weeks before the election?

My thesis is that electoralism is so constant that enough people agreed with him in 2016 to the point where no changes were made to SCOTUS selection, setting himself up to just do what he wanted. The Democratic party was pissed at both situations, but they saw fundraising opportunities instead of actually fucking doing something.

2
jpreston1986 lemmy.world jpreston1986@lemmy.world
Joined: 2026-10-08
#46 · Quote Reply

it's funny to me that people are pretending like he's not just going to run again. He wants to be a dictator just like his favorite people, pootin and kim jong un. And all his stupid mouth breathing knuckle dragging supporters will just line up with whatever dumb bullshit excuse is fed to them "but presidents are only limited to two consecutive terms!" "but FDR!" "but he's a war-time president!"

There is no level of duplicitous stupidity these traitors won't stoop to.

48
Lushed_Lungfish lemmy.ca Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2025-02-14
#47 · Quote Reply

He has no intention of transferring power peacefully to anyone.

Then it is up to the people of America to transfer it violently on his behalf.

10
🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞 lemmy.world daychilde@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-13
#48 · Quote Reply

I think it's 50/50 on whether or not he even runs for president. Rubio is probably the biggest Republican contender for that race at the moment.

I think it’s 50/50 on whether or not he even runs for president.

I like that this could be about Vance or Trump. Although I think there's more than a 50% chance Trump will try to run. And maybe a 50% chance Vance will. lol

3
DementedSociety lemmy.world DementedSociety@lemmy.world
Joined: 2026-07-30
#49 · Quote Reply

Traitors DESERVE TO BE EXECUTED! By due process or civilian intervention.

11
rebelsimile sh.itjust.works rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-07-09
#50 · Quote Reply

My thesis is that electoralism is so constant that enough people agreed with him in 2016 to the point where no changes were made to SCOTUS selection, setting himself up to just do what he wanted. The Democratic party was pissed at both situations, but they saw fundraising opportunities instead of actually fucking doing something.

I read that situation as the republicans had the democrats in complete checkmate and just did what they wanted to do. They made up arguments on the fly to suit their needs, and I think they will continue to do that in the future. The US is a system in which there will be constant elections, so try not to get too twisted about that?

2
rockSlayer lemmy.blahaj.zone rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Joined: 2025-02-24
#51 · (edited) Quote Reply

I read that situation as the republicans had the democrats in complete checkmate and just did what they wanted to do. They made up arguments on the fly to suit their needs, and I think they will continue to do that in the future. The US is a system in which there will be constant elections, so try not to get too twisted about that?

I will rage against the dying of the light. I will not go gentle into that good night.

3
Post Reply Page 1 of 3   Goto page 1, 2, 3 Last »
Back to top