| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » LongformIndepth |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
BilSabab
lemmy.world
BilSabab@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-19 |
|
||
| 3 Original | |||
Paragone
lemmy.world
Paragone@lemmy.worldJoined: 2023-12-06 |
History, repeating itself, here: "there is NO SUCH THING AS A BLACK SWAN!!" Right.. THIS AI may never be conscious, but to pretend that it UNIVERSALLY ISN'T POSSIBLE, as the title declares, is intellectual-incompetence. Universal-declarations are, when careless, idiotic. _ /\ _ |
||
| 1 | |||
|
Sergio
piefed.social
Sergio@piefed.social Joined: 2025-08-01 |
History, repeating itself, here: "there is NO SUCH THING AS A BLACK SWAN!!" Right.. THIS AI may never be conscious, but to pretend that it UNIVERSALLY ISN'T POSSIBLE, as the title declares, is intellectual-incompetence. Universal-declarations are, when careless, idiotic. _ /\ _
It's an article in "Wired" about a new book by a guy best known for writing about food. Of course it's going to be clickbait. However, I give the Wired staff credit for using stock photos rather than GenAI. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
BilSabab
Moderator
BilSabab@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-19 |
History, repeating itself, here: "there is NO SUCH THING AS A BLACK SWAN!!" Right.. THIS AI may never be conscious, but to pretend that it UNIVERSALLY ISN'T POSSIBLE, as the title declares, is intellectual-incompetence. Universal-declarations are, when careless, idiotic. _ /\ _
hypesters gotta hype, eh? AI Doomerism is fun to bash. The article speculates upon phenomenology that isn't even technically present in the subject by definition so it is more of rhetoric exercise than credible argument because if we stick strictly to science research then we will end up arguing about definitions of "artificial", "intelligence" and "consciousness" and their explicit realization as technological solutions before getting the topic itself. |
||
| 2 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |