| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » UK Politics |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Tenebris Nox
feddit.uk
tenebrisnox@feddit.ukJoined: 2023-06-12 |
Haven't they pulled this stunt before? |
||
| 11 Original | |||
|
phutatorius
lemmy.zip
phutatorius@lemmy.zip Joined: 2025-06-04 |
Sounds like there's a judge who needs sacking. |
||
| 7 | |||
blackn1ght
feddit.uk
blackn1ght@feddit.ukJoined: 2023-06-22 |
Sounds like there's a judge who needs sacking.
Reading the article, it sounds like the document they sent to the printing company had the legally required asset, but the printing company changed the font which caused it not to print. I'm assuming that they had someone from the printing company give evidence showing that it was their error and that the judge didn't just take Reforms lawyer for their word... I hope. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
mindlesscrollyparrot
discuss.tchncs.de
mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de Joined: 2023-12-28 |
Reading the article, it sounds like the document they sent to the printing company had the legally required asset, but the printing company changed the font which caused it not to print. I'm assuming that they had someone from the printing company give evidence showing that it was their error and that the judge didn't just take Reforms lawyer for their word... I hope.
Sure, because printing companies change the font after you proofed the document all the time. The article doesn't say what evidence the judge actually saw to support Reform's claim. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
mindlesscrollyparrot
discuss.tchncs.de
mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de Joined: 2023-12-28 |
Sure, because printing companies change the font after you proofed the document all the time. The article doesn't say what evidence the judge actually saw to support Reform's claim.
And we're supposed to believe that Goodwin's team checked it multiple times before printing, but didn't notice or care that the printed version had a different font? |
||
| 2 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |