| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » Film Photography |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
gerryflap
feddit.nl
gerryflap@feddit.nlJoined: 2023-08-08 |
My second attempt with Harman Phoenix 200, this time I metered most shots around 125 or 100 iso, which worked quite a bit better. Though I still had more under than overexposed shots. Also, I'm very much a telelens person. This was another instance of me forcing myself to shoot with the wide-angle prime. I would've loved to see the 50mm version of this shot |
||
| 26 Original | |||
gerryflap
feddit.nl
gerryflap@feddit.nlJoined: 2023-08-08 |
Oh, according to my notes this was shot at f/5.6 and 1/250th. I also had one at 1/1000th, which is what I actually metered it at as far as I can remember. While that shot has more detail in the highlights, most of the image is underexposed. Phoenix (1) really is a difficult film to satisfy, curious to see how Phoenix II changes things |
||
| 2 | |||
|
jwiggler
sh.itjust.works
jwiggler@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-06-18 |
Oh, according to my notes this was shot at f/5.6 and 1/250th. I also had one at 1/1000th, which is what I actually metered it at as far as I can remember. While that shot has more detail in the highlights, most of the image is underexposed. Phoenix (1) really is a difficult film to satisfy, curious to see how Phoenix II changes things
what kinda meter are you using? I feel like f5.6 1/250 seems maybe ~2 stops slow for the shadows. Although the buildings might've been lost in the light at say f4 1/125. Do you know if harmon Phoenix likes being underexposed or overexposed? |
||
| 1 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |