h/t to Ed Zitron: https://bsky.app/profile/edzitron.com/post/3mfxqjqoias2q

This really is the dumbest timeline.

simulating battle scenarios

Regurgitating reddit armchair generals from /r/noncredibledefense

Incredibly ballsy move to keep using their tech after you literally branded them a supply chain threat and implied you would take legal action against them, but that’s this administration for ya

(they did say there would be a six-month phase out period after which if Anthropic still didn’t comply, they’d force them to, but still)

Maybe it has a bunch of leaked files from the WarThunder forums as well!

Simulating battle scenarios is absolutely hilarious, adults standing around the magic 8 ball

They want anthropic to drop the guardrails because they're literally using Claude for their strategic planning...

The US went to war with Iran because Pete Kegsbreath asked an LLM. Jesus fucking Christ.

this truly is the dumbest timeline huh

Wonder how hard it was to filter out the HOI4 results.

Military planners in Taiwan, SK and Japan are prob shitting bricks right now.

If they were talking about some complex simulation engine utilizing ML and research carefully collated and constructed, this would be at least interesting.

But they aren't. We shoved the entirety of text produced by the human race in a big pot, mixed it up, and extrude it by most likely connections. It is predictive of words and phrases, not of human behavior, physics of munitions, or anything actually useful for modeling warfare.

They're fucking generating war fanfic and using it to make stratgic decisions. Just hire Clancy, Crichton, Card, and/or whoever's ghost writing for them now. It'd be cheaper.

Bold of you to assume they would bother filtering them out.

Simulated battle scenarios are a common component of wargaming. That doesn't mean an LLM is the right tool for it, but it's been a thing for a long time.

The bigger concern here is using it for intelligence assessments and target acquisition, because LLMs hallucinate a lot.

Yeah, the fact that the nation's highest military command no longer understands the difference between machine learning and an LLM is gravely concerning...

They fired all the professionals in 2025. All that's left are the sycophants.

as a side effect, it's a phenomenal accountability sink. people almost forget that usaf can make entirely human-made fuckups https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amiriyah_shelter_bombing

That's fair, I only meant it to poke fun at the LLM simulating battle scenarios, I know it's useful in general to simulate and wargame

Yeah, an LLM is not designed for those kinds of simulations. It can write you a choose-your-own adventure story, but it can't realistically model dynamic kinetic operations with any degree of applicability.

Yeah, now when your autonomous weapon systems target your own fighter jets, no one gets court martialled!

Don't forget that time we leveled a clearly-marked hospital that we were in radio contact with the entire time.

@wonderingwanderer @fullsquare TBF, fighter jets should have been unmanned drones

What about the time the US carpet bombed an entire company of Canadian soldiers in iraq?

So thats why we bombed a school.

TBF, fighter jets should have been unmanned drones

On the one hand, an autonomous fighter jet would be immune to G-LOC, letting them perform maneuvers that would incapacitate/kill a human pilot. On the other hand, air-to-air combat is a complex affair, and the enemy will be probing for any weaknesses in your drones' programming to exploit.

Autonomous bombers seem easier to pull off - bombing missions are (relatively) straightforward compared to air-to-air combat.