RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
Remember NFTs
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
SpaceCowboy lemmy.ca SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-06-17
#52 · Quote Reply

Is that Lauren Chen, the Russian agent?

3
Hikermick lemmy.world Hikermick@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-23
#53 · Quote Reply

TIL: NFT's are/were the modern equipment of beanie babies

1
UnderpantsWeevil lemmy.world UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-14
#54 · Quote Reply

Terrible investment. That was probably like 2 months of his income.

Or it wasn't. Very possible he was simply gifted the NFT and lied about the price.

A bunch of the early 20s NFT sales were wash sales

8
ɔiƚoxɘup infosec.pub Quexotic@infosec.pub
Joined: 2023-08-23
#55 · Quote Reply

Odd, I always thought they were a means to launder your money.

17
lemmydividebyzero reddthat.com lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com
Joined: 2024-08-28
#56 · Quote Reply

But the Metaverse!!!!

3
F_State midwest.social F_State@midwest.social
Joined: 2025-09-24
#57 · Quote Reply

$155 looks a little high to be honest.

The very idea of NFTs were wild. You don't own a physical image, you own something kind of like a copyright to an image but you don't in fact own the actual copyright. But it's gonna cost you alot of money and somehow make you even more money someday.

21
Test_Tickles lemmy.world Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-04
#58 · Quote Reply

TIL: NFT's are/were the modern equipment of beanie babies

Beanie babies were a thing, a real physical thing. You could hand one to a child and they could play with it for years, or you could use it as a weapon and knock one of your siblings unconscious. But it was a thing. Nfts are a digital link to something. They are not even the thing that they link to.

8
TastyWheat lemmy.world TastyWheat@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-01
#59 · Quote Reply

Wouldn't even pay for his jaw repairs these days

3
ayyy sh.itjust.works ayyy@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2024-06-20
#60 · Quote Reply

Isn't it worth exactly what the highest bidder will pay? Where would the $155 number come from? Seems like an NFT famously owned by Logan Paul would sell for more than $155 anyway. Not saying he'd make a profit here...

No, literally nobody cares so nobody’s going to pay.

2
Tollana1234567 lemmy.today Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
Joined: 2025-06-04
#61 · Quote Reply

the Pauls so thier grift was dying "targeting children for views" so they pivoted to maga.

2
merc sh.itjust.works merc@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-06-09
#62 · Quote Reply

Or... He either didn't actually pay that money... Or the money went to someone or something he wanted to give 635,000 dollars to already, and writing it off on his taxes is an additional side benefit.

Or aliens descended from space and messed with everybody's minds so we all think that he's a real person.

C'mon, stick to reality.

0
anonklay lemmy.world anonklay@lemmy.world
Joined: 2026-02-16
#63 · Quote Reply

The point here is say you are in business with X party but it's illegal. X party can buy an nft worth nothing or generate one. You buy the NFT for the amount of your bill with X party. You've now technically not paid them for whatever illegal thing, instead you bought an nft from them. You could also break this down into multiple NFTs, buying 100 $100 NFTs from various "owners" that don't link ...

Thank you! Now for the first time, i finally see the slightest sense in NFTs. I really didn't get it from the start. I heard various explanations and they never made any sense to me. Left me confused every time until now.

Its just a mask for a deal in the background. Ok now i get it.

5
Valmond lemmy.dbzer0.com Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2025-11-13
#64 · Quote Reply

It's like a tax on stupidity.

10
khánh lemmy.zip khanh@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2026-01-20
#65 · Quote Reply

Can confirm, I took one look at NFTs back in 2021 and immediately said "that's fucking stupid."

13
Magnum, P.I. infosec.pub Magnum@infosec.pub
Joined: 2025-12-31
#66 · Quote Reply

No, literally nobody cares so nobody’s going to pay.

Believe me, there's a guy out there willing to pay $250

3
Magnum, P.I. infosec.pub Magnum@infosec.pub
Joined: 2025-12-31
#67 · Quote Reply

Terrible investment. That was probably like 2 months of his income.

His annual income is estimated at around $20 Million, so it was probably less.

Also you can write realized losses off of your taxes.

1
moobythegoldensock infosec.pub moobythegoldensock@infosec.pub
Joined: 2025-06-08
#68 · Quote Reply

Thank you! Now for the first time, i finally see the slightest sense in NFTs. I really didn't get it from the start. I heard various explanations and they never made any sense to me. Left me confused every time until now. Its just a mask for a deal in the background. Ok now i get it.

Yep.

My buddy once went to a farmer’s market where they weren’t allowed to sell beer, but they were allowed to give it away. So he did the oldest trick in the book: scooped up a bunch of rocks in a box, put up a sign that said “Rocks $5,” and “Free beer with purchase of rock.”

NFTs are just the rock.

10
pinball_wizard lemmy.zip pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-02-13
#69 · Quote Reply

"Today it is worth $155."

LMAO. No.

22
prime_number_314159 lemmy.world prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-11-19
#70 · Quote Reply

If it was easy to buy, I would pay $5 for this thing, so I could tell the three people in my life that would be amused by my owning it. That's the floor on the market, for this particular one - so it still has a long way to fall.

5
lad programming.dev sukhmel@programming.dev
Joined: 2023-07-03
#71 · Quote Reply

Cash only exists for money laundering and illicit transfers and scamming

Also tax evasion

2
LH0ezVT sh.itjust.works LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2024-06-23
#72 · Quote Reply

$155 looks a little high to be honest. The very idea of NFTs were wild. You don't own a physical image, you own something kind of like a copyright to an image but you don't in fact own the actual copyright. But it's gonna cost you alot of money and somehow make you even more money someday.

You own a sign with a link to the image.

10
Jakeroxs sh.itjust.works Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-07-03
#73 · Quote Reply

I'm very sure it's the same kind of shit with the retro game ratings https://youtu.be/rvLFEh7V18A

2
uienia lemmy.world uienia@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-08-15
#74 · Quote Reply

For Logan Paul, yes, he wanted it to go up. But if this painting was laundering at work, the important part is that the seller can point to this transaction as "real". The IRS or the FBI might be looking into his sudden gains of half a million dollars, but when they do, they find that he sold Logan Paul half a million dollars of art. The NFT part makes it incredibly easy to generate said art. B...

It is also important to mention that you don't actually own any art with NFTs. You own a link pointing to the art, but the art itself is not owned by the owner of the NFT.

2
Raiderkev lemmy.world Raiderkev@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-01
#75 · Quote Reply

I used to think Bitcoin was a ponzi scheme. I still do, dut I used to, too

16
Wilco lemmy.zip Wilco@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-06-30
#76 · Quote Reply

"Today it is worth $155." LMAO. No.

Yea ... I agree, it really REALLY isn't worth $155.

13
prenatal_confusion feddit.org prenatal_confusion@feddit.org
Joined: 2024-09-04
#77 · Quote Reply

Believe me, there's a guy out there willing to pay $250

Hurr-durrrr!

(Said the guy)

0
zarkanian sh.itjust.works zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2024-01-11
#78 · Quote Reply

You own a sign with a link to the image.

And there isn't even a guarantee that link will work in perpetuity.

10
Khanzarate lemmy.world Khanzarate@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-04
#79 · Quote Reply

It is also important to mention that you don't actually own any art with NFTs. You own a link pointing to the art, but the art itself is not owned by the owner of the NFT.

I don't think that's actually all that important. It's fundamental to an understanding of NFTs, but not their role in any sort of money-laundering, since you can also just make NFTs using some AI-generated art or make 5000 NFT's from one low-effort art you do own.

All money laundering needs is the non-fungible part, which is easy to do, just stamp the corner with a limited-edition numbering mark and the 500 fungible digital tokens of a single art become 500 nonfungible tokens.

2
MithranArkanere lemmy.world MithranArkanere@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-02-01
#80 · Quote Reply

That scam exists because of all the deregulation. With proper regulation all the people pushing NFTs would have had to pay back all they stole.

5
Bytemeister lemmy.world Bytemeister@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-29
#81 · (edited) Quote Reply

Or aliens descended from space and messed with everybody's minds so we all think that he's a real person. C'mon, stick to reality.

I guess it's possible... But I'd consider the fraudster who famously committed financial frauds, participating in more financial fraud, to be a much more probable scenario.

2
sveltecider lemmy.ca sveltecider@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2026-03-01
#82 · Quote Reply

I somehow....didn't fall for these?

11
merc sh.itjust.works merc@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-06-09
#83 · Quote Reply

I guess it's possible... But I'd consider the fraudster who famously committed financial frauds, participating in more financial fraud, to be a much more probable scenario.

Just accept the reality that dumb people make dumb "investments".

0
MyVeryRealName lemmy.world MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world
Joined: 2026-02-23
#84 · Quote Reply

That scam exists because of all the deregulation. With proper regulation all the people pushing NFTs would have had to pay back all they stole.

Really?

1
mapache programming.dev mapache@programming.dev
Joined: 2024-02-25
#85 · Quote Reply

I bought for the first time a few NFTs this year. Basically that was the only way for me to buy FIFA WC26 tickets in the FIFA blockchain.

2
Heikki2 lemmy.world Heikki2@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-07-02
#86 · Quote Reply

Id probably have bought it as a sticker for 0.50 or a dollar when I was 10

5
Jackhammer_Joe lemmy.world Jackhammer_Joe@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-26
#87 · Quote Reply

I bought for the first time a few NFTs this year. Basically that was the only way for me to buy FIFA WC26 tickets in the FIFA blockchain.

Humble brag.

But I wouldn't support the football-loving corrupt FIFA and the United Divided States with their fascist president dictator, no matter how much I like soccer football

6
Jackhammer_Joe lemmy.world Jackhammer_Joe@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-26
#88 · Quote Reply

I somehow....didn't fall for these?

Who with a clear mind and IQ above 0 would fall for that? Seriously!?

In Germany, we have a great saying for such stupid people: “As dumb as a five-meter (~5.5 yard) dirt road.”

10
RAFAELRAMIREZ lemmy.world RAFAELRAMIREZ@lemmy.world
Joined: 2026-02-03
#89 · Quote Reply

Trends often look obvious in hindsight. What’s interesting is how every cycle teaches people something new about hype, risk, and timing.

1
eestileib lemmy.blahaj.zone eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Joined: 2023-07-02
#90 · Quote Reply

Who with a clear mind and IQ above 0 would fall for that? Seriously!? In Germany, we have a great saying for such stupid people: “As dumb as a five-meter (~5.5 yard) dirt road.”

"that's a driveway!"

1
Sunflier lemmy.world Sunflier@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-03-27
#91 · Quote Reply

A fool and their money are soon parted.

1
Tattorack lemmy.world Tattorack@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-10-28
#92 · Quote Reply

Get fucked.

We had this ruining the art world right before AI started taking its shot.

NFTs died miserably.

Now it's AI's turn.

15
Tattorack lemmy.world Tattorack@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-10-28
#93 · Quote Reply

Trends often look obvious in hindsight. What’s interesting is how every cycle teaches people something new about hype, risk, and timing.

But this looked obvious the moment it popped up. At no point did I ever think this was a good idea.

3
Bytemeister lemmy.world Bytemeister@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-29
#94 · Quote Reply

Just accept the reality that dumb people make dumb "investments".

Sure, and accept that this guy has a few million dollars and can afford to pay for some "creative" accounting.

2
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In lemmy.world Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-18
#95 · Quote Reply

If it was easy to buy, I would pay $5 for this thing, so I could tell the three people in my life that would be amused by my owning it. That's the floor on the market, for this particular one - so it still has a long way to fall.

I'll make you one of these for $5.

3
Final Remix lemmy.world FinalRemix@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-01
#96 · Quote Reply

It's like a tax on stupidity.

It's all just money laundering-plus-a-scam.

1
FlexibleToast lemmy.world FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-03
#97 · Quote Reply

Like a lot of the art world, I'm pretty sure these were mainly used for money laundering.

1
BilSabab lemmy.world BilSabab@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-19
#98 · Quote Reply

i fucking loved NFT startups in 2021. it was the definition of easy money. I had like 20 clients like that in 2021 alone and it was the shit. the funniest bit is that literally none of these companies or projects were around by the time 2023 started - all wiped out and most of these entrepreneur bros just moved on to do disposable AI startups instead with equally nothingburger results. what's baffling is that these motherfuckers still manage to raise investments for some bullshit pie in the sky but actual techies with ideas struggle to get a quarter worth of financing even though their ideas actually have legs

14
merc sh.itjust.works merc@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-06-09
#99 · Quote Reply

Sure, and accept that this guy has a few million dollars and can afford to pay for some "creative" accounting.

Which still means he lost more than half a million dollars from a bad investment.

0
Bytemeister lemmy.world Bytemeister@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-29
#100 · Quote Reply

Which still means he lost more than half a million dollars from a bad investment.

Clearly, you didn't bother to read the other comments in this very thread before you posted this.

1
merc sh.itjust.works merc@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-06-09
#101 · Quote Reply

Clearly, you didn't bother to read the other comments in this very thread before you posted this.

Clearly, you have an agenda and simply think that someone as dumb as Logan Paul couldn't simply have made a dumb choice. You need to come up with some kind of conspiracy theory where he did it to benefit.

1
Post Reply Page 2 of 3   Goto page « First 1, 2, 3 Last »
Back to top