RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
Social media ban for kids under consideration in online harms bill: Carney
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
Cows Look Like Maps sh.itjust.works CowsLookLikeMaps@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-06-20
Quote

100   Original
supersquirrel sopuli.xyz supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
Joined: 2023-12-09
#2 · Quote Reply

Stupid as fuck

20
HikingVet lemmy.ca HikingVet@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-11-01
#3 · Quote Reply

As someone who was a teenager when the internet became a thing, I agree there should be a debate on the topic. Because as I see it, our brains got broken differently after the internet.

There is a healthy way to approach this. There is a minimum age for social media. Buuuut.... I'm not the one who should be saying what that is.

37
kbal fedia.io kbal@fedia.io
Joined: 2023-11-03
#4 · (edited) Quote Reply

Oh great it's time for that again. So many things they might try to do to protect the children. So few of them that would not do more harm than good.

Please let this government fall before they fuck it up too badly, and the same to its successor. Delay is all we can do, and hope we can hold them off long enough for the utter stupidity of "age verification" systems to become obvious to even the politicians as its failure in e.g. the UK continues to play out.

20
Jhex lemmy.world Jhex@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-01-28
#5 · Quote Reply

As someone who was a teenager when the internet became a thing, I agree there should be a debate on the topic. Because as I see it, our brains got broken differently after the internet. There is a healthy way to approach this. There is a minimum age for social media. Buuuut.... I'm not the one who should be saying what that is.

the problem here is that all politicians are reallty after is "age verification" which is just an excuse to deannonymize the intenet and track everyone

69
T00l_shed lemmy.world T00l_shed@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-27
#6 · Quote Reply

the problem here is that all politicians are reallty after is "age verification" which is just an excuse to deannonymize the intenet and track everyone

That's exactly it. It has nothing to do with protecting children, it's sole purpose is to get rid of any semblance of privacy

40
No_Maines_Land lemmy.ca No_Maines_Land@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2026-02-01
#7 · Quote Reply

The minimum age for social media should be 105..

Change my mind.

-1
snoons lemmy.ca snoons@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-06-16
#8 · Quote Reply

Even if they somehow implement this in an anonymous way (let's be real, it's the government), it would have to be through government services and a lot of people that use social media, specifically Indigenous people, well, let's just say, do not trust the government. So, if this is implemented in a mature, reasonable way without any involvement from the private sector; you are still excluding a significant portion of the populace just by having the government involved.

This should never have even been brought up. It's idiotic.

5
SatansMaggotyCumFart piefed.world SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world
Joined: 2025-07-09
#9 · Quote Reply

The minimum age for social media should be 105.. Change my mind.

Seeing how you posted this thought on social media how old are you?

5
discomatic lemmy.ca discomatic@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-07-04
#10 · Quote Reply

I'm still confused as to how this has anything to do with the population at large. Monitor your fucking kids.

24
J3N5T4R thelemmy.club J3N5T4R@thelemmy.club
Joined: 2026-02-12
#11 · Quote Reply

That's exactly it. It has nothing to do with protecting children, it's sole purpose is to get rid of any semblance of privacy

It's also to de-platform an silence them.

16
yeehaw lemmy.ca cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-08-09
#12 · Quote Reply

While I agree kids should not have Facebook or IG, I don't really think it's up to the government to decide. Parent your kids.

12
T00l_shed lemmy.world T00l_shed@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-27
#13 · (edited) Quote Reply

It's also to de-platform an silence them.

For sure, I think that is more akin secondary consideration in their eyes, however.

3
Sailor Anarres lemmy.dbzer0.com theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2024-08-22
#14 · Quote Reply

Really hate the way the internet is moving and the increasing control governments are enforcing and reaching for.

19
Disgruntled lemmy.ca Disgruntled@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-06-18
#15 · Quote Reply

Does this mean going back to a BBS and FidoNet?

4
TheDoctorDonna piefed.ca TheDoctorDonna@piefed.ca
Joined: 2026-02-06
#16 · Quote Reply

As a millenial I grew up on the internet and I watched my own children navigate an ever evolving internet, especially social media. My home did not allow social media before 16 as I agree there is an age limit. The problem is how do we verify this? Requiring ID for anything on the internet is a slippery slope that politicians seem all too happy to throw us down.

7
pedz lemmy.ca pedz@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-08-07
#17 · Quote Reply

So, mass surveillance for everyone under the guise of "think of the children!" while billionaires are trafficking and raping them.

18
ILikeBoobies lemmy.ca ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-08-14
#18 · Quote Reply

Good but unenforceable.

2
CanadaPlus lemmy.sdf.org CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
Joined: 2023-06-12
#19 · Quote Reply

Good but unenforceable.

Maybe? It won't stop them all, but the network effect also works in reverse - one teen leaves, and it's less attractive to their friends. Hmm, I should check the latest from Australia.

4
Reannlegge lemmy.ca Reannlegge@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2025-02-13
#20 · Quote Reply

Really hate the way the internet is moving and the increasing control governments are enforcing and reaching for.

Why I am moving to Mastodon (sorta I don’t use it much), Lemmy (yes I know it is part of Mastodon), I want to move to peertube but that is a hard thing at least that is how I am finding it. My computers are raspberry pis so I do not use MacOS or Windows, sadly I still use an iPad and iPhone as I do not have the money to change them yet. I hide as much about myself from the ad market with piholes and single use email addresses with my own domain. I have a VPN back to my LAN so that when I am away I still get all the ad blocking. I realize that this is blocking the ad market and not the government, but I am going to make it as hard as possible for governments to check me and my internet habits out as hard as possible.

2
skeptomatic lemmy.ca skeptomatic@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-12-26
#21 · Quote Reply

It's also to de-platform an silence them.

Uh yeah...
That's what all parents want. 😆

1
Tigeroovy lemmy.ca Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2025-04-16
#22 · Quote Reply

I'm still confused as to how this has anything to do with the population at large. Monitor your fucking kids.

Seriously, just be an actual parent to your children and let adults be able to enjoy things without everything being censored to shit because you use the internet as a babysitter.

3
No_Maines_Land lemmy.ca No_Maines_Land@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2026-02-01
#23 · Quote Reply

Seeing how you posted this thought on social media how old are you?

I'm definitely under 105.

I'm aware of the cognitive dissidence, but I can still believe social media should be banned (or at least banned in most of it's current forms) while still using it.

I am also reliant on a personal automobile while simultaneously believing people should not have to be reliant on personal automobiles.

3
jaselle lemmy.ca jaselle@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2025-08-29
#24 · Quote Reply

Age verification not mentioned. Wake me up when it is.

4
Avid Amoeba lemmy.ca avidamoeba@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-07-05
#25 · Quote Reply

As a millenial I grew up on the internet and I watched my own children navigate an ever evolving internet, especially social media. My home did not allow social media before 16 as I agree there is an age limit. The problem is how do we verify this? Requiring ID for anything on the internet is a slippery slope that politicians seem all too happy to throw us down.

We set the standard for parents and other adults and institutions like we do for tobacco. That makes it easier for adults to enforce the ban. It's much easier to enforce no social rule when it's illegal than when it isn't.

1
BrilliantantTurd4361 sh.itjust.works BrilliantantTurd4361@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2025-03-10
#26 · Quote Reply

I'm still confused as to how this has anything to do with the population at large. Monitor your fucking kids.

Stop preying on kids you degenerate pedos

1
ShaggySnacks lemmy.myserv.one ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
Joined: 2023-08-17
#27 · Quote Reply

Weird at how we’re not talking about the technology behind social media aka algorithms that are provoke a specific emotion. Since it’s those algorithms that is hurting children and society.

5
maplesaga lemmy.world maplesaga@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-11-30
#28 · (edited) Quote Reply

Weird at how we’re not talking about the technology behind social media aka algorithms that are provoke a specific emotion. Since it’s those algorithms that is hurting children and society.

Its definitely not the unmitigated housing shortage, the dramatic rise in food prices, the dramatic drop in healthcare access, double digit youth unemployment after mass immigration and LMIA scams.

Its just social media making the youth upset, they dont realize their lives are great.

1
maplesaga lemmy.world maplesaga@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-11-30
#29 · Quote Reply

Age verification not mentioned. Wake me up when it is.

I wonder how its all being coordinated, is it large tech companies pushing it I assume?

1
jaselle lemmy.ca jaselle@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2025-08-29
#30 · Quote Reply

I wonder how its all being coordinated, is it large tech companies pushing it I assume?

I doubt it, big tech doesn't really benefit from this as far as I know. I think it's based on public outrage.

1
sveltecider lemmy.ca sveltecider@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2026-03-01
#31 · Quote Reply

I'm still confused as to how this has anything to do with the population at large. Monitor your fucking kids.

“Monitor your kids” hasn’t really been good enough and now we are seeing literal cognitive decline due to social media use in youth. I agree that global age verification is a privacy violation, but there ARE genuine problems with unrestricted social media use for youth.

2
discomatic lemmy.ca discomatic@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-07-04
#32 · Quote Reply

“Monitor your kids” hasn’t really been good enough and now we are seeing literal cognitive decline due to social media use in youth. I agree that global age verification is a privacy violation, but there ARE genuine problems with unrestricted social media use for youth.

Websites who can't handle the data without getting hacked should not be asking for my government ID.

2
GalacticSushi piefed.blahaj.zone GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone
Joined: 2026-02-04
#33 · Quote Reply

I'm still confused as to how this has anything to do with the population at large. Monitor your fucking kids.

"Protect the kids" is just the current excuse to erode privacy and implement further government surveillance measures. If this was truly about protecting children they'd be regulating social media companies to stop them from being so harmful in the first place.

4
Post Reply
Back to top