| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » CryptoCurrency |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Sunflier
lemmy.world
Sunflier@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-03-27 |
So, I'm looking to upgrade some old at-home miners, and i saw this flu miner that just came out. It is marketed as highly efficient. https://fluminer.com/en/product_detail.aspx?cid=390&id=50 It's almost 3 grand for 6 GH/s, but it eats 1700w of power. I have a an avalon q, which eats 1800+ watts at high power and gets 90 TH/s. Isn't that better? I thought it went from kilo -> mega -> giga -> tera. So, what am I missing here? How is the flu more efficient? The fluminer is marketed as efficient, but if I am getting an order of magnitude less hashes for only 100 w savings, that doesn't seem efficient. I see that it uses the Scrypt algorithm, but does that really make that much of a difference than the SHA-256? I pool mine with the unmineable pool, so it would seem more hashes = more coin. |
||
| 1 Original | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |