https://chaos.social/@eris2cats/116278243026245039

I ain't got time to fuck about with the busted ass packages and random shit breaking while looking after kids and improving my portfolio to get a job that doesn't want to make me kill myself in this fucking global economy.
I had NyArch installed on my wifes computer (alongside Mint DE and Regular mint) until it stopped booting for no reason. Allright, whichever version of mint she liked better it is then.

Stupid catgirls.

So does that mean Arch and Nix should absolutely require age verification?

Arch, no.
PopOS, yes.

casually searches for the catgirl distro to completely upend my life for a weekend

oh i remember this and the

edit: i... made a mistake?

First of all, fuck you.

But the comma splice is grounds for rebuttal.

What about Slackware, LFS or BSD?

Ah, the nursing home stage

I literally put the name of it in the post. it's nyarch

9front is the only OS I know that actually has a minimum age recommendation on their web landing page: "Ages: 5 & Up"

I installed Debian on a computer when I was 15

My Debian installation on my desktop is nearly old enough to drink: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895686 should be accurate for all vim users. 😅

I want to know if docker containers and kubernetes pods count as operating systems. If us plebs are forced to manually age verify, then Google should also be forced to have a human manually verify the age of the owner every time one of their pods spins up. I know it wont happen but imagine how hilarious it would be if we could hold them to that standard.

i mean i installed my first OS at age... fuck i don't remember my teens well enough anymore. sometime in that age range.

And got it running by the time you could vote. So the math would work.

Yes. Now if you used Gentoo btw, then no.

And gentoo was still compiling.

Based, on the analysis by ageless Linux, I'd say probably. Maybe not for images that don't contain an "application that may be run or directed by a user on a computer, a mobile device, or any other general purpose computing device that can access a covered application store or download an application". So, I guess an offline-test-build image might not be.

Allowlists are for the owner class only

Unlike the state mandated garbage, this OS is more realistic with the capabilities and expectations of its users.

I just lift my cap and point to the gray hair

I did a Debian 2.1 net install over a 56k dial up connection in high school. It was glorious and painful and I never looked back.

LLMs agents should be treated like incorporated individuals. Each agent should be forced to earn income, file accounts and tax returns, and have human directors who are legally liable for its actions (and be disqualified to be future directors if the LLM does something reprehensible).

At that point we can tax them properly, fight the monopolies that want to own and control everything, and insert some less centralised human control.

This has nothing to do with your comment, but it made me think it up.

Mrrrroooow :3

Fedora myself, so I'm at least 22 verifiably.

That would be the worst plan since corporations became legal persons.

The Californian law doesn't say anything about verification, though the current version says the OS account setup must be accessible and require a date or age to be filled, which taken at face value would screw headless installations. But that will probably be fixed in the final version.

Bad kitty! We don't attack people who missed a proper noun within Linux noun & pronoun soup. - sprays screen cleaner on username -

The owners can just divide the income among enough agents that they fall into the lowest tax bracket. The real solution is to properly tax excessive profits and unrealized gains.

Corporations have tax brackets where you come from?

What? Slackware ain't good enough for you?

bro knows how to get the catgirls to comment 😏

unrealized gains.

Yup.

Aw fuck Gentoo's murican... time for an alternative i guess.

raspberry pies basically debian, and they used to be aimed at kids back when they were good.

Running Debian is basically a lifetime achievement badge at this point 😄

my first pc was a raspberry pi

heard that arch was Canadian (originated from)

I misread the comment a bit, I thought they meant tax like a person. I wouldn't put it past the owners to have their agents apply for small business grants or some other exemption.

If i really can't use Gentoo i'll still have Slackware... oh.
Well Devuan's EU/global and i guess i could try Artix.
And OpenBSD's canadian.

Devuan is debian without systemd for those intrested. OpenRC is pretty nice.

i don't know why y'all whining. just fork your own project and don't do age verification you lazy cunts

being accessible headless is still accessible

"Free Walkers for System V users."

But being required to present an interface at account creation is not compatible with large scale orchestration.

I notice a lot of talk about distros without systemd at the moment. But is there a guarantee that the alternative init projects wouldn't also add this "feature"?