RetroFed Forums
Your home away from modern life.
Lula Wins a Record Fourth Term in Brazil in a Surprise Comeback
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
TheTechnician27 lemmy.world TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
Joined: 2024-07-25
(edited) Quote

Live results here via Brazil's UOL.

267   Original
ShinkanTrain lemmy.ml ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
Joined: 2024-06-13
#2 · (edited) Quote Reply

Now we wait for the US to stage the coup.

69
supersquirrel lemmy.ca supersquirrel@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2026-08-07
#3 · Quote Reply

HELL YEAH! 🥳 🥳 💫

32
CompactFlax discuss.tchncs.de CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
Joined: 2025-02-14
#4 · Quote Reply

Omg yes.

27
frongt lemmy.zip frongt@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-07-31
#5 · Quote Reply

Now we wait for the US to stage the coup.

Hitler Mussolini Simeón Flores is centrist, actually

23
psycho_driver lemmy.world psycho_driver@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-18
#6 · (edited) Quote Reply

Now we wait for the US to stage the coup.

Brazil might be a hard ask. Particularly if there has been trickle down imbecility at the three letter agencies, as I suspect there has.

3
Deacon lemmy.world deacon@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-13
#7 · Quote Reply

Much needed after BC.

15
AlecSadler lemmy.dbzer0.com AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2026-01-03
#8 · Quote Reply

Much needed after BC.

The BC event really made me sad. :/

5
SpaceCowboy lemmy.ca SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-06-17
#9 · Quote Reply

Much needed after BC.

BC was a decision between a center-left candidate (who was doing some stupid election shenanigans) and a center-center candidate (who is by all reports the most boring politician they could find) in a province in Canada.

This is not any way comparable to a country of over 200M people potentially falling to fascism.

8
Deacon lemmy.world deacon@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-13
#10 · Quote Reply

BC was a decision between a center-left candidate (who was doing some stupid election shenanigans) and a center-center candidate (who is by all reports the most boring politician they could find) in a province in Canada. This is not any way comparable to a country of over 200M people potentially falling to fascism.

Do they need to be comparable for me to feel a certain way about their respective outcomes? Both matter to me.

5
SpaceCowboy lemmy.ca SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-06-17
#11 · Quote Reply

This is why I really like the run-off system of the non-instant variety. It gives people a clear choice and a chance to think. People that might not have voted the first round see a stark choice and may think "yeah I better go vote or we'll have another Bolsanaro running things and I don't want that."

Congrats to Brazil!

26
SpaceCowboy lemmy.ca SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-06-17
#12 · Quote Reply

Do they need to be comparable for me to feel a certain way about their respective outcomes? Both matter to me.

To feel like it's relevant in a thread about an election in another country, yes, it should be comparable.

You should probably work on your empathy a little more if over 200 million people facing fascism gives you the same feelings as a province electing a boring centrist.

0
rbos lemmy.ca rbos@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-06-08
#13 · (edited) Quote Reply

BC was a decision between a center-left candidate (who was doing some stupid election shenanigans) and a center-center candidate (who is by all reports the most boring politician they could find) in a province in Canada. This is not any way comparable to a country of over 200M people potentially falling to fascism.

The Tories are still going to fuck up treaty negotiations, wreck sex education, push old growth logging, and sell off our health system. They'll probably also repeal the single-family home zoning ban.

Going to be a rough FO cycle.

3
Deacon lemmy.world deacon@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-13
#14 · Quote Reply

To feel like it's relevant in a thread about an election in another country, yes, it should be comparable. You should probably work on your empathy a little more if over 200 million people facing fascism gives you the same feelings as a province electing a boring centrist.

Thank you, I am working on it right now.

1
minorkeys sh.itjust.works minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-04-22
#15 · Quote Reply

This is why I really like the run-off system of the non-instant variety. It gives people a clear choice and a chance to think. People that might not have voted the first round see a stark choice and may think "yeah I better go vote or we'll have another Bolsanaro running things and I don't want that." Congrats to Brazil!

Agreed, I like it.

5
ddh lemmy.sdf.org DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org
Joined: 2023-06-10
#16 · (edited) Quote Reply

Agreed, I like it.

But why multiple election days when you can have a preferential voting system that has runoff inbuilt?

Thank goodness for this outcome though.

10
ruuster13 lemmy.zip ruuster13@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-07-09
#17 · Quote Reply

Lula in, Vucic out. Today was a good day for democracy.

18
lokalhorst feddit.org lokalhorst@feddit.org
Joined: 2026-04-25
#18 · Quote Reply

Now we wait for the US to stage the coup.

11
smeenz lemmy.nz smeenz@lemmy.nz
Joined: 2023-07-11
#19 · Quote Reply

But why multiple election days when you can have a preferential voting system that has runoff inbuilt? Thank goodness for this outcome though.

Because it provides for the opportunity to strategically vote based on the results of the previous round.

0
ddh lemmy.sdf.org DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org
Joined: 2023-06-10
#20 · Quote Reply

Because it provides for the opportunity to strategically vote based on the results of the previous round.

But it's still down to two and you have one preference. What's the strategy?

4
Hapankaali lemmy.world Hapankaali@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-09-17
#21 · Quote Reply

This is why I really like the run-off system of the non-instant variety. It gives people a clear choice and a chance to think. People that might not have voted the first round see a stark choice and may think "yeah I better go vote or we'll have another Bolsanaro running things and I don't want that." Congrats to Brazil!

The two-round system is actually very similar in its dynamics to instant runoff voting or FPTP with primaries. All these systems feature a centre squeeze. FPTP without primaries is actually a better system, albeit obviously still vastly inferior to a proportional system, which is what all top-tier democracies (and economies for that matter) use. In the FPTP-without-primary era, the US still had statesmen with broad support as presidents (e.g., FDR, Eisenhower, Theodore Roosevelt), and the election of a Trump would have been unfathomable (at least, on the Republican ticket).

1
Post Reply
Back to top