| Post Reply | RetroFed Forums Forum Index » TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
The Picard Maneuver lemmy.world ![]() The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-22 |
|
||
| 64 Original | |||
|
schipelblorp sh.itjust.works schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2026-05-16 |
I'd like to argue that the sex drive of the future is somewhat different, but the reaction to Betazoid pheromes make it a hard case to make. |
||
| 11 | |||
|
cybervseas lemmy.world cybervseas@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-12 |
I'd like to argue that the sex drive of the future is somewhat different, but the reaction to Betazoid pheromes make it a hard case to make.
We witness the future equivalent of professional military service, and mostly follow officers on those ships. And almost always see them in uniform. Perhaps sex drive isn't different but we're witnessing workplace professionalism. |
||
| 18 | |||
|
schipelblorp sh.itjust.works schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2026-05-16 |
We witness the future equivalent of professional military service, and mostly follow officers on those ships. And almost always see them in uniform. Perhaps sex drive isn't different but we're witnessing workplace professionalism.
Yes, the univeral and unrealistic competence of the crew extends beyond technical skills to emotional ones--nobody ever abuses their authority over a failed relationship. Edit: Am I saying it's impossible that it could become a reality? Maybe I'm being too pessimistic about human nature; but I think between military strucutre and being stuck in a tin can full time for years together, things would be messier. Maybe some sailors would like to chime in. |
||
| 11 | |||
|
CyberEgg discuss.tchncs.de ![]() CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de Joined: 2023-06-22 |
Many of us probably would. Myself however would much more likely go the other Barkley.and mutter "Computer, end programme!" every now and then. |
||
| 15 | |||
|
CIA_chatbot lemmy.world CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-19 |
I'd like to argue that the sex drive of the future is somewhat different, but the reaction to Betazoid pheromes make it a hard case to make.
A “hard” case you say? |
||
| 2 | |||
|
GalacticGrapefruit lemmy.world GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-01-30 |
Me, an asexual: "Heh. Skill issue." |
||
| 1 | |||
|
Kowowow lemmy.ca Kowowow@lemmy.ca Joined: 2023-06-14 |
Lamia gf you say? |
||
| 9 | |||
|
okwhateverdude lemmy.world okwhateverdude@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-08-01 |
Yes, the univeral and unrealistic competence of the crew extends beyond technical skills to emotional ones--nobody ever abuses their authority over a failed relationship. Edit: Am I saying it's impossible that it could become a reality? Maybe I'm being too pessimistic about human nature; but I think between military strucutre and being stuck in a tin can full time for years together, things wou...
Nah, not too pessimistic. Unless everyone is genetically modified (only through Dr. Bashir and the misfits do we know at least some were), everyone exists on a normal distribution. Lower Decks is arguably closer to what the humans would actually be like. |
||
| 7 | |||
|
Onomatopoeia lemmy.cafe Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe Joined: 2025-01-02 |
Nah, not too pessimistic. Unless everyone is genetically modified (only through Dr. Bashir and the misfits do we know at least some were), everyone exists on a normal distribution. Lower Decks is arguably closer to what the humans would actually be like.
Lower Decks is the best version of Trek in my opinion. It's messy. I appreciate the episodes we got, maybe they'll reboot it. |
||
| 9 | |||
|
schipelblorp sh.itjust.works schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2026-05-16 |
Nah, not too pessimistic. Unless everyone is genetically modified (only through Dr. Bashir and the misfits do we know at least some were), everyone exists on a normal distribution. Lower Decks is arguably closer to what the humans would actually be like.
Yes, Lower Decks introduces blatant nepotism into the Star Fleet canon as well. Gotta pick up Season 3, soon. |
||
| 5 | |||
|
okwhateverdude lemmy.world okwhateverdude@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-08-01 |
There are more options than going full Barclay. You could go full Geordi only I'd just end up making another Moriarty rather than a Leah as a research partner. Or I make another me to collaborate with. Sex is great and all, but I have much better uses for a holodeck. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
grue lemmy.world grue@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-13 |
This is canonically true!
|
||
| 8 | |||
|
agentTeiko piefed.social agentTeiko@piefed.social Joined: 2026-01-29 |
Hell good full sensory VR and I'm ready to check out of this reality. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
FartMaster69 lemmy.dbzer0.com FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com Joined: 2024-12-06 |
Fantasies wasn’t were Barcley went wrong, it was involving coworkers without consent. |
||
| 8 | |||
|
Not a newt piefed.ca lemmyng@piefed.ca Joined: 2025-06-07 |
That was essentially the premise of Westworld (the series, not the films.) |
||
| 3 | |||
|
Boomer Humor Doomergod lemmy.world ![]() Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world Joined: 2024-03-15 |
Full Barclay? Nah, I’m going full Bortus. |
||
| 7 | |||
|
LordKitsuna lemmy.world LordKitsuna@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-22 |
Me, an asexual: "Heh. Skill issue."
While everyone is making jokes about sex, Barkley basically just used it as an escape. He created fake versions of his friends and coworkers that he could more easily be confident around, and you being asexual does not preclude you! We are all equally vulnerable yay~ |
||
| 2 | |||
|
schipelblorp sh.itjust.works schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2026-05-16 |
Fantasies wasn’t were Barcley went wrong, it was involving coworkers without consent.
Wait, am I supposed to get consent to fantasize about coworkers? |
||
| 5 | |||
|
CannonFodder lemmy.world CannonFodder@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-08-22 |
Wait, am I supposed to get consent to fantasize about coworkers?
I always get permissions from coworkers before i wank to pictures of them. I feel this builds a better relationship. |
||
| 3 | |||
| Post Reply | Page 1 |