| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » Europe |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
geneva_convenience
lemmy.ml
geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlJoined: 2024-01-25 |
Beef and lamb receive 580 times more in EU subsidies than legumes, a report has found, despite scientists urging people to get more of their protein from less harmful sources. Analysis by the charity Foodrise found the EU’s common agricultural policy (CAP) provides “unfair” levels of support to meat-heavy diets that doctors consider unhealthy and climate scientists consider environmentally destructive. It found beef and lamb were subsidised 580 times more than legumes in 2020, while pork was subsidised nearly 240 times more. Dairy, meanwhile, received 554 times more in subsidies than nuts and seeds. |
||
| 52 Original | |||
|
ChicoSuave
lemmy.world
ChicoSuave@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-08-12 |
Cause beef and lamb are delicious. Seems clear. Need tastier legumes. |
||
| -6 | |||
HiddenLayer555
lemmy.ml
HiddenLayer555@lemmy.mlJoined: 2024-09-13 |
Cause beef and lamb are delicious. Seems clear. Need tastier legumes.
See, this is what all the carnist arguments come down to. Shamelessly willing to sacrifice animal lives, the climate, and by extension the future of your own species on this planet for your tastebuds, and don't anyone dare criticize you on it otherwise they're the problem. |
||
| 9 | |||
HiddenLayer555
lemmy.ml
HiddenLayer555@lemmy.mlJoined: 2024-09-13 |
"The hippies preaching veganism are classist because vegan food is expensive!" |
||
| 7 | |||
|
PowerCrazy
lemmy.ml
PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml Joined: 2023-06-23 |
I have no issue subsidizing food. It shouldn't be a race to the bottom. Different food has different costs and that's ok. |
||
| -3 | |||
|
Mangoholic
lemmy.ml
Mangoholic@lemmy.ml Joined: 2023-06-24 |
Sure sounds like a lot when you say 580 times more, but if the legumes had close to 0.01% subsidiaries 5% is already 500 times more. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
ThirdConsul
lemmy.zip
ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip Joined: 2026-01-03 |
Ehh... Let's talk iron. Iron absorption rate for humans is up to 1% for legumes and up to 30% for read meat. To meet recommended daily iron intake you'd have to either eat ~2kg of beans or ~200-300g of red meat (or ~75g of liver). Iron deficiency rate in Europe is 5-10% (in older studies 4%-30%). Its similar in the USA. Worldwide is 25%. The article sounds like it was paid for by iron supplement companies. |
||
| -3 | |||
mathemachristian[he]
lemmy.ml
mathemachristian@lemmy.mlJoined: 2024-04-08 |
Ehh... Let's talk iron. Iron absorption rate for humans is up to 1% for legumes and up to 30% for read meat. To meet recommended daily iron intake you'd have to either eat ~2kg of beans or ~200-300g of red meat (or ~75g of liver). Iron deficiency rate in Europe is 5-10% (in older studies 4%-30%). Its similar in the USA. Worldwide is 25%. The article sounds like it was paid for by iron supplemen...
Lol I'm gonna bet all of this is wrong |
||
| 3 | |||
mathemachristian[he]
lemmy.ml
mathemachristian@lemmy.mlJoined: 2024-04-08 |
Cause beef and lamb are delicious. Seems clear. Need tastier legumes.
Treatbrained |
||
| 2 | |||
|
osanna
thebrainbin.org
osanna@thebrainbin.org Joined: 2026-02-01 |
See, this is what all the carnist arguments come down to. Shamelessly willing to sacrifice animal lives, the climate, and by extension the future of your own species on this planet for your tastebuds, and don't anyone dare criticize you on it otherwise they're the problem.
pretty much. they’re like toddlers. immediate satisfaction, the planet and the animals be damned |
||
| 3 | |||
|
dukepontus
sh.itjust.works
dukepontus@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2023-08-10 |
Ehh... Let's talk iron. Iron absorption rate for humans is up to 1% for legumes and up to 30% for read meat. To meet recommended daily iron intake you'd have to either eat ~2kg of beans or ~200-300g of red meat (or ~75g of liver). Iron deficiency rate in Europe is 5-10% (in older studies 4%-30%). Its similar in the USA. Worldwide is 25%. The article sounds like it was paid for by iron supplemen...
Sounds like this was written by the meat lobby. |
||
| 7 | |||
Seefra 1
lemmy.zip
sefra1@lemmy.zipJoined: 2025-06-24 |
Ehh... Let's talk iron. Iron absorption rate for humans is up to 1% for legumes and up to 30% for read meat. To meet recommended daily iron intake you'd have to either eat ~2kg of beans or ~200-300g of red meat (or ~75g of liver). Iron deficiency rate in Europe is 5-10% (in older studies 4%-30%). Its similar in the USA. Worldwide is 25%. The article sounds like it was paid for by iron supplemen...
Oh yes, because we all know more people suffer from iron deficiency than uric acid excess, obesity increased risk of cancer and other well known illments that come from excessive meat consumption. It literally says in the article that people eat too much meat which is unhealthy. |
||
| 3 | |||
|
ThirdConsul
lemmy.zip
ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip Joined: 2026-01-03 |
Lol I'm gonna bet all of this is wrong
Like literally wanna bet me? How much? How will you pay when you lose? |
||
| 1 | |||
|
ThirdConsul
lemmy.zip
ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip Joined: 2026-01-03 |
Oh yes, because we all know more people suffer from iron deficiency than uric acid excess, obesity increased risk of cancer and other well known illments that come from excessive meat consumption. It literally says in the article that people eat too much meat which is unhealthy.
Latest studies say sugar is the root of that evil. And there's plenty of veggies that cause it, and of course seafood.
Sugar and UPF (which may or may not contain meat)
It's magnitudes less likely than iron deficiency. And some studies attribute increased risk of cancer to UPF (which may or may not contain meat) rather than meat protein. Except one study that I know of that found esophagus cancer be correlated to non heme iron consumption significantly above the recommend dosage.
Agreed. |
||
| 2 | |||
geneva_convenience
Moderator
geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlJoined: 2024-01-25 |
Sounds like this was written by the meat lobby.
580% well spent |
||
| 2 | |||
mathemachristian[he]
lemmy.ml
mathemachristian@lemmy.mlJoined: 2024-04-08 |
Like literally wanna bet me? How much? How will you pay when you lose?
Yeah, alright, I'm gonna bet 1 jpg. I'll just DM you the jpg should I lose. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
ThirdConsul
lemmy.zip
ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip Joined: 2026-01-03 |
Yeah, alright, I'm gonna bet 1 jpg. I'll just DM you the jpg should I lose.
I'll take it. Iron absorption in legumes is ~1%, example study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6741854/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2405457717304941 From meat it's ~30% https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8305097/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12252460/ (interestingly this study reports higher legumes iron absorption rate) Iron in beans per 100g is 2mg-4mg Source: https://www.swbh.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Iron-in-your-diet-ML3395.pdf At 1% absorption rate you need 1kg to absorb 2mg-4mg. You need 2kg to be in 4mg-8mg iron absorbed range. Adults recommended iron intake is 8mg-18mg Source: Iron in red meat per 100g is 2-5mg Source: At 30% absorption rate its ~300g of meat to achieve 8mg. QED. (Oh, and btw - most iron in the meat is non-heme, which means from plant origin. Veggies have a lot of iron, humans just don't absorb it very well without intermediary usage of an animal) |
||
| 2 | |||
|
FatVegan
leminal.space
FatVegan@leminal.space Joined: 2025-11-05 |
Cause beef and lamb are delicious. Seems clear. Need tastier legumes.
Maybe humans are delicious too. Especially the young ones |
||
| 2 | |||
|
ChicoSuave
lemmy.world
ChicoSuave@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-08-12 |
Maybe humans are delicious too. Especially the young ones
Could be. If they are too tasty they get subsidized. |
||
| 1 | |||
mathemachristian[he]
lemmy.ml
mathemachristian@lemmy.mlJoined: 2024-04-08 |
I'll take it. Iron absorption in legumes is ~1%, example study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6741854/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2405457717304941 From meat it's ~30% https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8305097/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12252460/ (interestingly this study reports higher legumes iron absorption rate) Iron in beans per 100g is 2m...
I haven't forgotten about this, but couldn't get around to it yet. I'll assume that your DM is not about this post? |
||
| 1 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |