RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
NASA Cancels Artemis III's Crewed Landing
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
davel lemmy.ml davel@lemmy.ml
Joined: 2023-07-08
Quote

Last week, NASA announced that its Artemis II mission will be pushed to April at the earliest, due to issues with its helium tanks. Now, it's broken the news that the Artemis III follow-up mission will totally cancel its original goal of landing astronauts on the Moon.

Instead, Artemis III—now scheduled to take place in 2027—will be another crewed flight without a landing phase, followed by Artemis IV, a crewed lander mission, hopefully in 2028.

22   Original
Alas Poor Erinaceus lemmy.ml zdhzm2pgp@lemmy.ml
Joined: 2024-12-18
#2 · Quote Reply

I'm actually kind of glad to hear this because I was worried about the safety of the astronauts . . .

3
Novis lemdro.id Novis@lemdro.id
Joined: 2026-01-27
#3 · Quote Reply

Happy that they're being cautious with all this. Don't want any more deaths on NASA's watch. But this is also pretty humiliating. I also feel for those astronauts cause they were probably REALLY looking forward to the trip.

7
davel lemmy.ml davel@lemmy.ml
Joined: 2023-07-08
#4 · Quote Reply

Happy that they're being cautious with all this. Don't want any more deaths on NASA's watch. But this is also pretty humiliating. I also feel for those astronauts cause they were probably REALLY looking forward to the trip.

Indeed. I’m glad they didn’t let their dick measuring w/r/t China get the better of them.

4
TheAsianDonKnots lemmy.zip TheAsianDonKnots@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-10-03
#5 · Quote Reply

I can’t believe NASA stuck with LH2 propellant. That shit can sneak out of anything, including metal tanks. Same reason your birthday ballon is inflated but on the floor after a few days, the helium scadoodled and left the O2 behind.

Oh sure, LH2 has more lifting power but SpaceX launches 10x as many ships with their methaLOX engines. Even Saturn V ran on LOX in the 60’s.

At what point is it a sunk cost and NASA builds a more reliable fuel system? These delays can’t be cheap or productive.

1
your_good_buddy lemmy.world your_good_buddy@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-03
#6 · Quote Reply

Really drives home just how much of an effort and achievement the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo programs were back in the 1960s.

6
Post Reply
Back to top