| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » Fuck AI |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Arthur Besse
lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.mlJoined: 2022-01-17 |
for those not familiar with Mark Pilgrim, he is/was a prolific author, blogger, and hacker who abruptly disappeared from the internet in 2011. cross-posted from: https://lemmy.bestiver.se/post/968527 |
||
| 94 Original | |||
|
theunknownmuncher
lemmy.world
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world Joined: 2024-06-13 Banned |
US courts have already ruled that AI generated works cannot be copyrighted, so yeah, if you vibecode something, it is not yours to license. |
||
| 39 | |||
|
hendrik
palaver.p3x.de
hendrik@palaver.p3x.de Joined: 2021-08-21 |
US courts have already ruled that AI generated works cannot be copyrighted, so yeah, if you vibecode something, it is not yours to license.
Yeah. Relicensing it to MIT is really weird. Should either be Public Domain, or LGPL 😁 |
||
| 7 | |||
|
TootGuitar
sh.itjust.works
TootGuitar@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2024-04-28 |
Yeah. Relicensing it to MIT is really weird. Should either be Public Domain, or LGPL 😁
It can’t be public domain by definition. The original work was licensed, and its license (LGPL) requires derivative works to be licensed as LGPL. There is no other choice. |
||
| 17 | |||
|
hendrik
palaver.p3x.de
hendrik@palaver.p3x.de Joined: 2021-08-21 |
It can’t be public domain by definition. The original work was licensed, and its license (LGPL) requires derivative works to be licensed as LGPL. There is no other choice.
Yes. I just followed their argument to the logical conclusion, if it were true. Which it probably isn't. |
||
| 2 | |||
|
Grimy
lemmy.world
Grimy@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-08-27 |
Seems kind of fair. Codings has always been a bit of a wild west, are we going to start copyrighting concepts? The original repo wasn't used during the rewrite either. I also prefer MIT to copy left in any case and I don't even think reverse engineering something and rewriting it is bad either. I don't dig the constant copyright bootlicking. |
||
| -8 | |||
flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)
feddit.uk
flamingos@feddit.ukJoined: 2023-06-12 |
Trust the Flask guy to be in favour of this. |
||
| 5 | |||
|
dogs0n
sh.itjust.works
dogs0n@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-07-08 |
I think we may be mixing two different questions here. The legal question is not whether an AI model might have seen the original code during training. The relevant question is whether the new implementation contains protected expression from the LGPL codebase. At the moment, the available evidence points the other way: reported similarity is extremely low (~0.04% average / ~1.29% max) module s...
If you truly enjoy free software and the right to modify, then you enjoy copy left. MIT is how you have your work "stolen" by people who hate freedoms and want to lock everything down. I really think everyone using copyleft licenses is the correct future. Licensing with MIT has become very popular, but I don't think it should be. |
||
| 4 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |