RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
Search Categories Forum list Register Log in
About RetroFed
RetroFed

Welcome to the nostalgia-filled piefed instance of yesteryear.

Open Registration with Application questionnaire.

If you have a question or comment you can post in !meta@retrofed.com or message @DosDude@retrofed.com or @Die4Ever@retrofed.com

In case of downtime and/or emergency, we will post updates on @DosDude@mastodon.social

Some rules we try to uphold:

  • Be civil. Bigotry is not welcome. This includes (but is not limited to): transphobia, queerphobia, racism, ageism and ableism. We do not promote hate.
  • Communities need to be Retro or Retro-adjacent.
  • Please don't upload pornographic content. (use an external image host for that)
73 registered users
Administrators: DosDude, Die4Ever
Visit retrofed.com
Nearly three-quarters of England’s woods inaccessible to public, study finds
Post Reply RetroFed Forum Forum Index » World News
AuthorMessage
veggibles lemmy.wtf veggibles@lemmy.wtf
Joined: 2024-10-19
Quote

Link: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/mar/13/nearly-three-quarters-of-englands-woods-inaccessible-to-public-study-finds
13   Original
frongt lemmy.zip frongt@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-07-31
#2 · Quote Reply

That's not necessarily a bad thing. Some areas should be reserved for nature, with minimal human impact. But it sounds like a lot of these areas aren't actual forest, they're tree farms.

We really need to be restricting human settlement expansion, too. Population is always going up, and these people need places to live, but we should be building up, not out.
2
Post Reply
Back to top
Powered by PieFed · PieBB frontend · All times are Europe/Amsterdam