| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
KokusnussRitter
discuss.tchncs.de
KokusnussRitter@discuss.tchncs.de Joined: 2024-04-16 |
|
||
| 90 Original | |||
ummthatguy
Moderator
ummthatguy@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-22 |
|
||
| 39 | |||
|
KokusnussRitter
discuss.tchncs.de
KokusnussRitter@discuss.tchncs.de Joined: 2024-04-16 |
Understood. |
||
| 15 | |||
|
schipelblorp
sh.itjust.works
schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2026-05-16 |
Do not look to hope, it has long forsaken these lands. Report back! |
||
| 7 | |||
gnufuu
lemmy.ca
gnufuu@lemmy.caJoined: 2026-06-10 |
spoilerMaggie shot Mr. Burns |
||
| 19 | |||
|
KokusnussRitter
discuss.tchncs.de
KokusnussRitter@discuss.tchncs.de Joined: 2024-04-16 |
Do not look to hope, it has long forsaken these lands. Report back!
Kokusnussritter to command. We have successfully carried out our first mission. Spirits are high. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
KokusnussRitter
discuss.tchncs.de
KokusnussRitter@discuss.tchncs.de Joined: 2024-04-16 |
::: spoiler spoiler Maggie shot Mr. Burns :::
I shall not give in to curiosity. |
||
| 11 | |||
Reygle
lemmy.world
Reygle@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-20 |
SNW? edit: Strange New Worlds I guess. Wow, I'm out of touch. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
KokusnussRitter
discuss.tchncs.de
KokusnussRitter@discuss.tchncs.de Joined: 2024-04-16 |
SNW? edit: Strange New Worlds I guess. Wow, I'm out of touch.
Strange new worlds |
||
| 3 | |||
Reygle
lemmy.world
Reygle@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-20 |
Strange new worlds
Yeah, apparently I'm brain damaged. ToS, TNG, DS9, and I didn't "get it" first time. Wow. |
||
| 3 | |||
|
KokusnussRitter
discuss.tchncs.de
KokusnussRitter@discuss.tchncs.de Joined: 2024-04-16 |
SNW? edit: Strange New Worlds I guess. Wow, I'm out of touch.
It felt odd shortening to SNW for me too xDD |
||
| 2 | |||
dohpaz42
lemmy.world
dohpaz42@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-07-01 |
I shall not give in to curiosity. I shall not give in to curiosity. I shall not give in to curiosity. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH I shall not give in to curiosity!
THEY SAID: spoilerMAGGIE SHOT MR. BURNS! |
||
| 9 | |||
|
KokusnussRitter
discuss.tchncs.de
KokusnussRitter@discuss.tchncs.de Joined: 2024-04-16 |
THEY SAID: ::: spoiler spoiler MAGGIE SHOT MR. BURNS! :::
<_< |
||
| 6 | |||
|
Niksolo80
lemmy.world
Niksolo80@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-02 |
Yeah, apparently I'm brain damaged. ToS, TNG, DS9, and I didn't "get it" first time. Wow.
Don’t forget Voy as well for short. |
||
| 6 | |||
Reygle
lemmy.world
Reygle@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-20 |
Don’t forget Voy as well for short.
Thanks I hate it |
||
| 6 | |||
ummthatguy
Moderator
ummthatguy@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-22 |
Thanks I hate it
And it's canon!
|
||
| 13 | |||
Reygle
lemmy.world
Reygle@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-20 |
|
||
| 7 | |||
Sanctus
anarchist.nexus
Sanctus@anarchist.nexusJoined: 2025-09-08 |
|
||
| 16 | |||
|
51dusty
lemmy.world
51dusty@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-04 |
why do folks in this community throw so much shade at SNW? I think it's pretty good and like how it mixes scifi, camp and character development. The show is not perfect but any stretch, but I feel it gets a ton of outlandish critiques. |
||
| 19 | |||
Sanctus
anarchist.nexus
Sanctus@anarchist.nexusJoined: 2025-09-08 |
why do folks in this community throw so much shade at SNW? I think it's pretty good and like how it mixes scifi, camp and character development. The show is not perfect but any stretch, but I feel it gets a ton of outlandish critiques.
SNW is amazing in the first season, pretty good second but I could see the plot loosening, and off the rails (derogatory) in S3. They didnt even bother to build towards my guy Pike's storyline it started on. Now, all that being said, SNW is still fun even if it goes no where and doesnt do half of what it could with the characters to instead focus on meta themed episodes about TV as a whole, I still like it and will watch it in the reruns. It definitely needed 6 or so seasons and it would've bloomed better. |
||
| 8 | |||
cobysev
lemmy.world
cobysev@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-15 |
<_<
I gave in to curiosity. It's not a SNW spoiler. However, if you don't want to be spoiled about a Simpsons episode from like 20+ years ago, don't click those spoilers. |
||
| 8 | |||
cobysev
lemmy.world
cobysev@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-15 |
SNW? edit: Strange New Worlds I guess. Wow, I'm out of touch.
I dunno why, but my first instinct was to read the acronym as "Star Trek New Worlds." Totally forgot the name of the show for a minute there. |
||
| 3 | |||
Schiffsmädchenjunge
sh.itjust.works
Shipgirlboy@sh.itjust.worksJoined: 2024-04-12 |
I gave in to curiosity. It's not a SNW spoiler. However, if you don't want to be spoiled about a Simpsons episode from like 20+ years ago, don't click those spoilers.
By now it's over 30 years.. |
||
| 10 | |||
cobysev
lemmy.world
cobysev@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-15 |
By now it's over 30 years..
|
||
| 14 | |||
Reygle
lemmy.world
Reygle@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-20 |
I dunno why, but my first instinct was to read the acronym as "Star Trek New Worlds." Totally forgot the name of the show for a minute there.
Welcome to the brain fart club for today |
||
| 2 | |||
|
TheAlbatross
lemmy.blahaj.zone
TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone Joined: 2023-09-12 |
why do folks in this community throw so much shade at SNW? I think it's pretty good and like how it mixes scifi, camp and character development. The show is not perfect but any stretch, but I feel it gets a ton of outlandish critiques.
Best of the newer live action Trek and its not even close |
||
| 4 | |||
|
L0rdMathias
sh.itjust.works
L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-08-15 |
I dunno why, but my first instinct was to read the acronym as "Star Trek New Worlds." Totally forgot the name of the show for a minute there.
I read it as "SAW" while scrolling past and then pulled an extremely hard double take. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
KokusnussRitter
discuss.tchncs.de
KokusnussRitter@discuss.tchncs.de Joined: 2024-04-16 |
I gave in to curiosity. It's not a SNW spoiler. However, if you don't want to be spoiled about a Simpsons episode from like 20+ years ago, don't click those spoilers.
AAAAAAAAAH! D: |
||
| 4 | |||
|
KokusnussRitter
discuss.tchncs.de
KokusnussRitter@discuss.tchncs.de Joined: 2024-04-16 |
Man, discussing the show under any other post I get, but this is uncool. Please let me enjoy [and experience] the show [by myself] |
||
| 0 | |||
|
kieron115
startrek.website
kieron115@startrek.website Joined: 2024-02-14 |
AAAAAAAAAH! D: MAGGIES GOT A GUN! WHY?
Because her dog's day has just begun. |
||
| 4 | |||
Mo.
lemmy.world
Poppa_Mo@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-07-02 |
The lean into gimmick episodes ruined it. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
milkisklim
lemmy.world
milkisklim@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-06-04 |
Don’t forget Voy as well for short.
Plus size hose old scientists |
||
| 2 | |||
Sanctus
anarchist.nexus
Sanctus@anarchist.nexusJoined: 2025-09-08 |
Man, discussing the show under any other post I get, but this is uncool. Please let me enjoy [and experience] the show [by myself]
If you actually read the whole chain I go on to say its not bad. But if what you are posting about is what you are looking for in a show you will be disappointed here. |
||
| 4 | |||
CyberEgg
discuss.tchncs.de
CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.deJoined: 2023-06-22 |
why do folks in this community throw so much shade at SNW? I think it's pretty good and like how it mixes scifi, camp and character development. The show is not perfect but any stretch, but I feel it gets a ton of outlandish critiques.
I can only speak for myself, but it had a great start and only declined in seasons 2 and three, with multiple outright problematic episodes in season 3 (that also just went against everything Star Trek represents in terms of values and philosophy, and while there occasionally were really troublesome episodes before (Code of Honor, anyone?), the density of those episodes in S3 was awfully high). Season 4 was slightly better again, but some issues seem to have become woven into the fabric of the show (why on earth are they trying to depict Spock so damn straight and take all the queerness out of him?), the amount of gimmick episodes was staggering and I do not believe they can reach the highs of S1 again. And when a show peaks in its first season, I find that pretty sad, tbh (even more so the longer a show runs). |
||
| 12 | |||
ripcord
lemmy.world
ripcord@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-06-10 |
Best of the newer live action Trek and its not even close
Super low bar though |
||
| 8 | |||
|
smeenz
lemmy.nz
smeenz@lemmy.nz Joined: 2023-07-11 |
*character |
||
| 6 | |||
|
Lushed_Lungfish
lemmy.ca
Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca Joined: 2025-02-14 |
It's not bad. I enjoy it. Low points are REALLY low though. But some of the gimmick episodes are really fun. It's actually hopeful. |
||
| 7 | |||
PrimeErective
startrek.website
PrimeErective@startrek.websiteJoined: 2023-08-25 |
SNW? edit: Strange New Worlds I guess. Wow, I'm out of touch.
South North West |
||
| 3 | |||
|
Obviouslywrong
lemmy.world
Obviouslywrong@lemmy.world Joined: 2026-10-21 |
SNW is amazing in the first season, pretty good second but I could see the plot loosening, and off the rails (derogatory) in S3. They didnt even bother to build towards my guy Pike's storyline it started on. Now, all that being said, SNW is still fun even if it goes no where and doesnt do half of what it could with the characters to instead focus on meta themed episodes about TV as a whole, I s...
I find plenty to like in 2 and 3 but 3 had a lot of very loud episodes with way too much screaming for no reason. |
||
| 2 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |