| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » Progressive Politics |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pratai
piefed.ca
Pratai@piefed.ca Joined: 2026-02-12 |
This topic has been removed by a moderator.
|
||
| 189 Original | |||
Boomer Humor Doomergod
lemmy.world
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.worldJoined: 2024-03-15 |
I get that voting will elect a Congress that won’t do stupid shit like this. I already voted. But even if the Dems win most of the elections next week, what can they actually do to stop this? It’s been passed as a law, so ostensibly they’d need Trump’s signature on a bill they pass or 2/3 vote in both houses to overturn it. And even if they win tremendously outperform the polls they won’t have 2/3 majority and Trump won’t sign anything from them. So while I agree voting is necessary it is not sufficient to stop this. That vote had to happen two years ago, and we need to help people who will be without insurance by 2027 regardless of if we voted. (Cue infighting about the vote two years ago.) It really is a spectacularly awful form of government. After all, it’s the best humans can come up with. |
||
| 25 | |||
|
Hello_there
fedia.io
Hello_there@fedia.io Joined: 2024-03-20 |
California has Prop 40. |
||
| 5 | |||
|
Pratai
piefed.ca
Pratai@piefed.ca Joined: 2026-02-12 |
California has Prop 40.
I called my insurance, it’s nationwide. States have no say. |
||
| 5 | |||
|
HubertManne
piefed.social
HubertManne@piefed.social Joined: 2025-03-13 |
I get that voting will elect a Congress that won’t do stupid shit like this. I already voted. But even if the Dems win most of the elections next week, what can they actually do to stop this? It’s been passed as a law, so ostensibly they’d need Trump’s signature on a bill they pass or 2/3 vote in both houses to overturn it. And even if they win tremendously outperform the polls they won’t have ...
what ti comes down to is how bad teh republicans lose. Some might cross the isle if they lose seats that were supposed to be safe. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
frustrated_phagocytosis
fedia.io
frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io Joined: 2024-03-03 |
I get that voting will elect a Congress that won’t do stupid shit like this. I already voted. But even if the Dems win most of the elections next week, what can they actually do to stop this? It’s been passed as a law, so ostensibly they’d need Trump’s signature on a bill they pass or 2/3 vote in both houses to overturn it. And even if they win tremendously outperform the polls they won’t have ...
I suppose the idea now is that you prevent further massive cuts to the programs. We certainly won't get a return to what they were in 2024, but I guarantee another GOP congress would bleed out these programs like they were a pregnant mistress. It's like their second favorite thing to do after harassing minorities and attacking women's rights |
||
| 13 | |||
Boomer Humor Doomergod
lemmy.world
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.worldJoined: 2024-03-15 |
what ti comes down to is how bad teh republicans lose. Some might cross the isle if they lose seats that were supposed to be safe.
I can think of exactly once when a Republican crossed the aisle to do something good. And he’s dead now. |
||
| 9 | |||
Boomer Humor Doomergod
lemmy.world
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.worldJoined: 2024-03-15 |
I suppose the idea now is that you prevent further massive cuts to the programs. We certainly won't get a return to what they were in 2024, but I guarantee another GOP congress would bleed out these programs like they were a pregnant mistress. It's like their second favorite thing to do after harassing minorities and attacking women's rights
Yeah, I get that. But OP’s pitch of “we need to vote to stop this” is just wrong. We need to build a time machine to stop this. I think overselling what votes can actually do makes people less likely to vote. |
||
| 3 | |||
UnderpantsWeevil
lemmy.world
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-14 |
I called my insurance, it’s nationwide. States have no say.
Prop 40 is about state funding, not national enrollment |
||
| 5 | |||
|
HubertManne
piefed.social
HubertManne@piefed.social Joined: 2025-03-13 |
I can think of exactly once when a Republican crossed the aisle to do something good. And he’s dead now.
yeah its a long shot before they realized they just needed an absolutely loyal core base of nuts and then they just need to bamboozle a good portion of the rest. I firmly believe a decade or two of losing would change them quite a bit if they survived. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
Pratai
piefed.ca
Pratai@piefed.ca Joined: 2026-02-12 |
Prop 40 is about state funding, not national enrollment
It’s not about funding. It’s about what qualifies you to be able to have it. If you’re unable to work the required hours, and aren’t in the list of exemptions- you get no insurance. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
Pratai
piefed.ca
Pratai@piefed.ca Joined: 2026-02-12 |
Yeah, I get that. But OP’s pitch of “we need to vote to stop this” is just wrong. We need to build a time machine to stop this. I think overselling what votes can actually do makes people less likely to vote.
Do you not know that laws can be overturned? It can be stopped. |
||
| -4 | |||
UnderpantsWeevil
lemmy.world
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-14 |
It’s not about funding. It’s about what qualifies you to be able to have it. If you’re unable to work the required hours, and aren’t in the list of exemptions- you get no insurance.
Increased state funding would allow California to extend benefits in excess of what the Feds allow. |
||
| 7 | |||
|
Pratai
piefed.ca
Pratai@piefed.ca Joined: 2026-02-12 |
It’s not about funding Increased state funding would allow California to extend benefits in excess of what the Feds allow.
It’s about qualifying man. You won’t qualify for it regardless of funding. |
||
| -3 | |||
UnderpantsWeevil
lemmy.world
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-14 |
It’s about qualifying man. You won’t qualify for it regardless of funding.
California can operate benefits in parallel |
||
| 6 | |||
Boomer Humor Doomergod
lemmy.world
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.worldJoined: 2024-03-15 |
Do you not know that laws can be overturned? It can be stopped.
Do you know what it takes to overturn a law? This cannot be stopped before it comes into force. |
||
| 5 | |||
NoneOfUrBusiness
fedia.io
NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.ioJoined: 2024-06-13 |
Do you not know that laws can be overturned? It can be stopped.
Presumably Trump would be able to veto that. |
||
| 3 | |||
|
Pratai
piefed.ca
Pratai@piefed.ca Joined: 2026-02-12 |
Do you know what it takes to overturn a law? This cannot be stopped before it comes into force.
But the moment it’s stopped, so too, does the millions of denials as a result. |
||
| -1 | |||
|
Pratai
piefed.ca
Pratai@piefed.ca Joined: 2026-02-12 |
California can operate benefits in parallel
QUALIFYING. Are you purposely ignoring this? They will be denied because they don’t qualify. Prop 40 has no say in this. It’s at the federal level. Call your insurance and ask them. |
||
| -4 | |||
Jake Farm
sopuli.xyz
Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyzJoined: 2023-04-20 |
I get that voting will elect a Congress that won’t do stupid shit like this. I already voted. But even if the Dems win most of the elections next week, what can they actually do to stop this? It’s been passed as a law, so ostensibly they’d need Trump’s signature on a bill they pass or 2/3 vote in both houses to overturn it. And even if they win tremendously outperform the polls they won’t have ...
And they are unwilling to charge him with treason, and spend the last few decades giving the president as much power as possible. |
||
| 1 | |||
Boomer Humor Doomergod
lemmy.world
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.worldJoined: 2024-03-15 |
But the moment it’s stopped, so too, does the millions of denials as a result.
Is that the case? Can Congress stop a law from coming into force without passing an additional law that requires the president or 2/3 majority? I’m asking because politics has stupid rules that don’t make sense and I hate it. And if it’s overturned later, can they back date those rejections so people don’t die from lack of coverage? Again: We need a time machine to fix this. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
lemonhead2
lemmy.world
lemonhead2@lemmy.world Joined: 2026-01-04 |
I think they've done the calculation. the people who vote are either healthy, have insurance, or have drunk the coolaid. they won't win votes with this. so why not make money ... 🙄 |
||
| 2 | |||
Boomer Humor Doomergod
lemmy.world
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.worldJoined: 2024-03-15 |
And they are unwilling to charge him with treason, and spend the last few decades giving the president as much power as possible.
They can charge him with treason all they want. Without 2/3 of the Senate they can’t do anything about it. And even then it’s questionable. |
||
| 3 | |||
|
Pratai
piefed.ca
Pratai@piefed.ca Joined: 2026-02-12 |
Is that the case? Can Congress stop a law from coming into force without passing an additional law that requires the president or 2/3 majority? I’m asking because politics has stupid rules that don’t make sense and I hate it. And if it’s overturned later, can they back date those rejections so people don’t die from lack of coverage? Again: We need a time machine to fix this.
Okay man… so do nothing. Enjoy the outcome. |
||
| -6 | |||
Boomer Humor Doomergod
lemmy.world
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.worldJoined: 2024-03-15 |
Okay man… so do nothing. Enjoy the outcome.
Bro I already voted. That will not stop this. Stop telling people it will. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
grue
lemmy.world
grue@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-13 |
Do you not know that laws can be overturned? It can be stopped.
"Overturning" is done by the judiciary. "Repealing" is what's done by the legislature. |
||
| 3 | |||
|
Pratai
piefed.ca
Pratai@piefed.ca Joined: 2026-02-12 |
"Overturning" is done by the judiciary. "Repealing" is what's done by the legislature.
No law is permanent. |
||
| -2 | |||
|
Pratai
piefed.ca
Pratai@piefed.ca Joined: 2026-02-12 |
Bro I already voted. That will not stop this. Stop telling people it will.
Believe whatever tucks you in at night. |
||
| -4 | |||
sinwell
infosec.pub
Septimaeus@infosec.pubJoined: 2023-07-09 |
I get that voting will elect a Congress that won’t do stupid shit like this. I already voted. But even if the Dems win most of the elections next week, what can they actually do to stop this? It’s been passed as a law, so ostensibly they’d need Trump’s signature on a bill they pass or 2/3 vote in both houses to overturn it. And even if they win tremendously outperform the polls they won’t have ...
Historically, there are a few potential levers available to a unified Congress that are immune/mostly-immune to veto: 1. Congressional Review Act (1996) can be used to override veto.This could delay implementation. It only applies to agency rules not statutes, however, and due to the 60-day window expiring in July, any further CRA resolutions would not gain the usual procedural protections (against filibuster, which in the Senate is essentially guaranteed). 2. Concurrent resolutions (i.e., from both house and senate) skip the president’s desk.These can be used broadly to make “clarifications” WRT legislative intent and could in theory be used to lessen the negative impact of the legislation by applying leverage against the ambiguities present in the original wording. This can’t be used to repeal HR1 entirely (the only reason H.Con.Res. 86 had immediate binding authority was due its use of an existing statutory carve out offered by the War Powers Resolution of 1973, for all the good it did) but it could be used to, for example, counteract the agency interpretation/guidelines to expand the bounds of exempted participants. 3. Attaching a repeal to any “must-pass” legislation.In particular, any appropriations-related bill offers use of “power of the purse” (by most accounts remains the strongest constitutional power available to Congress). This is likely the strongest lever available to a unified Congress to block implementation of presidential initiatives and force presidential signing of joint resolutions, since the presidency can’t perpetually block appropriations without shutting down the entire government. Edit: use spoilers for details |
||
| 6 | |||
|
Sludgeyy
lemmy.world
Sludgeyy@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-08-14 |
Sounds like we need a free educational program everyone can join. I wonder what the requirements for the program are Also what about self employed people? |
||
| 4 | |||
|
CainTheLongshot
lemmy.world
CainTheLongshot@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-05 |
Do you not know that laws can be overturned? It can be stopped.
Just to clarify, this law becomes active January 1st. The new congress doesn't get sworn in until January 3rd. As others have stated, it's being projected that Dems take back the House and possibly the Senate, which could see a new law get signed in that reappropriates funds back into social safety net programs, though it then goes to the dipshit in command for a signature. If he vetoes, it'll require 2/3rds of both chambers of Congress to override, which is a much taller order. So as you are stating, people need to realize what's fully at stake and vote. There is a pathway to some form of normalcy, 2/3rds is .... possible. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
Pratai
piefed.ca
Pratai@piefed.ca Joined: 2026-02-12 |
Just to clarify, this law becomes active January 1st. The new congress doesn't get sworn in until January 3rd. As others have stated, it's being projected that Dems take back the House and possibly the Senate, which could see a new law get signed in that reappropriates funds back into social safety net programs, though it then goes to the dipshit in command for a signature. If he vetoes, it'll ...
It can be overturned in 2028, and congress can delay bills. It happens all the time. |
||
| 0 | |||
|
im_fine_sandy
nord.pub
im_fine_sandy@nord.pub Joined: 2026-08-05 |
I get that voting will elect a Congress that won’t do stupid shit like this. I already voted. But even if the Dems win most of the elections next week, what can they actually do to stop this? It’s been passed as a law, so ostensibly they’d need Trump’s signature on a bill they pass or 2/3 vote in both houses to overturn it. And even if they win tremendously outperform the polls they won’t have ...
This. Classic too little too late. |
||
| 1 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |