RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
Watching AI companies complain that their intellectual property is not being respected will never stop being hilarious
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ lemmy.ml yogthos@lemmy.ml
Joined: 2020-01-18
Quote

152   Original
Toneswirly beehaw.org Toneswirly@beehaw.org
Joined: 2025-11-19
#2 · Quote Reply

Fair use for me but not for thee.

4
skisnow lemmy.ca skisnow@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2025-03-22
#3 · Quote Reply

They keep saying “stolen” when their model hasn’t even been directly copied, just used to train another.

The other pathetic thing they’re doing is pushing the narrative that it’s being done for weapons and spying and shit, as though that’s exclusive to deepseek. Sadly at least a few of the useful idiots on my LinkedIn seem to be swallowing and regurgitating it.

6
Grimy lemmy.world Grimy@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-08-27
#4 · (edited) Quote Reply

Chinese models are dangerous

Chinese models are stealing through distillation

Chinese models don't pay for the copyrighted material (coming soon)

It almost feels like a pattern and the end game is banning anything that stops the monopoly they are trying to grow.

5
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ lemmy.ml yogthos@lemmy.ml
Joined: 2020-01-18
#5 · Quote Reply

Chinese models are dangerous Chinese models are stealing through distillation Chinese models don't pay for the copyrighted material (coming soon) It almost feels like a pattern and the end game is banning anything that stops the monopoly they are trying to grow.

I think that's precisely what they're trying to build a case for. They're going to argue that open source Chinese models must be banned because they stole their IP.

4
Post Reply
Back to top