RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
If you had any doubts that Know-Your-Customer laws were evil, here is one very good reason: personal data of 1 BILLION people just leaked.
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
herseycokguzelolacak lemmy.ml herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml
Joined: 2025-06-17
Quote

96   Original
hoshikarakitaridia lemmy.world hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-31
#2 · Quote Reply

This is genuinely grim

7
mina86 lemmy.wtf mina86@lemmy.wtf
Joined: 2025-03-13
#3 · (edited) Quote Reply

[deleted]
-14
herseycokguzelolacak lemmy.ml herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml
Joined: 2025-06-17
#4 · Quote Reply

[deleted]

Criminals and scammers are going to have a great day with the personal info of the 1 billion people now.

10
Ulu-Mulu-no-die lemmy.zip ulu_mulu@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-06-04
#5 · (edited) Quote Reply

In a catastrophic security failure, an AI-powered tool used by IDMerit, a global leader in digital identity verification, has exposed a staggering one billion personal records

Didn't it happened already that AI seriously compromised a production database? Will people ever learn?

6
sylver_dragon lemmy.world sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-07
#6 · Quote Reply

This one is a mixed bag. KYC regulations are very useful in detecting and prosecuting money laundering and crimes like human trafficking. But ya, if this data needs to be kept, the regulations around secure storage need to be just as tight. This sort of thing should be required to be kept to cybersecurity standards like CMMC Level 3, audited by outside auditors and violations treated as company and executive disqualifying events (you ran a company so poorly you failed to secure data, you're not allowed to run such a company for the next 10 years). The sort of negligence of leaving a database exposed to the web should already result in business crippling fines (think GDPR style fines listed in percentages of global annual revenue). A database which is exposed to the web and has default credentials or no access control at all should result in c-level exec seeing the inside of a jail cell. There is zero excuse for that happening in a company tasked with protecting data. And I refuse to believe it's the result of whatever scape-goat techs they try to pin this on. This sort of failure always comes from the top. It's caused by executives who want everything done fast and cheap and don't care about it being done right.

14
mina86 lemmy.wtf mina86@lemmy.wtf
Joined: 2025-03-13
#7 · (edited) Quote Reply

Criminals and scammers are going to have a great day with the personal info of the 1 billion people now.
[deleted]
-4
Vex_Detrause lemmy.ca Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-02-28
#8 · Quote Reply

[deleted]

If you gather all ropes, crowbars and knives then don't stop the criminal from getting access then it's the gov't fault. It's better if they just leave all those private knives alone and not gather it to one spot.

4
mina86 lemmy.wtf mina86@lemmy.wtf
Joined: 2025-03-13
#9 · Quote Reply

If you gather all ropes, crowbars and knives then don't stop the criminal from getting access then it's the gov't fault. It's better if they just leave all those private knives alone and not gather it to one spot.
[deleted]
-3
Bane_Killgrind lemmy.dbzer0.com Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2025-06-15
#10 · Quote Reply

[deleted]

So why don't KYC laws come with punishments for data breaches?

If it's only there to help law enforcement and not protect anybody else what do you call that?

1
herseycokguzelolacak lemmy.ml herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml
Joined: 2025-06-17
#11 · Quote Reply

[deleted]

KYC laws resulted in the personal data of a billion people leaking. Criminals and scammers will use this data to cause much harm.

Yes, I can condemn supporters of KYC laws for their incompetence and stupidity. This was obviously going to happen at some point. If you stockpile data, it eventually leaks.

1
fizzle quokk.au fizzle@quokk.au
Joined: 2025-11-21
#12 · Quote Reply

[deleted]

The Post Title Says "12M Aussies personal data leaked - and 1 Billion worldwide".

That's not really sensational, it's two facts included in the article. Sensational would be "12m Aussies hacked" or something, implying something entirely different.

There's no assertion from the article or the title that KYC shouldn't happen - you seem to be imagining that.

However, if a service uses a third party to collect and store KYC data then that third party needs to take reasonable steps to safe guard that data.

6
mina86 lemmy.wtf mina86@lemmy.wtf
Joined: 2025-03-13
#13 · (edited) Quote Reply

The Post Title Says "12M Aussies personal data leaked - and 1 Billion worldwide". That's not really sensational, it's two facts included in the article. Sensational would be "12m Aussies hacked" or something, implying something entirely different. There's no assertion from the article or the title that KYC shouldn't happen - you seem to be imagining that. However, if a service uses a third part...
[deleted]
4
fizzle quokk.au fizzle@quokk.au
Joined: 2025-11-21
#14 · Quote Reply

[deleted]

Yeah my bad, I agree the title you saw is bullshit.

2
Static_Rocket lemmy.world Static_Rocket@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-12
#15 · Quote Reply

This one is a mixed bag. KYC regulations are very useful in detecting and prosecuting money laundering and crimes like human trafficking. But ya, if this data needs to be kept, the regulations around secure storage need to be just as tight. This sort of thing should be required to be kept to cybersecurity standards like CMMC Level 3, audited by outside auditors and violations treated as company...

I'm uninformed about this, but do KYC laws come into effect at some profit point or are they globally enforced. I don't see how any small businesses could possibly afford a 3rd party audit, or how that would even scale. I agree it's necessary, but logistically it seems problematic.

2
dendrite_soup lemmy.ml dendrite_soup@lemmy.ml
Joined: 2026-02-21
#16 · Quote Reply

I'm uninformed about this, but do KYC laws come into effect at some profit point or are they globally enforced. I don't see how any small businesses could possibly afford a 3rd party audit, or how that would even scale. I agree it's necessary, but logistically it seems problematic.
[removed by moderator]
2
Static_Rocket lemmy.world Static_Rocket@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-12
#17 · Quote Reply

[removed by moderator]

Ah, makes sense it would be targeted twards banking and financial businesses specifically. Better pinch point than some random commerce. In that case audits would be less problematic, though I'm not sure why outsourcing this data is even an option with the current rules. It's not like a business can be completely hands off in the acquisition or processing of that info.

1
Post Reply
Back to top