What a title….. what do I eat now?!

what do I eat now?!

Fiber.

Specifically leafy greens and legumes.

Same answer it's always been.

Eat a bunch of that, even if you don't want to. And then you can literally eat all you want of anything else. You just won't want to eat much of anything else, because it takes forever to digest legumes and leafy greens.

The "problem" is that stuff is cheap as fuck and there's no way for anyone to make any money off telling people to do that

Plain canned tuna

Aren't oats supposed to be pretty good too? Although they are fairly high in carbs. Far cheaper than legumes, can get a kg of dry oats for about £0.50 while a similar amount of chickpeas is around 4 times that price.

Problem is if I simmer some oats in water and a pinch of salt then add some fruit my partner says it isn't a proper dinner.

What is wrong with peanuts? And yeah so expensive. Also high energy density means I find it easy to eat far too many kcal when snacking on cashews.

high-quality, plant-based foods, low in animal products

[...]

plant-based sources of proteins and fats were associated with about a 15% lower risk of CHD

Yeah, leafy greens and legumes are good because there's a bunch of extra vitamins.

Oatmeal (especially fortified) has a bunch of other stuff tho.

Like, don't literally only eat a few things. Anything high in fiber keeps you full for a long time.

Especially for the dudes, eating fiber is a very easy preventative measure for colo-rectal cancer. And it's hard to look at the correlation between modern low fiber high processed food diets and the skyrocketing rates of colo-rectal cancer and say there's zero correlation.

But convincing people to eat fiber gets a weird amount of opposition

My eyes are bad and I read that cats are pretty good. And I surmised that they are high in carbs. because of what the mice they caught had eaten.

vegetables

Talk about word salad. Pun intended. A better title might have been something like “Low-carb and low-fat diets associated with lower heart disease risk in certain cases” and let the reader figure it out.

All meat or all vegetables, nothing in between

I have a cup of green lentils for breakfast and another one for lunch. Huge fan.

I usually get rolled oats. Not sure if oatmeal is an American thing, I don't think it's common here? I have never heard of it anyway.

Here you usually get plain rolled oats or ultra processed instant porridge in various forms of packaging.

Ahh, that makes more sense

How long does your 1 lentil for lunch keep you full for?

Delicious mercury

The tuna in EVOO you buy at the supermarket here is lame. If you look at the ingredients it's just cheap vegetable oil with a dash of EVOO, and you can bet it's not the good EVOO.

Are you joking?

How do you prep this?

I really, really struggle to decide what to eat. I think it's a neurodivergence thing. I've often wished there was some bullshit soylent kind of thing I could consume instead of food.

Turn your eyes off and back on again to perform a factory reset

I mean yeah, but most people will find a low-carb low-fat diet to be very unfulfilling and even depressing in a fairly short period of time.

I suspect most people could easily do it for a week or so with the right support, but as a long term health intervention I'd say 1 in 100 people can adhere to this kind of regime.

Oats are very much a thing in the US. Quite common. Stores sell rolled oats, steel cut oats and sugary packaged oats. The trick is buying the rolled/steel cut and not the packaged sugar garbage.

Oats are almost pure carbs.

Legumes aren’t low carb no one can afford to eat enough leafy greens to meet their caloric intake for the day

Do you think it's normal to eat one item exclusively all day every day?

You're not gonna trick me out of an early death via heart attack.

I agree - it was a terrible suggestion…

this is ours:

you're right, it's bullshit marketing and it sucks. The front of the tin does say "tuna in olive oil blend", in fairness. All the other brands are the same / similar.

If it was real, pure olive oil it would cost more.

I just buy the stuff packed in spring water, drain it, and pour olive oil over it.

More like low carb and high fat diet (good fats like olive oil, nuts and fatty fish) are associated with lower heart disease plus it reverses type 2 diabetes in some, but they will figure it out, eventually. Yeah, my wife and I are living proof.
A side note: About half the population, depending on their ancestry, does quit well on a higher carb diet,

I wish bachelor chow from Futurama was real

Yeah, there's a lot to good EVOO.

Here i wouldnt really trust anything I can get from the supermarket, and certainly not anything imported.

The health benefits diminish significantly over time.

So the "best before" date might be 2 years, but if you want the health benefits then every month counts. Also the time spent in contact with air.

General reminder that nutrition 'science' is mostly paid for by corporations (see "sugar is better than fat") and the whole Ancel Keys 'Seven Countries Study' (cherry picked from 20+ countries) debacle and needs very careful handling.

If you want to get useful information on nutrition, I recommend immediately disregarding anything from Harvard, do your own research, but I've found it significantly corrupt and biased towards the second largest US export (AgTech) after guns.

FWIW this comes from the perspective of someone trained in hard science (Phys/Math) who then did advanced (published) work in BioInformatics (learning the complexities of Bio) and then looked at nutrition, what a shitshow !

"oatmeal" just refers to the prepared/cooked oats, whether that's from steel cut/rolled whole oats or processed and flavored in a packet

High-quality plant-based foods.

Are you seriously saying you know better than the scientist who did extensive research based on your anecdotal evidence with n=2?

The title is very misleading. This study is saying that it does not matter if you do a low-carb or low-fat diet, it matters what the quality of the food is. Basically eat more plant-based high-quality food and less refined carbohydrates and animal fat. So go ahead and sprinkle olive oil on everything if it makes you happy.

There are meal replacement shakes.

Anson Keys

Ancel Keys

Thanks,

It says 'low in' not 'absent'.

Like the gold star recommendation is 9-11 servings of fruits and vegetables daily. After which there's no significant health advantage to consuming more plants.

Being an omnivore is the tits. Animal foods are super nutrient dense, so you really don't need a whole lot, anyways.

People tend to love my cooking, but if there's one complaint I get (fairly often) it's "needs more meat."(I'm in USA) IMO, plates should look like a garden, full of colors and diversity, and obviously plant-forward.

I'd suggest something like ~1 lb of veggies (several servings) to ~.25 lb (single-serving) of meat. That's my ideal ratio, anyways. If you follow that guideline for every meal you'll easily get 12 servings of vegetables and about three servings of high-quality meat protein.

And fatty fish is a really big deal. Try to get at least a couple servings a week. ALA doesn't meaningfully convert into DHA nor EPA... I like canned salmon (or sardines, mackerel, herring, etc) for this. Also the occasional offal is excellent, the liver being 'nature's multivitamin.'

And save bones for stocks. All that cartilage and collagen and marrow and glucosamine and chondroitin and calcium and so many nutrients and minerals in the bones! And of course you need a bunch of carrots and celery and onions and garlic and potatoes to go with the stock! Maybe some lentils or whatever.

I keep trying but somehow always end up with highly salted or suugar coated garbage.

I have lots of biases in the area the paper is talking about. I've acquired the actual paper and on first pass they don't define what low carb means... really, they don't, anywhere... including the supplemental material. Making best effort inferences on how they make the category cohorts, it seems 40% of energy from carbs is the cutoff. 40% of a 1800 calorie diet is about 200g of carbs per day.

Currently my smells on this paper

• Who : Harvard nutrition, a org with a history of heavy plant based bias
• What they said : PBF beats ABF in a 200g "low carb" diet using intermediate health metrics
• On the basis of what : Epidemiology, on food frequency questionaries, using major assume corrective factors
• In what context : 200g/day carb diet, not controlling for processed foods (so healthy user bias the unprocessed abf group isn't represented at all)... they explicitly say this paper doesn't apply to keto "evidence from our study regarding the LCD and LFD patterns cannot be directly generalized to diets with much lower carbohydrates or fats intake, such as the ketogenic diet."

The bias is really evident in that they defined healthy and unhealthy LCD in terms of animal products... that is presupposing the outcomes in their healthy fat ranking system!

When I have more time I'll do a full post on this paper after I've had time to read it and figure out what the actual data is. I'm gobsmacked a paper on low carb doesn't even define what % of carbs is low carb explicitly... why make that so indirect and hidden!?!??!!

The good news is harvard is finally acknowledging the tsunami of low carb and keto research in their own way, but they are going to do it kicking and screaming on the pbf hill the entire time... but progress is progress.

Cool, I'll look out for the full review. Jeebus 200g/40% is 'low carb', not unexpected, but it's like they don't even try.

They are trying really hard to do something

It's weird, when the keto and carnivore papers get published they are always open access... but this paper... closed... and doesn't define their categories... it's curious. If i wasn't a charitable man I make think that was intentional.

I mean, that exact same criticism applies to every diet. Caloric restriction, intermittent fastin, pescaterianism/vegetarianism/veganism, etc.

There are 3 options:

1. Eat to live, rather than love to eat. Treat nutrition as a utility and not entertainment.

2. Learn to enjoy healthy eating. Not just the mouth feel and taste, but appreciating how much better you feel for the ~21 hours of the day you don't spend eating.

3. Eat all the terrible things. Enjoy the taste and mouth feel. Laugh, and grow fat.

But convincing people to eat fiber gets a weird amount of opposition

I haven't seen much. It's usually when it comes in the form of vegan evangelism and moralising. "Eat a balanced diet which include meat and veggies" is about as milquetoast a message as you can get with very little opposition. In fact, the new U.S. food pyramid is exactly that. Reception has been very good. It's not perfect, but it's a hell of a lot better than the old one.