| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » Technology |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
beep
piefed.world
beep@piefed.worldJoined: 2026-04-08 |
|
||
| 12 Original | |||
|
Blaster M
lemmy.world
Blaster_M@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-08 |
Considering CGPT et al were getting ~48 percent accuracy versus the old tuned net's ~64 percent, we're still dealing with coin toss odds here. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
brucethemoose
lemmy.world
brucethemoose@lemmy.world Joined: 2024-03-22 |
Not a surprise at all, as those old CNNs are tuned specifically for the task. |
||
| 6 | |||
|
cactusupyourbutt
lemmy.world
cactusupyourbutt@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-09 |
Considering CGPT et al were getting ~48 percent accuracy versus the old tuned net's ~64 percent, we're still dealing with coin toss odds here.
I thought that as well, but its not a yes/no question, its „which of these 6 diognoses“ |
||
| 2 | |||
|
terabyterex
lemmy.world
terabyterex@lemmy.world Joined: 2026-03-06 |
no shit. this post is dumb. when they say in the news that *ai" is great at science/medical thing, thry arent talking about llms. a lotof bteakthrough was done with google alphafold. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
nilloc
discuss.tchncs.de
nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de Joined: 2023-06-22 |
I thought that as well, but its not a yes/no question, its „which of these 6 diognoses“
Yeah and the neural network is still 16% better, which isn’t insignificant. |
||
| 1 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |