| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index
» Technology
Page 1 of 3 Goto page 1, 2, 3 Next Last » |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Potato Lover 💾 No brain found
lemmy.sdf.org
user224@lemmy.sdf.orgJoined: 2023-06-17 |
|
||
| 550 Original | |||
|
9tr6gyp3
lemmy.world
9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-16 |
Holy. Shit. |
||
| 13 | |||
|
Darkcoffee
sh.itjust.works
Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2025-02-05 |
The UK government is so god damn dumb. |
||
| 205 | |||
Ulrich
feddit.org
Ulrich@feddit.orgJoined: 2024-12-22 |
Another reason sideloading is important. |
||
| 44 | |||
|
XLE
piefed.social
XLE@piefed.social Joined: 2025-06-23 Banned |
> can't have apps without an account Will this finally kill off the "Apple is private enough" mantra I always hear? |
||
| 65 | |||
|
Quicky
piefed.social
Quicky@piefed.social Joined: 2025-06-04 |
Mixed feelings about this. However, ethical questions aside, and from a purely legal conformation standpoint, if the phone validates the user is over 18 and passes only that info as a token to whatever application or website requests it, then it's a good implementation. It means elimination of multiple validation requirements, minimal transfer of data to third parties, fewer sources holding personal data, etc. Whether it works that way remains to be seen. |
||
| 50 | |||
|
nul9o9
lemmy.dbzer0.com
nul9o9@lemmy.dbzer0.com Joined: 2023-08-21 |
Disgusting. |
||
| 11 | |||
|
nul9o9
lemmy.dbzer0.com
nul9o9@lemmy.dbzer0.com Joined: 2023-08-21 |
Mixed feelings about this. However, ethical questions aside, and from a purely legal conformation standpoint, if the phone validates the user is over 18 and passes only that info as a token to whatever application or website requests it, then it's a good implementation. It means elimination of multiple validation requirements, minimal transfer of data to third parties, fewer sources holding per...
I haven't read this particular law. But one proposed in Colorado still requires service providers to look for other indicators of age and override the one reported by the OS. |
||
| 15 | |||
|
NullPointer
programming.dev
nullPointer@programming.dev Joined: 2023-07-10 |
> can't have apps without an account > cave have an account without a loicense Will this finally kill off the "Apple is private enough" mantra I always hear?
unfortunately, that is not how cults work. |
||
| 8 | |||
|
flandish
lemmy.world
flandish@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-04-08 |
if a phone is tied to a svc acct like a telco provider- age verification should be automatic as THAT provider cannot open an acct for a child. |
||
| 132 | |||
|
lIlIlIlIlIlIl
lemmy.world
lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-03-31 |
Another reason sideloading is important.
Sideloading isn’t a real term - there is only loading a better OS than whatever spy-tech google is offering. You can’t “sideload” hardware you own - you just install whatever software you like and prefer |
||
| 25 | |||
|
Doom
lemmy.world
Doom@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-09 |
if a phone is tied to a svc acct like a telco provider- age verification should be automatic as THAT provider cannot open an acct for a child.
FUCKING THANK YOU! |
||
| 51 | |||
|
Joined: 2023-09-14 |
What the actual fuck????????? |
||
| 11 | |||
Matty_r
programming.dev
Matty_r@programming.devJoined: 2023-09-23 |
Wow, thats fucked. I hope Australia doesn't decide to do this as well. This shit is happening so quickly at the moment |
||
| 55 | |||
Ulrich
feddit.org
Ulrich@feddit.orgJoined: 2024-12-22 |
Sideloading isn’t a real term - there is only loading a better OS than whatever spy-tech google is offering. You can’t “sideload” hardware you own - you just install whatever software you like and prefer
Jesus Tittyfucking Christ, yes it is. I'm not typing out "installing software from outside the Google Play Store" every time, so you can go away. |
||
| 23 | |||
|
d00ery
lemmy.world
d00ery@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-20 |
if a phone is tied to a svc acct like a telco provider- age verification should be automatic as THAT provider cannot open an acct for a child.
I'm not in favour of any of the age restriction stuff UK government is doing. Good argument, but: Phones in the UK can be bought without a contract and untied to any network. Pay as you go SIM cards can be bought without a contract. Credit cards used to make purchases online require users to be 18 or over. Debit cards on the other hand can be issued to those under 18 (but a bank account will require evidence of ID, address, age). |
||
| 18 | |||
|
awaysaway
sh.itjust.works
awaysaway@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2025-03-12 |
Wow, thats fucked. I hope Australia doesn't decide to do this as well. This shit is happening so quickly at the moment
me too but i'm not overly optimistic. i don't think there is a strong enough culture of anti-surveillance |
||
| 13 | |||
|
Optional
lemmy.world
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-07-09 |
|
||
| 48 | |||
|
flandish
lemmy.world
flandish@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-04-08 |
I'm not in favour of any of the age restriction stuff UK government is doing. Good argument, but: Phones in the UK can be bought without a contract and untied to any network. Pay as you go SIM cards can be bought without a contract. Credit cards used to make purchases online require users to be 18 or over. Debit cards on the other hand can be issued to those under 18 (but a bank account will re...
can a debit card be created by someone under 18? ie does a parent have to do it then give johnny a card? can a bodega owner sell a prepaid to a minor, and can prepaids be used? just wondering where up the chain the responsibility lies. i’m all for corps being held to task, but also parents. if i handed my kid a phone it was my responsibility. now he had phones that he acquired. i saw them. so i know it is largely irrelevant my thoughts on chain of concern. in short: this is a terrible tar pit of gov horseshit sold in the “protect the kids” camp but really is “build a bigger fascist state db…” |
||
| 11 | |||
|
StrawberryPigtails
lemmy.sdf.org
StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org Joined: 2023-10-18 |
Well, since I'm not doing that, that would prevent me from having to install the apps that every damned company seems to insist I install rather than having a website. Kinda makes me wish for this nonsense to come to the US. |
||
| 3 | |||
|
HertzDentalBar
lemmy.blahaj.zone
HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone Joined: 2024-12-26 |
Jesus Tittyfucking Christ, yes it is. I'm not typing out "installing software from outside the Google Play Store" every time, so you can go away.
You could go with something in between? Side loading is a loaded term created to insinuate we are doing something we shouldn't be doing. |
||
| 5 | |||
Rimu
piefed.social
rimu@piefed.socialJoined: 2024-01-04 |
2026, the year of the PWA. |
||
| 2 | |||
Ulrich
feddit.org
Ulrich@feddit.orgJoined: 2024-12-22 |
You could go with something in between? Side loading is a loaded term created to insinuate we are doing something we shouldn't be doing.
No it's not. Someone just made that up. |
||
| -1 | |||
☂️-
lemmy.ml
umbrella@lemmy.mlJoined: 2023-07-12 |
The UK government is so god damn dumb.
[deleted]
|
||
| 68 | |||
|
Arcane2077
sh.itjust.works
Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-06-22 |
No it's not. Someone just made that up.
Yes, Apple did. Before that, it was called downloading |
||
| 12 | |||
|
mrgoosmoos
lemmy.ca
mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca Joined: 2025-03-24 |
no problem, I'll just use apps from outside of the App Store, right? |
||
| 25 | |||
|
goferking (he/him)
lemmy.sdf.org
goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org Joined: 2023-08-03 |
2026, the year of the PWA.
|
||
| 4 | |||
|
0_o7
lemmy.dbzer0.com
0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com Joined: 2024-12-02 |
Mixed feelings about this. However, ethical questions aside, and from a purely legal conformation standpoint, if the phone validates the user is over 18 and passes only that info as a token to whatever application or website requests it, then it's a good implementation. It means elimination of multiple validation requirements, minimal transfer of data to third parties, fewer sources holding per...
It's always funny when Apple fanboys try to whitewash its brand. "Apple is the most private mobile operating system there is that cares for its users that stands up to governments" until it doesn't but that's still great because it is how it is and apple has to obey laws and its fine because they hide their involvement with feds so well with marketing, and the cult accepts whatever they do, so they get a pass. Have you tried not being a cult member to manufacture consent for corporations? That or PR agencies are picking up fediverse to push people into being docile consumers. |
||
| -11 | |||
|
Phoenixz
lemmy.ca
phoenixz@lemmy.ca Joined: 2023-06-10 |
This is what happens when your phone is no longer YOUR phone |
||
| 81 | |||
Ulrich
feddit.org
Ulrich@feddit.orgJoined: 2024-12-22 |
Yes, Apple did. Before that, it was called downloading
Once again, no they didn't. Literally just look it up. You have the knowledge of the world at your fingertips.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sideloading Had I said "downloading" it wouldn't have made much sense, would it? |
||
| 0 | |||
lepinkainen
lemmy.world
lepinkainen@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-11-26 |
This is what happens when your phone is no longer YOUR phone
[deleted]
|
||
| -47 | |||
|
plyth
feddit.org
plyth@feddit.org Joined: 2025-05-11 |
Teens can travel alone and setup their phone in France or Ireland, or buy their phone from a dealer. All the cool kids will have free phones and be on snapchat, forcing everybody else to follow suit. |
||
| 18 | |||
|
Arcane2077
sh.itjust.works
Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-06-22 |
Once again, no they didn't. Literally just look it up. You have the knowledge of the world at your fingertips. The term "sideload" was coined in the late 1990s by online storage service i-drive as an alternative means of transferring and storing computer files virtually instead of physically https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sideloading Had I said "downloading" it wouldn't have made much sense, would it?
Yep, and that definition was definitely what you meant lmfao. You’re obviously within spitting distance of the point, you basically spelled it out in your last sentence, just, I don’t know, reread your words slowly? |
||
| 2 | |||
|
chunes
lemmy.world
chunes@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-04-08 |
Once again, no they didn't. Literally just look it up. You have the knowledge of the world at your fingertips. The term "sideload" was coined in the late 1990s by online storage service i-drive as an alternative means of transferring and storing computer files virtually instead of physically https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sideloading Had I said "downloading" it wouldn't have made much sense, would it?
listen, I've been in technology since before i-drive existed and I've never heard of i-drive nor do I care about the vocabulary they used. The first time I ever heard the term sideloading was when these mobile stores started using it to make other options sound illegitimate. |
||
| 3 | |||
|
Scrollone
feddit.it
Scrollone@feddit.it Joined: 2023-06-03 |
no problem, I'll just use apps from outside of the App Store, right?
You could, if you lived in the EU :) |
||
| 24 | |||
|
Scrollone
feddit.it
Scrollone@feddit.it Joined: 2023-06-03 |
Sideloading isn’t a real term - there is only loading a better OS than whatever spy-tech google is offering. You can’t “sideload” hardware you own - you just install whatever software you like and prefer
Exactly. It's important that we stop saying "sideloading", we should just say "install directly" or some other non-loaded expressions |
||
| 2 | |||
|
hector
lemmy.today
hector@lemmy.today Joined: 2025-09-03 |
Wow, thats fucked. I hope Australia doesn't decide to do this as well. This shit is happening so quickly at the moment
I think they did this first, at least they passed the law first. Our "left center" government in action. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
ToTheGraveMyLove
sh.itjust.works
ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2026-01-29 |
[deleted]
Dude, apple IS the man |
||
| 30 | |||
|
Quicky
piefed.social
Quicky@piefed.social Joined: 2025-06-04 |
It's always funny when Apple fanboys try to whitewash its brand. "Apple is the most private mobile operating system there is that cares for its users that stands up to governments" until it doesn't but that's still great because it is how it is and apple has to obey laws and its fine because they hide their involvement with feds so well with marketing, and the cult accepts whatever they do, so ...
Not a single word in this rant has any relevance to my comment. |
||
| 10 | |||
|
Noja
sopuli.xyz
Noja@sopuli.xyz Joined: 2025-03-26 |
[deleted]
|
||
| 47 | |||
|
linule
lemmy.world
linule@lemmy.world Joined: 2026-01-20 |
Why is there no privacy respecting solution for age verification? Like the government giving you some sort of token that says you’re over 18 and that’s it? |
||
| 46 | |||
|
Nelots
piefed.zip
Nelots@piefed.zip Joined: 2025-07-09 |
It's always funny when Apple fanboys try to whitewash its brand. "Apple is the most private mobile operating system there is that cares for its users that stands up to governments" until it doesn't but that's still great because it is how it is and apple has to obey laws and its fine because they hide their involvement with feds so well with marketing, and the cult accepts whatever they do, so ...
Kinda just sounds like you were looking for an excuse to aggressively rant at someone. I don't know how you came away thinking they were an apple fanboy after reading that comment full of ifs and general skepticism. |
||
| 6 | |||
SorteKanin
feddit.dk
SorteKanin@feddit.dkJoined: 2023-04-27 |
Mixed feelings about this. However, ethical questions aside, and from a purely legal conformation standpoint, if the phone validates the user is over 18 and passes only that info as a token to whatever application or website requests it, then it's a good implementation. It means elimination of multiple validation requirements, minimal transfer of data to third parties, fewer sources holding per...
It's still stupid even if it's required by law. |
||
| 10 | |||
|
Quicky
piefed.social
Quicky@piefed.social Joined: 2025-06-04 |
purely legal conformation standpoint It's still stupid even if it's required by law.
The technical implementation, or the law itself? |
||
| 0 | |||
|
NotMyOldRedditName
lemmy.world
NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-08-24 |
Why is there no privacy respecting solution for age verification? Like the government giving you some sort of token that says you’re over 18 and that’s it?
Because its not about age verification, its about tracking and controlling you and making a privacy respecting solution isn't compatible with that. |
||
| 47 | |||
SorteKanin
feddit.dk
SorteKanin@feddit.dkJoined: 2023-04-27 |
The technical implementation, or the law itself?
Law itself |
||
| 7 | |||
|
Quicky
piefed.social
Quicky@piefed.social Joined: 2025-06-04 |
Law itself
Yeah, no doubt. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
Jimmytea
sh.itjust.works
Jimmytea@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2026-02-14 |
Why is there no privacy respecting solution for age verification? Like the government giving you some sort of token that says you’re over 18 and that’s it?
There is!, one of the officially recognised and approved ways is credit card verification, however afaik only steam is doing that. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
MrWildBunnycat
lemmy.world
MrWildBunnycat@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-13 |
[deleted]
Both |
||
| 14 | |||
|
Lazer365
feddit.nl
Lazer365@feddit.nl Joined: 2025-06-12 |
My Apple account is probably old enough to vote… |
||
| 37 | |||
|
boonhet
sopuli.xyz
boonhet@sopuli.xyz Joined: 2025-06-16 |
Why is there no privacy respecting solution for age verification? Like the government giving you some sort of token that says you’re over 18 and that’s it?
Because then you can share the token and everyone can use it I'm sure a more robust solution is possible though. |
||
| 4 | |||
| Post Reply |
Page 1 of 3
Goto page
1, 2, 3
Next
Last »
Back to top |