| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » dullbananas highlights |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
dullbananas (joseph silva)
lemmy.ca
dullbananas@lemmy.caJoined: 2023-06-27 |
|
||
| 23 Original | |||
|
SanctimoniousApe
lemmings.world
SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world Joined: 2024-08-17 |
WtAF?!? So many questions, starting with WtF makes this "feminine?" |
||
| 4 | |||
FiniteBanjo
feddit.online
FiniteBanjo@feddit.onlineJoined: 2025-12-23 |
WtAF?!? So many questions, starting with WtF makes this "feminine?"
It definitely didn't come off as particularly masculine. |
||
| 4 | |||
FiniteBanjo
feddit.online
FiniteBanjo@feddit.onlineJoined: 2025-12-23 |
As much as that doesn't sound very efficient, I admit having a single core would prevent so many multithreading related bugs or crashes. Sounds nice. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
SpaceNoodle
lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-14 |
As much as that doesn't sound very efficient, I admit having a single core would prevent so many multithreading related bugs or crashes. Sounds nice.
A single core can still run multiple threads ... |
||
| 8 | |||
Pogogunner
sopuli.xyz
Pogogunner@sopuli.xyzJoined: 2024-01-02 |
As soon as I saw no networking, I knew TempleOS was coming |
||
| 6 | |||
FiniteBanjo
feddit.online
FiniteBanjo@feddit.onlineJoined: 2025-12-23 |
A single core can still run multiple threads ...
Why would it? Everything still processes one at a time anyways... |
||
| 1 | |||
ThotDragon
lemmy.blahaj.zone
thoughtfuldragon@lemmy.blahaj.zoneJoined: 2024-04-24 |
WtAF?!? So many questions, starting with WtF makes this "feminine?"
The act itself is not feminine but when felt by a sufficiently feminine person the urge to do so, is. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
SpaceNoodle
lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-14 |
Why would it? Everything still processes one at a time anyways...
So multiple things can effectively run at once. Otherwise, every piece of software has to be fully aware of every other piece's timing and resource requirements, which obviously can spiral out of control very quickly, and effectively locks out any possibility of an unplanned-for application running on the system. |
||
| 2 | |||
FiniteBanjo
feddit.online
FiniteBanjo@feddit.onlineJoined: 2025-12-23 |
So multiple things can effectively run at once. Otherwise, every piece of software has to be fully aware of every other piece's timing and resource requirements, which obviously can spiral out of control very quickly, and effectively locks out any possibility of an unplanned-for application running on the system.
I feel like even without multithreading the services share processing power effectively. There might be some jitters and hangs, but doing things within specification won't produce any noticeable lag. It's kind of like the difference of if one process ran for 3ms or if it ran for 0.3ms 10 times. But we're getting off topic, now, yes multithreading is apparently (a very stupid) thing on single cores and therefor the bugs and crashes can still occur. |
||
| 0 | |||
|
Pommes_für_dein_Balg
feddit.org
mech@feddit.org Joined: 2025-10-06 |
Gender ALL THE THINGS! |
||
| 2 | |||
|
SpaceNoodle
lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-14 |
I feel like even without multithreading the services share processing power effectively. There might be some jitters and hangs, but doing things within specification won't produce any noticeable lag. It's kind of like the difference of if one process ran for 3ms or if it ran for 0.3ms 10 times. But we're getting off topic, now, yes multithreading is apparently (a very stupid) thing on single co...
Well, I guess it's a good thing you're not a software engineer. |
||
| 1 | |||
FiniteBanjo
feddit.online
FiniteBanjo@feddit.onlineJoined: 2025-12-23 |
Well, I guess it's a good thing you're not a software engineer.
Developers aren't engineers as far as I'm concerned. |
||
| 0 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |