Why not champagne for all?

Because of limited resources, that’s unlikely to be possible

Best I can do is Coca Cola for like 50% of people.

Lmfao

Does anyone know of any legitimate criticisms of Sankara? Or even illegitimate ones that can be disproven? My exposure to him is fairly minimal, but everything ive heard about him is just over the top positive.

I'm not trying to cut down decolonizers either, but often criticisms are reflective of the material obstacles and struggles that a leader or movement faced. I'm sure there are some good histories out there and I would take any recommendations people have. But just given my own nature, ive found I can get into a particular history better by starting with the negative.

Religious intolerance?

Religion relies on hierarchies, he opposed hierarchies.

Had he survived, he would have had to struggle against counter-revolutionaries, resulting in similar allegations of authoritarianism that other AES leaders that do survive go through.

He was big into Ubuntu (the philosophy, not the distro) wasn't he? My limited understanding is that it goes hand in hand with liberation theology.

Thesis: Water

Antithesis: Champagne

Synthesis:

Ok, then I suppose they can have cake instead.

He (and his government) were accused of arresting political opponents, putting political opponents through show trials, requiring people to prove their innocence when on trial, not allowing defendants to be represented by counsel, and of issuing summary punishments to some groups of protestors.

In a brief search, I could confirm arresting political opponents (not speaking to whether there was cause), and denying defendants a lawyer (not illegal in Burkina Faso, just "against international standards").

Cirrhosis for all